Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography

Susan A. Mulligan, Tetsuya Matsuda, Peter Lanzer, Gary M. Gross, William D. Routh, Frederick Keller, D. Bradley Koslin, Lincoln L. Berland, Mitzi D. Fields, Mark Doyle, Gregory B. Cranney, Jeannette Y. Lee, Gerald M. Pohost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conventional angiography, two-dimensional inflow magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and color duplex ultrasound (US) were performed on 12 patients in a blinded, prospective study. The ability to grade arterial lesions and plan revascularization interventions were compared. Arterial lesions were categorized as nonsignificant (0%-49% diameter reduction) or significant (50%-100% diameter reduction). Determination of nonsignificant and significant lesions with MR angiography was in agreement with that at conventional angiography in 100 of 140 lesions (71%). Agreement between results of conventional angiography and color duplex US occurred with 114 of 123 infrainguinal lesions (93%). Twenty-one vascular interventions were planned by using conventional angiography; there was agreement with color duplex US in 11 cases and MR angiography in five. Color duplex US performed well in the assessment of infrainguinal disease but was limited in the evaluation of iliac segments because of nonvisualization. The iliac region was visualized in more patients with MR angiography than with color duplex US, but image quality with MR angiography was inconsistent. Strategies to improve MR angiography of the peripheral vasculature merit further study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)695-700
Number of pages6
JournalRadiology
Volume178
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Angiography
Color
Blood Vessels
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Angiography, comparative studies
  • Arteries, extremities, 92.721
  • Arteries, iliac, 98.721
  • Arteries, peripheral, 92.721
  • Arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 92.721
  • Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies
  • Ultrasound (US), comparative studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Mulligan, S. A., Matsuda, T., Lanzer, P., Gross, G. M., Routh, W. D., Keller, F., ... Pohost, G. M. (1991). Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography. Radiology, 178(3), 695-700.

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease : Prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography. / Mulligan, Susan A.; Matsuda, Tetsuya; Lanzer, Peter; Gross, Gary M.; Routh, William D.; Keller, Frederick; Koslin, D. Bradley; Berland, Lincoln L.; Fields, Mitzi D.; Doyle, Mark; Cranney, Gregory B.; Lee, Jeannette Y.; Pohost, Gerald M.

In: Radiology, Vol. 178, No. 3, 03.1991, p. 695-700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mulligan, SA, Matsuda, T, Lanzer, P, Gross, GM, Routh, WD, Keller, F, Koslin, DB, Berland, LL, Fields, MD, Doyle, M, Cranney, GB, Lee, JY & Pohost, GM 1991, 'Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography', Radiology, vol. 178, no. 3, pp. 695-700.
Mulligan, Susan A. ; Matsuda, Tetsuya ; Lanzer, Peter ; Gross, Gary M. ; Routh, William D. ; Keller, Frederick ; Koslin, D. Bradley ; Berland, Lincoln L. ; Fields, Mitzi D. ; Doyle, Mark ; Cranney, Gregory B. ; Lee, Jeannette Y. ; Pohost, Gerald M. / Peripheral arterial occlusive disease : Prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography. In: Radiology. 1991 ; Vol. 178, No. 3. pp. 695-700.
@article{f43381867b814452963e385f42b03e82,
title = "Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography",
abstract = "Conventional angiography, two-dimensional inflow magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and color duplex ultrasound (US) were performed on 12 patients in a blinded, prospective study. The ability to grade arterial lesions and plan revascularization interventions were compared. Arterial lesions were categorized as nonsignificant (0{\%}-49{\%} diameter reduction) or significant (50{\%}-100{\%} diameter reduction). Determination of nonsignificant and significant lesions with MR angiography was in agreement with that at conventional angiography in 100 of 140 lesions (71{\%}). Agreement between results of conventional angiography and color duplex US occurred with 114 of 123 infrainguinal lesions (93{\%}). Twenty-one vascular interventions were planned by using conventional angiography; there was agreement with color duplex US in 11 cases and MR angiography in five. Color duplex US performed well in the assessment of infrainguinal disease but was limited in the evaluation of iliac segments because of nonvisualization. The iliac region was visualized in more patients with MR angiography than with color duplex US, but image quality with MR angiography was inconsistent. Strategies to improve MR angiography of the peripheral vasculature merit further study.",
keywords = "Angiography, comparative studies, Arteries, extremities, 92.721, Arteries, iliac, 98.721, Arteries, peripheral, 92.721, Arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 92.721, Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies, Ultrasound (US), comparative studies",
author = "Mulligan, {Susan A.} and Tetsuya Matsuda and Peter Lanzer and Gross, {Gary M.} and Routh, {William D.} and Frederick Keller and Koslin, {D. Bradley} and Berland, {Lincoln L.} and Fields, {Mitzi D.} and Mark Doyle and Cranney, {Gregory B.} and Lee, {Jeannette Y.} and Pohost, {Gerald M.}",
year = "1991",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "178",
pages = "695--700",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peripheral arterial occlusive disease

T2 - Prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography

AU - Mulligan, Susan A.

AU - Matsuda, Tetsuya

AU - Lanzer, Peter

AU - Gross, Gary M.

AU - Routh, William D.

AU - Keller, Frederick

AU - Koslin, D. Bradley

AU - Berland, Lincoln L.

AU - Fields, Mitzi D.

AU - Doyle, Mark

AU - Cranney, Gregory B.

AU - Lee, Jeannette Y.

AU - Pohost, Gerald M.

PY - 1991/3

Y1 - 1991/3

N2 - Conventional angiography, two-dimensional inflow magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and color duplex ultrasound (US) were performed on 12 patients in a blinded, prospective study. The ability to grade arterial lesions and plan revascularization interventions were compared. Arterial lesions were categorized as nonsignificant (0%-49% diameter reduction) or significant (50%-100% diameter reduction). Determination of nonsignificant and significant lesions with MR angiography was in agreement with that at conventional angiography in 100 of 140 lesions (71%). Agreement between results of conventional angiography and color duplex US occurred with 114 of 123 infrainguinal lesions (93%). Twenty-one vascular interventions were planned by using conventional angiography; there was agreement with color duplex US in 11 cases and MR angiography in five. Color duplex US performed well in the assessment of infrainguinal disease but was limited in the evaluation of iliac segments because of nonvisualization. The iliac region was visualized in more patients with MR angiography than with color duplex US, but image quality with MR angiography was inconsistent. Strategies to improve MR angiography of the peripheral vasculature merit further study.

AB - Conventional angiography, two-dimensional inflow magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and color duplex ultrasound (US) were performed on 12 patients in a blinded, prospective study. The ability to grade arterial lesions and plan revascularization interventions were compared. Arterial lesions were categorized as nonsignificant (0%-49% diameter reduction) or significant (50%-100% diameter reduction). Determination of nonsignificant and significant lesions with MR angiography was in agreement with that at conventional angiography in 100 of 140 lesions (71%). Agreement between results of conventional angiography and color duplex US occurred with 114 of 123 infrainguinal lesions (93%). Twenty-one vascular interventions were planned by using conventional angiography; there was agreement with color duplex US in 11 cases and MR angiography in five. Color duplex US performed well in the assessment of infrainguinal disease but was limited in the evaluation of iliac segments because of nonvisualization. The iliac region was visualized in more patients with MR angiography than with color duplex US, but image quality with MR angiography was inconsistent. Strategies to improve MR angiography of the peripheral vasculature merit further study.

KW - Angiography, comparative studies

KW - Arteries, extremities, 92.721

KW - Arteries, iliac, 98.721

KW - Arteries, peripheral, 92.721

KW - Arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 92.721

KW - Magnetic resonance (MR), comparative studies

KW - Ultrasound (US), comparative studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026030732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026030732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1994405

AN - SCOPUS:0026030732

VL - 178

SP - 695

EP - 700

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -