Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening

Sue Flocke, Kurt C. Stange, Gregory S. Cooper, Tracy L. Wunderlich, Nancy Oja-Tebbe, George Divine, Jennifer Elston Lafata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Physician recommendation is one of the most important determinants of obtaining colorectal cancer (CRC) screening; however, little is known about the degree to which CRC screening discussions include information that patients report as important to guide screening decisions. This study examines and compares both patient rated importance and physician communication of key information elements about CRC screening during annual physical examinations. Methods: Design: Cross-sectional cohort. Setting: 26 ambulatory clinics of an integrated delivery system in the Midwest. Participants: 64 primary care physicians and 415 patients aged 50 to 80 due for CRC screening. Patients completed a previsit survey to assess importance of specific information when making a preventive screening decision. Visits were audio recorded to assess the content of screening discussions. Results: Most patients rated test accuracy (85%), testing alternatives (83%), the pros and cons of testing (86%), and the testing process (78%) very important when making preventive screening decisions. Ninety-one percent of visits included a CRC screening discussion; however, CRC screening talk rarely included information that patients rated as important. Physicians infrequently asked whether patients had questions pertaining to CRC screening (5%); however, 49% of patients asked a CRC screening question, with the vast majority pertaining to screening logistics. Conclusions: Audio recordings confirm that discussions of CRC screening are often lacking information that patients indicate is very important when making preventive health decisions and patient questions during the visit are not eliciting information to fill the gap. Impact: These findings provide actionable information to improve CRC screening discussions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2168-2173
Number of pages6
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume20
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Physicians
Integrated Delivery of Health Care
Primary Care Physicians
Physical Examination
Communication
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Flocke, S., Stange, K. C., Cooper, G. S., Wunderlich, T. L., Oja-Tebbe, N., Divine, G., & Lafata, J. E. (2011). Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 20(10), 2168-2173. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0281

Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening. / Flocke, Sue; Stange, Kurt C.; Cooper, Gregory S.; Wunderlich, Tracy L.; Oja-Tebbe, Nancy; Divine, George; Lafata, Jennifer Elston.

In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, Vol. 20, No. 10, 01.10.2011, p. 2168-2173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flocke, S, Stange, KC, Cooper, GS, Wunderlich, TL, Oja-Tebbe, N, Divine, G & Lafata, JE 2011, 'Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening', Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2168-2173. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0281
Flocke, Sue ; Stange, Kurt C. ; Cooper, Gregory S. ; Wunderlich, Tracy L. ; Oja-Tebbe, Nancy ; Divine, George ; Lafata, Jennifer Elston. / Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening. In: Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 10. pp. 2168-2173.
@article{8d4c855ee4ba429eacf2b41942cac10c,
title = "Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening",
abstract = "Background: Physician recommendation is one of the most important determinants of obtaining colorectal cancer (CRC) screening; however, little is known about the degree to which CRC screening discussions include information that patients report as important to guide screening decisions. This study examines and compares both patient rated importance and physician communication of key information elements about CRC screening during annual physical examinations. Methods: Design: Cross-sectional cohort. Setting: 26 ambulatory clinics of an integrated delivery system in the Midwest. Participants: 64 primary care physicians and 415 patients aged 50 to 80 due for CRC screening. Patients completed a previsit survey to assess importance of specific information when making a preventive screening decision. Visits were audio recorded to assess the content of screening discussions. Results: Most patients rated test accuracy (85{\%}), testing alternatives (83{\%}), the pros and cons of testing (86{\%}), and the testing process (78{\%}) very important when making preventive screening decisions. Ninety-one percent of visits included a CRC screening discussion; however, CRC screening talk rarely included information that patients rated as important. Physicians infrequently asked whether patients had questions pertaining to CRC screening (5{\%}); however, 49{\%} of patients asked a CRC screening question, with the vast majority pertaining to screening logistics. Conclusions: Audio recordings confirm that discussions of CRC screening are often lacking information that patients indicate is very important when making preventive health decisions and patient questions during the visit are not eliciting information to fill the gap. Impact: These findings provide actionable information to improve CRC screening discussions.",
author = "Sue Flocke and Stange, {Kurt C.} and Cooper, {Gregory S.} and Wunderlich, {Tracy L.} and Nancy Oja-Tebbe and George Divine and Lafata, {Jennifer Elston}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0281",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "2168--2173",
journal = "Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention",
issn = "1055-9965",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening

AU - Flocke, Sue

AU - Stange, Kurt C.

AU - Cooper, Gregory S.

AU - Wunderlich, Tracy L.

AU - Oja-Tebbe, Nancy

AU - Divine, George

AU - Lafata, Jennifer Elston

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Background: Physician recommendation is one of the most important determinants of obtaining colorectal cancer (CRC) screening; however, little is known about the degree to which CRC screening discussions include information that patients report as important to guide screening decisions. This study examines and compares both patient rated importance and physician communication of key information elements about CRC screening during annual physical examinations. Methods: Design: Cross-sectional cohort. Setting: 26 ambulatory clinics of an integrated delivery system in the Midwest. Participants: 64 primary care physicians and 415 patients aged 50 to 80 due for CRC screening. Patients completed a previsit survey to assess importance of specific information when making a preventive screening decision. Visits were audio recorded to assess the content of screening discussions. Results: Most patients rated test accuracy (85%), testing alternatives (83%), the pros and cons of testing (86%), and the testing process (78%) very important when making preventive screening decisions. Ninety-one percent of visits included a CRC screening discussion; however, CRC screening talk rarely included information that patients rated as important. Physicians infrequently asked whether patients had questions pertaining to CRC screening (5%); however, 49% of patients asked a CRC screening question, with the vast majority pertaining to screening logistics. Conclusions: Audio recordings confirm that discussions of CRC screening are often lacking information that patients indicate is very important when making preventive health decisions and patient questions during the visit are not eliciting information to fill the gap. Impact: These findings provide actionable information to improve CRC screening discussions.

AB - Background: Physician recommendation is one of the most important determinants of obtaining colorectal cancer (CRC) screening; however, little is known about the degree to which CRC screening discussions include information that patients report as important to guide screening decisions. This study examines and compares both patient rated importance and physician communication of key information elements about CRC screening during annual physical examinations. Methods: Design: Cross-sectional cohort. Setting: 26 ambulatory clinics of an integrated delivery system in the Midwest. Participants: 64 primary care physicians and 415 patients aged 50 to 80 due for CRC screening. Patients completed a previsit survey to assess importance of specific information when making a preventive screening decision. Visits were audio recorded to assess the content of screening discussions. Results: Most patients rated test accuracy (85%), testing alternatives (83%), the pros and cons of testing (86%), and the testing process (78%) very important when making preventive screening decisions. Ninety-one percent of visits included a CRC screening discussion; however, CRC screening talk rarely included information that patients rated as important. Physicians infrequently asked whether patients had questions pertaining to CRC screening (5%); however, 49% of patients asked a CRC screening question, with the vast majority pertaining to screening logistics. Conclusions: Audio recordings confirm that discussions of CRC screening are often lacking information that patients indicate is very important when making preventive health decisions and patient questions during the visit are not eliciting information to fill the gap. Impact: These findings provide actionable information to improve CRC screening discussions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053541555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053541555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0281

DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0281

M3 - Article

C2 - 21813727

AN - SCOPUS:80053541555

VL - 20

SP - 2168

EP - 2173

JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

SN - 1055-9965

IS - 10

ER -