Nonhuman primate quarantine: Its evolution and practice

Jeffrey A. Roberts, Kirk Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are imported to the United States for use in research, domestic breeding, and propagation of endangered populations in zoological gardens. During the past 60 years, individuals responsible for NHP importation programs have observed morbidity and mortality typically associated with infectious disease outbreaks. These outbreaks have included infectious agents such as tuberculosis, Herpesvirus sp., simian hemorrhagic fever, and filovirus infections such as the Ebola and Marburg viruses. Some outbreaks have affected both animal and human populations. These epizootics are attributable to a variety of factors, including increased population density, exposure of naïve populations to new infectious agents, and stress. The practice of quarantining animals arriving in the United States was first applied by individual research programs to improve animal health and ensure the quality of animals entering research programs. The development of government regulations for nonhuman primate quarantine accompanied the recognition that imported NHPs could pose a risk to public health. This article briefly reviews the history of US NHP importation and the factors behind the development of NHP quarantine regulations. The focus is on regulations concerned with infectious disease, public health, and the health of domestic primate colonies. These regulations have had the dual benefit of protecting public health as well as reducing animal morbidity and mortality during importation and quarantine. We review current practices and facilities for nonhuman primate quarantine and identify challenges for the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-156
Number of pages12
JournalILAR Journal
Volume49
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quarantine
quarantine
Primates
Animals
Public health
Disease Outbreaks
public health
Public Health
research programs
infectious diseases
morbidity
Marburg virus
Filoviridae
Marburgvirus
Ebolavirus
Government Regulation
Health
Population
Morbidity
Cercopithecine Herpesvirus 1

Keywords

  • Biohazards
  • CDC
  • Filovirus
  • Importation
  • Nonhuman primates
  • Quarantine
  • Tuberculosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Roberts, J. A., & Andrews, K. (2008). Nonhuman primate quarantine: Its evolution and practice. ILAR Journal, 49(2), 145-156.

Nonhuman primate quarantine : Its evolution and practice. / Roberts, Jeffrey A.; Andrews, Kirk.

In: ILAR Journal, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2008, p. 145-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roberts, JA & Andrews, K 2008, 'Nonhuman primate quarantine: Its evolution and practice', ILAR Journal, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 145-156.
Roberts JA, Andrews K. Nonhuman primate quarantine: Its evolution and practice. ILAR Journal. 2008;49(2):145-156.
Roberts, Jeffrey A. ; Andrews, Kirk. / Nonhuman primate quarantine : Its evolution and practice. In: ILAR Journal. 2008 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 145-156.
@article{7d864159f7d14ee4b3161dc46691b09f,
title = "Nonhuman primate quarantine: Its evolution and practice",
abstract = "Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are imported to the United States for use in research, domestic breeding, and propagation of endangered populations in zoological gardens. During the past 60 years, individuals responsible for NHP importation programs have observed morbidity and mortality typically associated with infectious disease outbreaks. These outbreaks have included infectious agents such as tuberculosis, Herpesvirus sp., simian hemorrhagic fever, and filovirus infections such as the Ebola and Marburg viruses. Some outbreaks have affected both animal and human populations. These epizootics are attributable to a variety of factors, including increased population density, exposure of na{\"i}ve populations to new infectious agents, and stress. The practice of quarantining animals arriving in the United States was first applied by individual research programs to improve animal health and ensure the quality of animals entering research programs. The development of government regulations for nonhuman primate quarantine accompanied the recognition that imported NHPs could pose a risk to public health. This article briefly reviews the history of US NHP importation and the factors behind the development of NHP quarantine regulations. The focus is on regulations concerned with infectious disease, public health, and the health of domestic primate colonies. These regulations have had the dual benefit of protecting public health as well as reducing animal morbidity and mortality during importation and quarantine. We review current practices and facilities for nonhuman primate quarantine and identify challenges for the future.",
keywords = "Biohazards, CDC, Filovirus, Importation, Nonhuman primates, Quarantine, Tuberculosis",
author = "Roberts, {Jeffrey A.} and Kirk Andrews",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "145--156",
journal = "ILAR Journal",
issn = "1084-2020",
publisher = "Institute for Laboratory Animal Research",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonhuman primate quarantine

T2 - Its evolution and practice

AU - Roberts, Jeffrey A.

AU - Andrews, Kirk

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are imported to the United States for use in research, domestic breeding, and propagation of endangered populations in zoological gardens. During the past 60 years, individuals responsible for NHP importation programs have observed morbidity and mortality typically associated with infectious disease outbreaks. These outbreaks have included infectious agents such as tuberculosis, Herpesvirus sp., simian hemorrhagic fever, and filovirus infections such as the Ebola and Marburg viruses. Some outbreaks have affected both animal and human populations. These epizootics are attributable to a variety of factors, including increased population density, exposure of naïve populations to new infectious agents, and stress. The practice of quarantining animals arriving in the United States was first applied by individual research programs to improve animal health and ensure the quality of animals entering research programs. The development of government regulations for nonhuman primate quarantine accompanied the recognition that imported NHPs could pose a risk to public health. This article briefly reviews the history of US NHP importation and the factors behind the development of NHP quarantine regulations. The focus is on regulations concerned with infectious disease, public health, and the health of domestic primate colonies. These regulations have had the dual benefit of protecting public health as well as reducing animal morbidity and mortality during importation and quarantine. We review current practices and facilities for nonhuman primate quarantine and identify challenges for the future.

AB - Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are imported to the United States for use in research, domestic breeding, and propagation of endangered populations in zoological gardens. During the past 60 years, individuals responsible for NHP importation programs have observed morbidity and mortality typically associated with infectious disease outbreaks. These outbreaks have included infectious agents such as tuberculosis, Herpesvirus sp., simian hemorrhagic fever, and filovirus infections such as the Ebola and Marburg viruses. Some outbreaks have affected both animal and human populations. These epizootics are attributable to a variety of factors, including increased population density, exposure of naïve populations to new infectious agents, and stress. The practice of quarantining animals arriving in the United States was first applied by individual research programs to improve animal health and ensure the quality of animals entering research programs. The development of government regulations for nonhuman primate quarantine accompanied the recognition that imported NHPs could pose a risk to public health. This article briefly reviews the history of US NHP importation and the factors behind the development of NHP quarantine regulations. The focus is on regulations concerned with infectious disease, public health, and the health of domestic primate colonies. These regulations have had the dual benefit of protecting public health as well as reducing animal morbidity and mortality during importation and quarantine. We review current practices and facilities for nonhuman primate quarantine and identify challenges for the future.

KW - Biohazards

KW - CDC

KW - Filovirus

KW - Importation

KW - Nonhuman primates

KW - Quarantine

KW - Tuberculosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48949120115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48949120115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18323577

AN - SCOPUS:48949120115

VL - 49

SP - 145

EP - 156

JO - ILAR Journal

JF - ILAR Journal

SN - 1084-2020

IS - 2

ER -