“Not such a kid thing anymore”: Young adults' perspectives on transfer from paediatric to adult cardiology care

G. Catena, G. R. Rempel, Adrienne Kovacs, K. N. Rankin, I. V. Muhll, A. S. Mackie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Transfer of adolescents with congenital heart disease from paediatric cardiology providers to specialized adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) care providers is becoming a standard practice. However, some paediatric cardiologists continue to provide care for their patients into adult life. Little is known about the perspectives of young adult patients who have been transferred to ACHD clinics versus those who continue to receive their cardiology care in paediatric settings. Methods: Content and thematic analysis of structured telephone interviews with 21 young adults age 18–25 (13 transferred to ACHD clinic and 8 who had not transferred) was conducted to identify similarities and differences in patient characteristics of those in ACHD versus paediatric settings. Results: There were no appreciable differences in gender, age, heart disease type, and independence between those transferred to ACHD care versus those not transferred. Participants in both groups were aware of differences between the paediatric and ACHD care settings and providers, with some favouring the familiarity offered by the paediatric setting and providers. Participants had varying views on parental involvement in their care; most of them had attended clinic appointments on their own. Those who had transferred to ACHD care acknowledged that it would take time to adjust to new relationships. Positive perspectives on actual or anticipated transfer to ACHD care included a growing sense of autonomy and responsibility, as well as access to reproductive information relevant to ACHD patients. Conclusions: The absence of patient characteristics distinguishing those in ACHD care versus those still followed in paediatric care suggests that system, provider, and parent factors, rather than patient factors, may account for patients' perspectives on transfer to ACHD care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)592-598
Number of pages7
JournalChild: Care, Health and Development
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • ACHD
  • congenital heart disease
  • parent involvement
  • qualitative research methods
  • transfer
  • transition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this