Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux: An international survey

David T. Book, John S. Rhee, Robert J. Toohill, Timothy Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Although data exists to support the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and laryngitis, there is variability among otolaryngologists regarding the methods and criteria used to make the diagnosis. This study was undertaken to discern the current attitudes and practices of a select cohort of otolaryngologists in regards to LPR. Methods: Four hundred fifteen surveys were mailed to members of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association. Survey recipients were asked to rate patient symptomatology and physical examination findings in terms of their relationship to LPR and their preferred laryngeal visualization procedure in terms of clinical use and diagnostic accuracy. The role and validity of adjunctive diagnostic tests were also surveyed. Results: Survey response rate was 38%. Symptoms felt to be most related to reflux were: throat clearing (98.3%), persistent cough (96.6%), heartburn/dyspepsia (95.7%), globus sensation (94.9%), and voice quality change (94.9%). The physical examination findings felt to be most related to reflux included: arytenoid erythema (97.5%), vocal cord erythema (95.7%) and edema (95.7%), posterior commissure hypertrophy (94.9%), and arytenoid edema (94.0%). Fiberoptic laryngoscopy was the most commonly performed diagnostic visualization procedure (75.7%) and was also considered to be most sensitive and specific (45.0%). The most commonly ordered adjunctive test was a double pH probe (37.2%), which was also felt to be the most sensitive and specific adjunctive test (75.9%). Conclusion: A polling of a select group of otolaryngologists demonstrated agreement in the criteria used to diagnose reflux laryngitis, although some variability exists. The development of objective guidelines for the diagnosis of LPR is a critical initial step toward evaluating the manifestations and therapeutic interventions for this disease process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1399-1406
Number of pages8
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume112
Issue number8 I
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Laryngitis
Erythema
Physical Examination
Edema
Voice Quality
Heartburn
Laryngoscopy
Vocal Cords
Dyspepsia
Pharynx
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Cough
Hypertrophy
Guidelines
Surveys and Questionnaires
Otolaryngologists

Keywords

  • Laryngopharyngeal reflux
  • Reflux laryngitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Book, D. T., Rhee, J. S., Toohill, R. J., & Smith, T. (2002). Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux: An international survey. Laryngoscope, 112(8 I), 1399-1406.

Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux : An international survey. / Book, David T.; Rhee, John S.; Toohill, Robert J.; Smith, Timothy.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 112, No. 8 I, 2002, p. 1399-1406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Book, DT, Rhee, JS, Toohill, RJ & Smith, T 2002, 'Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux: An international survey', Laryngoscope, vol. 112, no. 8 I, pp. 1399-1406.
Book DT, Rhee JS, Toohill RJ, Smith T. Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux: An international survey. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(8 I):1399-1406.
Book, David T. ; Rhee, John S. ; Toohill, Robert J. ; Smith, Timothy. / Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux : An international survey. In: Laryngoscope. 2002 ; Vol. 112, No. 8 I. pp. 1399-1406.
@article{5a7353283c4b47d29ffb7c894a3cabd8,
title = "Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux: An international survey",
abstract = "Objectives: Although data exists to support the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and laryngitis, there is variability among otolaryngologists regarding the methods and criteria used to make the diagnosis. This study was undertaken to discern the current attitudes and practices of a select cohort of otolaryngologists in regards to LPR. Methods: Four hundred fifteen surveys were mailed to members of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association. Survey recipients were asked to rate patient symptomatology and physical examination findings in terms of their relationship to LPR and their preferred laryngeal visualization procedure in terms of clinical use and diagnostic accuracy. The role and validity of adjunctive diagnostic tests were also surveyed. Results: Survey response rate was 38{\%}. Symptoms felt to be most related to reflux were: throat clearing (98.3{\%}), persistent cough (96.6{\%}), heartburn/dyspepsia (95.7{\%}), globus sensation (94.9{\%}), and voice quality change (94.9{\%}). The physical examination findings felt to be most related to reflux included: arytenoid erythema (97.5{\%}), vocal cord erythema (95.7{\%}) and edema (95.7{\%}), posterior commissure hypertrophy (94.9{\%}), and arytenoid edema (94.0{\%}). Fiberoptic laryngoscopy was the most commonly performed diagnostic visualization procedure (75.7{\%}) and was also considered to be most sensitive and specific (45.0{\%}). The most commonly ordered adjunctive test was a double pH probe (37.2{\%}), which was also felt to be the most sensitive and specific adjunctive test (75.9{\%}). Conclusion: A polling of a select group of otolaryngologists demonstrated agreement in the criteria used to diagnose reflux laryngitis, although some variability exists. The development of objective guidelines for the diagnosis of LPR is a critical initial step toward evaluating the manifestations and therapeutic interventions for this disease process.",
keywords = "Laryngopharyngeal reflux, Reflux laryngitis",
author = "Book, {David T.} and Rhee, {John S.} and Toohill, {Robert J.} and Timothy Smith",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "1399--1406",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "8 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux

T2 - An international survey

AU - Book, David T.

AU - Rhee, John S.

AU - Toohill, Robert J.

AU - Smith, Timothy

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Objectives: Although data exists to support the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and laryngitis, there is variability among otolaryngologists regarding the methods and criteria used to make the diagnosis. This study was undertaken to discern the current attitudes and practices of a select cohort of otolaryngologists in regards to LPR. Methods: Four hundred fifteen surveys were mailed to members of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association. Survey recipients were asked to rate patient symptomatology and physical examination findings in terms of their relationship to LPR and their preferred laryngeal visualization procedure in terms of clinical use and diagnostic accuracy. The role and validity of adjunctive diagnostic tests were also surveyed. Results: Survey response rate was 38%. Symptoms felt to be most related to reflux were: throat clearing (98.3%), persistent cough (96.6%), heartburn/dyspepsia (95.7%), globus sensation (94.9%), and voice quality change (94.9%). The physical examination findings felt to be most related to reflux included: arytenoid erythema (97.5%), vocal cord erythema (95.7%) and edema (95.7%), posterior commissure hypertrophy (94.9%), and arytenoid edema (94.0%). Fiberoptic laryngoscopy was the most commonly performed diagnostic visualization procedure (75.7%) and was also considered to be most sensitive and specific (45.0%). The most commonly ordered adjunctive test was a double pH probe (37.2%), which was also felt to be the most sensitive and specific adjunctive test (75.9%). Conclusion: A polling of a select group of otolaryngologists demonstrated agreement in the criteria used to diagnose reflux laryngitis, although some variability exists. The development of objective guidelines for the diagnosis of LPR is a critical initial step toward evaluating the manifestations and therapeutic interventions for this disease process.

AB - Objectives: Although data exists to support the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and laryngitis, there is variability among otolaryngologists regarding the methods and criteria used to make the diagnosis. This study was undertaken to discern the current attitudes and practices of a select cohort of otolaryngologists in regards to LPR. Methods: Four hundred fifteen surveys were mailed to members of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association. Survey recipients were asked to rate patient symptomatology and physical examination findings in terms of their relationship to LPR and their preferred laryngeal visualization procedure in terms of clinical use and diagnostic accuracy. The role and validity of adjunctive diagnostic tests were also surveyed. Results: Survey response rate was 38%. Symptoms felt to be most related to reflux were: throat clearing (98.3%), persistent cough (96.6%), heartburn/dyspepsia (95.7%), globus sensation (94.9%), and voice quality change (94.9%). The physical examination findings felt to be most related to reflux included: arytenoid erythema (97.5%), vocal cord erythema (95.7%) and edema (95.7%), posterior commissure hypertrophy (94.9%), and arytenoid edema (94.0%). Fiberoptic laryngoscopy was the most commonly performed diagnostic visualization procedure (75.7%) and was also considered to be most sensitive and specific (45.0%). The most commonly ordered adjunctive test was a double pH probe (37.2%), which was also felt to be the most sensitive and specific adjunctive test (75.9%). Conclusion: A polling of a select group of otolaryngologists demonstrated agreement in the criteria used to diagnose reflux laryngitis, although some variability exists. The development of objective guidelines for the diagnosis of LPR is a critical initial step toward evaluating the manifestations and therapeutic interventions for this disease process.

KW - Laryngopharyngeal reflux

KW - Reflux laryngitis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036342032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036342032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12172252

AN - SCOPUS:0036342032

VL - 112

SP - 1399

EP - 1406

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 8 I

ER -