Patterns of Incident Reporting Across Clinical Sites in a Regionally Expanding Academic Radiation Oncology Department

Byung Han Rhieu, Stephanie A. Terezakis, Stephen Greco, Curtiland Deville, Annette N. Souranis, Amanda Choflet, Theodore L. DeWeese, Akila N. Viswanathan, Wolfram Laub, Todd R. McNutt, Jean L. Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated patterns of event reporting across five clinical locations within an academic radiation oncology department, with the goal of better understanding variability across sites. Methods and Materials: We analyzed 1,351 events reported to a departmental incident learning system over 1 calendar year across the five locations with respect to volume of events, event type, process map location of origin and detection, and event reporter. Results: We found marked variability in reporting patterns, including reporting rate, event type, event severity, event location of origin and detection within the departmental process map, and discipline of event reporters. These differences relate both to variability in process and workflow (reflected by frequency of specific workflow events at each site) and in reporting culture (reflected by volume or rate of event reporting, and discipline of event reporter). Conclusions: These data highlight the variability in reporting culture even within a single department, and therefore the need to tailor and individualize safety and quality programs to the unique clinical site, with the long-term goal of achieving a common culture of safety while supporting unique processes at individual locations. This work also raises concern about extrapolating single-institution incident learning system results without understanding the unique workflow and culture of clinical sites.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiation Oncology
Workflow
Risk Management
Learning
Safety Management
Safety

Keywords

  • Radiation oncology incident learning system
  • RO-ILS
  • safety research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Patterns of Incident Reporting Across Clinical Sites in a Regionally Expanding Academic Radiation Oncology Department. / Rhieu, Byung Han; Terezakis, Stephanie A.; Greco, Stephen; Deville, Curtiland; Souranis, Annette N.; Choflet, Amanda; DeWeese, Theodore L.; Viswanathan, Akila N.; Laub, Wolfram; McNutt, Todd R.; Wright, Jean L.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rhieu, BH, Terezakis, SA, Greco, S, Deville, C, Souranis, AN, Choflet, A, DeWeese, TL, Viswanathan, AN, Laub, W, McNutt, TR & Wright, JL 2019, 'Patterns of Incident Reporting Across Clinical Sites in a Regionally Expanding Academic Radiation Oncology Department', Journal of the American College of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.010
Rhieu, Byung Han ; Terezakis, Stephanie A. ; Greco, Stephen ; Deville, Curtiland ; Souranis, Annette N. ; Choflet, Amanda ; DeWeese, Theodore L. ; Viswanathan, Akila N. ; Laub, Wolfram ; McNutt, Todd R. ; Wright, Jean L. / Patterns of Incident Reporting Across Clinical Sites in a Regionally Expanding Academic Radiation Oncology Department. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019.
@article{d61025631f8f47c0b8f92bc696875572,
title = "Patterns of Incident Reporting Across Clinical Sites in a Regionally Expanding Academic Radiation Oncology Department",
abstract = "Purpose: We evaluated patterns of event reporting across five clinical locations within an academic radiation oncology department, with the goal of better understanding variability across sites. Methods and Materials: We analyzed 1,351 events reported to a departmental incident learning system over 1 calendar year across the five locations with respect to volume of events, event type, process map location of origin and detection, and event reporter. Results: We found marked variability in reporting patterns, including reporting rate, event type, event severity, event location of origin and detection within the departmental process map, and discipline of event reporters. These differences relate both to variability in process and workflow (reflected by frequency of specific workflow events at each site) and in reporting culture (reflected by volume or rate of event reporting, and discipline of event reporter). Conclusions: These data highlight the variability in reporting culture even within a single department, and therefore the need to tailor and individualize safety and quality programs to the unique clinical site, with the long-term goal of achieving a common culture of safety while supporting unique processes at individual locations. This work also raises concern about extrapolating single-institution incident learning system results without understanding the unique workflow and culture of clinical sites.",
keywords = "Radiation oncology incident learning system, RO-ILS, safety research",
author = "Rhieu, {Byung Han} and Terezakis, {Stephanie A.} and Stephen Greco and Curtiland Deville and Souranis, {Annette N.} and Amanda Choflet and DeWeese, {Theodore L.} and Viswanathan, {Akila N.} and Wolfram Laub and McNutt, {Todd R.} and Wright, {Jean L.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.010",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of Incident Reporting Across Clinical Sites in a Regionally Expanding Academic Radiation Oncology Department

AU - Rhieu, Byung Han

AU - Terezakis, Stephanie A.

AU - Greco, Stephen

AU - Deville, Curtiland

AU - Souranis, Annette N.

AU - Choflet, Amanda

AU - DeWeese, Theodore L.

AU - Viswanathan, Akila N.

AU - Laub, Wolfram

AU - McNutt, Todd R.

AU - Wright, Jean L.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: We evaluated patterns of event reporting across five clinical locations within an academic radiation oncology department, with the goal of better understanding variability across sites. Methods and Materials: We analyzed 1,351 events reported to a departmental incident learning system over 1 calendar year across the five locations with respect to volume of events, event type, process map location of origin and detection, and event reporter. Results: We found marked variability in reporting patterns, including reporting rate, event type, event severity, event location of origin and detection within the departmental process map, and discipline of event reporters. These differences relate both to variability in process and workflow (reflected by frequency of specific workflow events at each site) and in reporting culture (reflected by volume or rate of event reporting, and discipline of event reporter). Conclusions: These data highlight the variability in reporting culture even within a single department, and therefore the need to tailor and individualize safety and quality programs to the unique clinical site, with the long-term goal of achieving a common culture of safety while supporting unique processes at individual locations. This work also raises concern about extrapolating single-institution incident learning system results without understanding the unique workflow and culture of clinical sites.

AB - Purpose: We evaluated patterns of event reporting across five clinical locations within an academic radiation oncology department, with the goal of better understanding variability across sites. Methods and Materials: We analyzed 1,351 events reported to a departmental incident learning system over 1 calendar year across the five locations with respect to volume of events, event type, process map location of origin and detection, and event reporter. Results: We found marked variability in reporting patterns, including reporting rate, event type, event severity, event location of origin and detection within the departmental process map, and discipline of event reporters. These differences relate both to variability in process and workflow (reflected by frequency of specific workflow events at each site) and in reporting culture (reflected by volume or rate of event reporting, and discipline of event reporter). Conclusions: These data highlight the variability in reporting culture even within a single department, and therefore the need to tailor and individualize safety and quality programs to the unique clinical site, with the long-term goal of achieving a common culture of safety while supporting unique processes at individual locations. This work also raises concern about extrapolating single-institution incident learning system results without understanding the unique workflow and culture of clinical sites.

KW - Radiation oncology incident learning system

KW - RO-ILS

KW - safety research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061063691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061063691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.010

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

ER -