Patterns, relevance and predictors of heart failure dyadic symptom appraisal

Christopher Lee, James Mudd, Jonathan Auld, Jill Gelow, Shirin O. Hiatt, Christopher Chien, Julie T. Bidwell, Karen Lyons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Caregivers are thought to play a major role in helping patients first appraise and then respond to heart failure (HF) symptoms. Aims: The aims of this study were to: (a) characterise distinct patterns of HF patient-caregiver dyads with respect to symptom appraisal; and (b) link dyadic symptom appraisal to contributions to self-care and caregiver strain. Methods and results: A cross-sectional dyadic descriptive design was used to capture patient and caregiver appraisal of patient HF symptoms (i.e. dyspnoea, fatigue, pain and anxiety). Contributions to self-care were measured using patient and caregiver versions of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index and the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale. Caregiver strain was measured using the Multidimensional Caregiver Strain Index. Multilevel and latent class mixture modelling (LCMM) were used to examine distinct patterns of symptom appraisal. Two patterns of dyadic symptom appraisal were identified: one pattern (n = 24; 38.7%) wherein caregivers appraised patients' symptoms as being significantly worse than did the patient (labelled as 'Caregiver > Patient'); and a second pattern (n = 38; 61.3%) wherein patients appraised their symptoms similar to or worse than that as perceived by their caregiver (labelled as 'Patient 3/4 Caregiver'). Dyads in the Caregiver > Patient pattern of symptom appraisal reported much better contributions to self-care (symptom response behaviours only), but also greater caregiver strain, compared with dyads in the Patient 3/4 Caregiver pattern. Greater patient depression and older caregiver age were significant determinants of fitting the Patient 3/4 Caregiver pattern. Conclusion: Differences in how HF patients and caregivers appraise symptoms together must be taken into consideration when examining contributions to HF care and caregiver outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-604
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Heart Failure
Self Care
Dyspnea
Fatigue

Keywords

  • Caregiving
  • heart failure
  • self-care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Medical–Surgical
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Patterns, relevance and predictors of heart failure dyadic symptom appraisal. / Lee, Christopher; Mudd, James; Auld, Jonathan; Gelow, Jill; Hiatt, Shirin O.; Chien, Christopher; Bidwell, Julie T.; Lyons, Karen.

In: European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Vol. 16, No. 7, 01.10.2017, p. 595-604.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Christopher ; Mudd, James ; Auld, Jonathan ; Gelow, Jill ; Hiatt, Shirin O. ; Chien, Christopher ; Bidwell, Julie T. ; Lyons, Karen. / Patterns, relevance and predictors of heart failure dyadic symptom appraisal. In: European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2017 ; Vol. 16, No. 7. pp. 595-604.
@article{7042875464144221802451730cd1629d,
title = "Patterns, relevance and predictors of heart failure dyadic symptom appraisal",
abstract = "Background: Caregivers are thought to play a major role in helping patients first appraise and then respond to heart failure (HF) symptoms. Aims: The aims of this study were to: (a) characterise distinct patterns of HF patient-caregiver dyads with respect to symptom appraisal; and (b) link dyadic symptom appraisal to contributions to self-care and caregiver strain. Methods and results: A cross-sectional dyadic descriptive design was used to capture patient and caregiver appraisal of patient HF symptoms (i.e. dyspnoea, fatigue, pain and anxiety). Contributions to self-care were measured using patient and caregiver versions of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index and the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale. Caregiver strain was measured using the Multidimensional Caregiver Strain Index. Multilevel and latent class mixture modelling (LCMM) were used to examine distinct patterns of symptom appraisal. Two patterns of dyadic symptom appraisal were identified: one pattern (n = 24; 38.7{\%}) wherein caregivers appraised patients' symptoms as being significantly worse than did the patient (labelled as 'Caregiver > Patient'); and a second pattern (n = 38; 61.3{\%}) wherein patients appraised their symptoms similar to or worse than that as perceived by their caregiver (labelled as 'Patient 3/4 Caregiver'). Dyads in the Caregiver > Patient pattern of symptom appraisal reported much better contributions to self-care (symptom response behaviours only), but also greater caregiver strain, compared with dyads in the Patient 3/4 Caregiver pattern. Greater patient depression and older caregiver age were significant determinants of fitting the Patient 3/4 Caregiver pattern. Conclusion: Differences in how HF patients and caregivers appraise symptoms together must be taken into consideration when examining contributions to HF care and caregiver outcomes.",
keywords = "Caregiving, heart failure, self-care",
author = "Christopher Lee and James Mudd and Jonathan Auld and Jill Gelow and Hiatt, {Shirin O.} and Christopher Chien and Bidwell, {Julie T.} and Karen Lyons",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1474515117700760",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "595--604",
journal = "European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing",
issn = "1474-5151",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns, relevance and predictors of heart failure dyadic symptom appraisal

AU - Lee, Christopher

AU - Mudd, James

AU - Auld, Jonathan

AU - Gelow, Jill

AU - Hiatt, Shirin O.

AU - Chien, Christopher

AU - Bidwell, Julie T.

AU - Lyons, Karen

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Background: Caregivers are thought to play a major role in helping patients first appraise and then respond to heart failure (HF) symptoms. Aims: The aims of this study were to: (a) characterise distinct patterns of HF patient-caregiver dyads with respect to symptom appraisal; and (b) link dyadic symptom appraisal to contributions to self-care and caregiver strain. Methods and results: A cross-sectional dyadic descriptive design was used to capture patient and caregiver appraisal of patient HF symptoms (i.e. dyspnoea, fatigue, pain and anxiety). Contributions to self-care were measured using patient and caregiver versions of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index and the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale. Caregiver strain was measured using the Multidimensional Caregiver Strain Index. Multilevel and latent class mixture modelling (LCMM) were used to examine distinct patterns of symptom appraisal. Two patterns of dyadic symptom appraisal were identified: one pattern (n = 24; 38.7%) wherein caregivers appraised patients' symptoms as being significantly worse than did the patient (labelled as 'Caregiver > Patient'); and a second pattern (n = 38; 61.3%) wherein patients appraised their symptoms similar to or worse than that as perceived by their caregiver (labelled as 'Patient 3/4 Caregiver'). Dyads in the Caregiver > Patient pattern of symptom appraisal reported much better contributions to self-care (symptom response behaviours only), but also greater caregiver strain, compared with dyads in the Patient 3/4 Caregiver pattern. Greater patient depression and older caregiver age were significant determinants of fitting the Patient 3/4 Caregiver pattern. Conclusion: Differences in how HF patients and caregivers appraise symptoms together must be taken into consideration when examining contributions to HF care and caregiver outcomes.

AB - Background: Caregivers are thought to play a major role in helping patients first appraise and then respond to heart failure (HF) symptoms. Aims: The aims of this study were to: (a) characterise distinct patterns of HF patient-caregiver dyads with respect to symptom appraisal; and (b) link dyadic symptom appraisal to contributions to self-care and caregiver strain. Methods and results: A cross-sectional dyadic descriptive design was used to capture patient and caregiver appraisal of patient HF symptoms (i.e. dyspnoea, fatigue, pain and anxiety). Contributions to self-care were measured using patient and caregiver versions of the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index and the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale. Caregiver strain was measured using the Multidimensional Caregiver Strain Index. Multilevel and latent class mixture modelling (LCMM) were used to examine distinct patterns of symptom appraisal. Two patterns of dyadic symptom appraisal were identified: one pattern (n = 24; 38.7%) wherein caregivers appraised patients' symptoms as being significantly worse than did the patient (labelled as 'Caregiver > Patient'); and a second pattern (n = 38; 61.3%) wherein patients appraised their symptoms similar to or worse than that as perceived by their caregiver (labelled as 'Patient 3/4 Caregiver'). Dyads in the Caregiver > Patient pattern of symptom appraisal reported much better contributions to self-care (symptom response behaviours only), but also greater caregiver strain, compared with dyads in the Patient 3/4 Caregiver pattern. Greater patient depression and older caregiver age were significant determinants of fitting the Patient 3/4 Caregiver pattern. Conclusion: Differences in how HF patients and caregivers appraise symptoms together must be taken into consideration when examining contributions to HF care and caregiver outcomes.

KW - Caregiving

KW - heart failure

KW - self-care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030234001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030234001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1474515117700760

DO - 10.1177/1474515117700760

M3 - Article

C2 - 28895484

AN - SCOPUS:85030234001

VL - 16

SP - 595

EP - 604

JO - European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

JF - European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

SN - 1474-5151

IS - 7

ER -