Physician use of persuasion and colorectal cancer screening

Jennifer Elston Lafata, Tracy Wunderlich, Sue Flocke, Nancy Oja-Tebbe, Karen E. Dyer, Laura A. Siminoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The impact of patient–physician communication on subsequent patient behavior has rarely been evaluated in the context of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening discussions. We describe physicians’ use of persuasive techniques when recommending CRC screening and evaluate its association with patients’ subsequent adherence to screening. Audio recordings of N = 414 periodic health examinations were joined with screening use data from electronic medical records and pre-/post-visit patient surveys. The association between persuasion and screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations. According to observer ratings, primary care physicians frequently use persuasive techniques (63 %) when recommending CRC screening, most commonly argument or refutation. However, physician persuasion was not associated with subsequent screening adherence. Physician use of persuasion may be a common vehicle for information provision during CRC screening discussions; however, our results do not support the sole reliance on persuasive techniques if the goal is to improve adherence to recommended screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-93
Number of pages7
JournalTranslational Behavioral Medicine
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Persuasive Communication
Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Physicians
Electronic Health Records
Primary Care Physicians
Patient Compliance
Communication
Health

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • Patient–physician communication
  • Persuasion
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Lafata, J. E., Wunderlich, T., Flocke, S., Oja-Tebbe, N., Dyer, K. E., & Siminoff, L. A. (2015). Physician use of persuasion and colorectal cancer screening. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 5(1), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0284-x

Physician use of persuasion and colorectal cancer screening. / Lafata, Jennifer Elston; Wunderlich, Tracy; Flocke, Sue; Oja-Tebbe, Nancy; Dyer, Karen E.; Siminoff, Laura A.

In: Translational Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 87-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lafata, JE, Wunderlich, T, Flocke, S, Oja-Tebbe, N, Dyer, KE & Siminoff, LA 2015, 'Physician use of persuasion and colorectal cancer screening', Translational Behavioral Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-014-0284-x
Lafata, Jennifer Elston ; Wunderlich, Tracy ; Flocke, Sue ; Oja-Tebbe, Nancy ; Dyer, Karen E. ; Siminoff, Laura A. / Physician use of persuasion and colorectal cancer screening. In: Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 87-93.
@article{066c3cd72fd9422ba553d00d790a62ad,
title = "Physician use of persuasion and colorectal cancer screening",
abstract = "The impact of patient–physician communication on subsequent patient behavior has rarely been evaluated in the context of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening discussions. We describe physicians’ use of persuasive techniques when recommending CRC screening and evaluate its association with patients’ subsequent adherence to screening. Audio recordings of N = 414 periodic health examinations were joined with screening use data from electronic medical records and pre-/post-visit patient surveys. The association between persuasion and screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations. According to observer ratings, primary care physicians frequently use persuasive techniques (63 {\%}) when recommending CRC screening, most commonly argument or refutation. However, physician persuasion was not associated with subsequent screening adherence. Physician use of persuasion may be a common vehicle for information provision during CRC screening discussions; however, our results do not support the sole reliance on persuasive techniques if the goal is to improve adherence to recommended screening.",
keywords = "Colorectal cancer, Patient–physician communication, Persuasion, Screening",
author = "Lafata, {Jennifer Elston} and Tracy Wunderlich and Sue Flocke and Nancy Oja-Tebbe and Dyer, {Karen E.} and Siminoff, {Laura A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13142-014-0284-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "87--93",
journal = "Translational Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "1869-6716",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician use of persuasion and colorectal cancer screening

AU - Lafata, Jennifer Elston

AU - Wunderlich, Tracy

AU - Flocke, Sue

AU - Oja-Tebbe, Nancy

AU - Dyer, Karen E.

AU - Siminoff, Laura A.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The impact of patient–physician communication on subsequent patient behavior has rarely been evaluated in the context of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening discussions. We describe physicians’ use of persuasive techniques when recommending CRC screening and evaluate its association with patients’ subsequent adherence to screening. Audio recordings of N = 414 periodic health examinations were joined with screening use data from electronic medical records and pre-/post-visit patient surveys. The association between persuasion and screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations. According to observer ratings, primary care physicians frequently use persuasive techniques (63 %) when recommending CRC screening, most commonly argument or refutation. However, physician persuasion was not associated with subsequent screening adherence. Physician use of persuasion may be a common vehicle for information provision during CRC screening discussions; however, our results do not support the sole reliance on persuasive techniques if the goal is to improve adherence to recommended screening.

AB - The impact of patient–physician communication on subsequent patient behavior has rarely been evaluated in the context of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening discussions. We describe physicians’ use of persuasive techniques when recommending CRC screening and evaluate its association with patients’ subsequent adherence to screening. Audio recordings of N = 414 periodic health examinations were joined with screening use data from electronic medical records and pre-/post-visit patient surveys. The association between persuasion and screening was assessed using generalized estimating equations. According to observer ratings, primary care physicians frequently use persuasive techniques (63 %) when recommending CRC screening, most commonly argument or refutation. However, physician persuasion was not associated with subsequent screening adherence. Physician use of persuasion may be a common vehicle for information provision during CRC screening discussions; however, our results do not support the sole reliance on persuasive techniques if the goal is to improve adherence to recommended screening.

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Patient–physician communication

KW - Persuasion

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924022124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924022124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13142-014-0284-x

DO - 10.1007/s13142-014-0284-x

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 87

EP - 93

JO - Translational Behavioral Medicine

JF - Translational Behavioral Medicine

SN - 1869-6716

IS - 1

ER -