Performance of the US Office of Management and Budget's revised race and ethnicity categories in Asian populations

Joan L. Holup, Nancy Press, William M. Vollmer, Emily L. Harris, Thomas M. Vogt, Chuhe Chen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The US Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidelines for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity information recently divided the "Asian or Pacific Islander" category into "Asian" and "Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander." The OMB's decision to disaggregate the "Asian or Pacific Islander" category was the first step toward providing these communities with information to better serve their needs. However, whether individuals who formerly made up the combined group categorize themselves as the new guidelines intend is a question analyzed in this report. A subset of adults participating in the Hemochromatosis and Iron Overload Screening Study completed both the OMB-minimum and the expanded race and ethnicity measure used in the National Health Interview Survey. We compared responses on the expanded measure contained within the OMB "Asian" definition (Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, Japanese, Asian Indian, Chinese, and/or Other Asian) to "Asian" responses on the OMB-minimum measure. Mixed heritage Asians less often marked "Asian." Among mixed heritage Japanese, Chinese, and Filipinos, 27%, 49%, and 52% did not mark "Asian" on the OMB measure, respectively. Eleven percent of single-heritage Filipinos did not mark "Asian." Many individuals formerly making up the combined "Asian or Pacific Islander" group do not categorize themselves as the revised OMB guidelines intend. This is particularly evident among Filipinos and among Asians of mixed heritage. This research illuminates the reliability and utility of the broad "Asian" category and points to possible consequences of collapsing groups into a single category, i.e., missed information and/or erroneous generalization.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)561-573
    Number of pages13
    JournalInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations
    Volume31
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2007

    Fingerprint

    Office Management
    Budgets
    budget
    ethnicity
    management
    Population
    performance
    Guidelines
    Oceanic Ancestry Group
    Iron Overload
    Hemochromatosis
    Group
    Health Surveys
    Ethnic groups
    Asia
    Interviews
    interview
    health
    Research

    Keywords

    • Asian
    • Ethnic identity
    • Ethnicity
    • Measurement
    • Race

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Business and International Management
    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Performance of the US Office of Management and Budget's revised race and ethnicity categories in Asian populations. / Holup, Joan L.; Press, Nancy; Vollmer, William M.; Harris, Emily L.; Vogt, Thomas M.; Chen, Chuhe.

    In: International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 31, No. 5, 09.2007, p. 561-573.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Holup, Joan L. ; Press, Nancy ; Vollmer, William M. ; Harris, Emily L. ; Vogt, Thomas M. ; Chen, Chuhe. / Performance of the US Office of Management and Budget's revised race and ethnicity categories in Asian populations. In: International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2007 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 561-573.
    @article{0730eebf99e3421bab4a7a7e36fcf3a7,
    title = "Performance of the US Office of Management and Budget's revised race and ethnicity categories in Asian populations",
    abstract = "The US Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidelines for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity information recently divided the {"}Asian or Pacific Islander{"} category into {"}Asian{"} and {"}Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.{"} The OMB's decision to disaggregate the {"}Asian or Pacific Islander{"} category was the first step toward providing these communities with information to better serve their needs. However, whether individuals who formerly made up the combined group categorize themselves as the new guidelines intend is a question analyzed in this report. A subset of adults participating in the Hemochromatosis and Iron Overload Screening Study completed both the OMB-minimum and the expanded race and ethnicity measure used in the National Health Interview Survey. We compared responses on the expanded measure contained within the OMB {"}Asian{"} definition (Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, Japanese, Asian Indian, Chinese, and/or Other Asian) to {"}Asian{"} responses on the OMB-minimum measure. Mixed heritage Asians less often marked {"}Asian.{"} Among mixed heritage Japanese, Chinese, and Filipinos, 27{\%}, 49{\%}, and 52{\%} did not mark {"}Asian{"} on the OMB measure, respectively. Eleven percent of single-heritage Filipinos did not mark {"}Asian.{"} Many individuals formerly making up the combined {"}Asian or Pacific Islander{"} group do not categorize themselves as the revised OMB guidelines intend. This is particularly evident among Filipinos and among Asians of mixed heritage. This research illuminates the reliability and utility of the broad {"}Asian{"} category and points to possible consequences of collapsing groups into a single category, i.e., missed information and/or erroneous generalization.",
    keywords = "Asian, Ethnic identity, Ethnicity, Measurement, Race",
    author = "Holup, {Joan L.} and Nancy Press and Vollmer, {William M.} and Harris, {Emily L.} and Vogt, {Thomas M.} and Chuhe Chen",
    year = "2007",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.02.001",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "31",
    pages = "561--573",
    journal = "International Journal of Intercultural Relations",
    issn = "0147-1767",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Performance of the US Office of Management and Budget's revised race and ethnicity categories in Asian populations

    AU - Holup, Joan L.

    AU - Press, Nancy

    AU - Vollmer, William M.

    AU - Harris, Emily L.

    AU - Vogt, Thomas M.

    AU - Chen, Chuhe

    PY - 2007/9

    Y1 - 2007/9

    N2 - The US Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidelines for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity information recently divided the "Asian or Pacific Islander" category into "Asian" and "Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander." The OMB's decision to disaggregate the "Asian or Pacific Islander" category was the first step toward providing these communities with information to better serve their needs. However, whether individuals who formerly made up the combined group categorize themselves as the new guidelines intend is a question analyzed in this report. A subset of adults participating in the Hemochromatosis and Iron Overload Screening Study completed both the OMB-minimum and the expanded race and ethnicity measure used in the National Health Interview Survey. We compared responses on the expanded measure contained within the OMB "Asian" definition (Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, Japanese, Asian Indian, Chinese, and/or Other Asian) to "Asian" responses on the OMB-minimum measure. Mixed heritage Asians less often marked "Asian." Among mixed heritage Japanese, Chinese, and Filipinos, 27%, 49%, and 52% did not mark "Asian" on the OMB measure, respectively. Eleven percent of single-heritage Filipinos did not mark "Asian." Many individuals formerly making up the combined "Asian or Pacific Islander" group do not categorize themselves as the revised OMB guidelines intend. This is particularly evident among Filipinos and among Asians of mixed heritage. This research illuminates the reliability and utility of the broad "Asian" category and points to possible consequences of collapsing groups into a single category, i.e., missed information and/or erroneous generalization.

    AB - The US Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidelines for collecting and reporting race and ethnicity information recently divided the "Asian or Pacific Islander" category into "Asian" and "Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander." The OMB's decision to disaggregate the "Asian or Pacific Islander" category was the first step toward providing these communities with information to better serve their needs. However, whether individuals who formerly made up the combined group categorize themselves as the new guidelines intend is a question analyzed in this report. A subset of adults participating in the Hemochromatosis and Iron Overload Screening Study completed both the OMB-minimum and the expanded race and ethnicity measure used in the National Health Interview Survey. We compared responses on the expanded measure contained within the OMB "Asian" definition (Filipino, Korean, Vietnamese, Japanese, Asian Indian, Chinese, and/or Other Asian) to "Asian" responses on the OMB-minimum measure. Mixed heritage Asians less often marked "Asian." Among mixed heritage Japanese, Chinese, and Filipinos, 27%, 49%, and 52% did not mark "Asian" on the OMB measure, respectively. Eleven percent of single-heritage Filipinos did not mark "Asian." Many individuals formerly making up the combined "Asian or Pacific Islander" group do not categorize themselves as the revised OMB guidelines intend. This is particularly evident among Filipinos and among Asians of mixed heritage. This research illuminates the reliability and utility of the broad "Asian" category and points to possible consequences of collapsing groups into a single category, i.e., missed information and/or erroneous generalization.

    KW - Asian

    KW - Ethnic identity

    KW - Ethnicity

    KW - Measurement

    KW - Race

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547842227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547842227&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.02.001

    DO - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.02.001

    M3 - Article

    VL - 31

    SP - 561

    EP - 573

    JO - International Journal of Intercultural Relations

    JF - International Journal of Intercultural Relations

    SN - 0147-1767

    IS - 5

    ER -