TY - JOUR
T1 - Natural history of neuromodulation devices and therapies
T2 - A patient-centered survival analysis
AU - Teton, Zoe E.
AU - Blatt, Daniel
AU - AlBakry, Amr
AU - Obayashi, James
AU - Ozturk, Gulsah
AU - Hamzaoglu, Vural
AU - Magown, Philippe
AU - Selden, Nathan R.
AU - Burchiel, Kim J.
AU - Raslan, Ahmed M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© AANS 2020, except where prohibited by US copyright law.
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - OBJECTIVE Despite rapid development and expansion of neuromodulation technologies, knowledge about device and/ or therapy durability remains limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term rate of hardware and therapeutic failure of implanted devices for several neuromodulation therapies. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients’ device and therapy survival data (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) for deep brain stimulation (DBS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at a single institution (years 1994–2015). RESULTS During the study period, 450 patients underwent DBS, 383 VNS, and 128 SCS. For DBS, the 5- and 10-year initial device survival was 87% and 73%, respectively, and therapy survival was 96% and 91%, respectively. For VNS, the 5- and 10-year initial device survival was 90% and 70%, respectively, and therapy survival was 99% and 97%, respectively. For SCS, the 5- and 10-year initial device survival was 50% and 34%, respectively, and therapy survival was 74% and 56%, respectively. The average initial device survival for DBS, VNS, and SCS was 14 years, 14 years, and 8 years while mean therapy survival was 18 years, 18 years, and 12.5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The authors report, for the first time, comparative device and therapy survival rates out to 15 years for large cohorts of DBS, VNS, and SCS patients. Their results demonstrate higher device and therapy survival rates for DBS and VNS than for SCS. Hardware failures were more common among SCS patients, which may have played a role in the discontinuation of therapy. Higher therapy survival than device survival across all modalities indicates continued therapeutic benefit beyond initial device failures, which is important to emphasize when counseling patients.
AB - OBJECTIVE Despite rapid development and expansion of neuromodulation technologies, knowledge about device and/ or therapy durability remains limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term rate of hardware and therapeutic failure of implanted devices for several neuromodulation therapies. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients’ device and therapy survival data (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) for deep brain stimulation (DBS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at a single institution (years 1994–2015). RESULTS During the study period, 450 patients underwent DBS, 383 VNS, and 128 SCS. For DBS, the 5- and 10-year initial device survival was 87% and 73%, respectively, and therapy survival was 96% and 91%, respectively. For VNS, the 5- and 10-year initial device survival was 90% and 70%, respectively, and therapy survival was 99% and 97%, respectively. For SCS, the 5- and 10-year initial device survival was 50% and 34%, respectively, and therapy survival was 74% and 56%, respectively. The average initial device survival for DBS, VNS, and SCS was 14 years, 14 years, and 8 years while mean therapy survival was 18 years, 18 years, and 12.5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The authors report, for the first time, comparative device and therapy survival rates out to 15 years for large cohorts of DBS, VNS, and SCS patients. Their results demonstrate higher device and therapy survival rates for DBS and VNS than for SCS. Hardware failures were more common among SCS patients, which may have played a role in the discontinuation of therapy. Higher therapy survival than device survival across all modalities indicates continued therapeutic benefit beyond initial device failures, which is important to emphasize when counseling patients.
KW - Device
KW - Functional neurosurgery
KW - Neuromodulation
KW - Survival
KW - Technology
KW - Therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084229665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084229665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3171/2019.2.JNS182450
DO - 10.3171/2019.2.JNS182450
M3 - Article
C2 - 31003217
AN - SCOPUS:85084229665
SN - 0022-3085
VL - 132
SP - 1385
EP - 1391
JO - Journal of Neurosurgery
JF - Journal of Neurosurgery
IS - 5
ER -