Multi-site PCR-based CMV viral load assessment-assays demonstrate linearity and precision, but lack numeric standardization

A report of the association for molecular pathology

Daynna J. Wolff, Denise LaMarche Heaney, Paul D. Neuwald, Kathleen A. Stellrecht, Richard Press

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Viral load (VL) assessment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) by real-time PCR is an important tool for diagnosing and monitoring CMV viremia in patients with compromised immune systems. We report results from a sample exchange organized by members of the Association for Molecular Pathology that compared PCR results from 23 laboratories; 22 such laboratories used a laboratory-developed real-time PCR assay and one laboratory used a competitive PCR assay. The samples sent to each laboratory were comprised of a dilution panel of CMV virion-derived reference materials that ranged from 0 to 500,000 copies/ml. Accuracy, linearity, and intralaboratory precision were established for the different laboratory-developed assays. Overall, PCR results were linear for each laboratory (R2 > 0.97 in all but two). While 13 laboratories showed no significant quantitative assay bias, 10 laboratories reported VLs that were significantly different compared with expected values (bias range, -0.82 to 1.4 logs). The intralaboratory precision [mean coefficient of variance of 2% to 5% (log-scale)] suggested that changes in VLs of less than 3- to five-fold may not be significantly different. There was no significant association between laboratory-specific technical variables (PCR platform, calibrator, extraction method) and assay linearity or accuracy. These data suggested that, within each laboratory, relative VL values were linear, but additional method standardization and a CMV DNA reference standard are needed to allow laboratories to achieve comparable numeric results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-92
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Molecular Diagnostics
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Molecular Pathology
Viral Load
Cytomegalovirus
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Viremia
Virion
Immune System

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Multi-site PCR-based CMV viral load assessment-assays demonstrate linearity and precision, but lack numeric standardization : A report of the association for molecular pathology. / Wolff, Daynna J.; Heaney, Denise LaMarche; Neuwald, Paul D.; Stellrecht, Kathleen A.; Press, Richard.

In: Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, Vol. 11, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 87-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{415cbe5a7f604e2b9a1a31707efecd01,
title = "Multi-site PCR-based CMV viral load assessment-assays demonstrate linearity and precision, but lack numeric standardization: A report of the association for molecular pathology",
abstract = "Viral load (VL) assessment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) by real-time PCR is an important tool for diagnosing and monitoring CMV viremia in patients with compromised immune systems. We report results from a sample exchange organized by members of the Association for Molecular Pathology that compared PCR results from 23 laboratories; 22 such laboratories used a laboratory-developed real-time PCR assay and one laboratory used a competitive PCR assay. The samples sent to each laboratory were comprised of a dilution panel of CMV virion-derived reference materials that ranged from 0 to 500,000 copies/ml. Accuracy, linearity, and intralaboratory precision were established for the different laboratory-developed assays. Overall, PCR results were linear for each laboratory (R2 > 0.97 in all but two). While 13 laboratories showed no significant quantitative assay bias, 10 laboratories reported VLs that were significantly different compared with expected values (bias range, -0.82 to 1.4 logs). The intralaboratory precision [mean coefficient of variance of 2{\%} to 5{\%} (log-scale)] suggested that changes in VLs of less than 3- to five-fold may not be significantly different. There was no significant association between laboratory-specific technical variables (PCR platform, calibrator, extraction method) and assay linearity or accuracy. These data suggested that, within each laboratory, relative VL values were linear, but additional method standardization and a CMV DNA reference standard are needed to allow laboratories to achieve comparable numeric results.",
author = "Wolff, {Daynna J.} and Heaney, {Denise LaMarche} and Neuwald, {Paul D.} and Stellrecht, {Kathleen A.} and Richard Press",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080097",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "87--92",
journal = "Journal of Molecular Diagnostics",
issn = "1525-1578",
publisher = "Association of Molecular Pathology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-site PCR-based CMV viral load assessment-assays demonstrate linearity and precision, but lack numeric standardization

T2 - A report of the association for molecular pathology

AU - Wolff, Daynna J.

AU - Heaney, Denise LaMarche

AU - Neuwald, Paul D.

AU - Stellrecht, Kathleen A.

AU - Press, Richard

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Viral load (VL) assessment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) by real-time PCR is an important tool for diagnosing and monitoring CMV viremia in patients with compromised immune systems. We report results from a sample exchange organized by members of the Association for Molecular Pathology that compared PCR results from 23 laboratories; 22 such laboratories used a laboratory-developed real-time PCR assay and one laboratory used a competitive PCR assay. The samples sent to each laboratory were comprised of a dilution panel of CMV virion-derived reference materials that ranged from 0 to 500,000 copies/ml. Accuracy, linearity, and intralaboratory precision were established for the different laboratory-developed assays. Overall, PCR results were linear for each laboratory (R2 > 0.97 in all but two). While 13 laboratories showed no significant quantitative assay bias, 10 laboratories reported VLs that were significantly different compared with expected values (bias range, -0.82 to 1.4 logs). The intralaboratory precision [mean coefficient of variance of 2% to 5% (log-scale)] suggested that changes in VLs of less than 3- to five-fold may not be significantly different. There was no significant association between laboratory-specific technical variables (PCR platform, calibrator, extraction method) and assay linearity or accuracy. These data suggested that, within each laboratory, relative VL values were linear, but additional method standardization and a CMV DNA reference standard are needed to allow laboratories to achieve comparable numeric results.

AB - Viral load (VL) assessment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) by real-time PCR is an important tool for diagnosing and monitoring CMV viremia in patients with compromised immune systems. We report results from a sample exchange organized by members of the Association for Molecular Pathology that compared PCR results from 23 laboratories; 22 such laboratories used a laboratory-developed real-time PCR assay and one laboratory used a competitive PCR assay. The samples sent to each laboratory were comprised of a dilution panel of CMV virion-derived reference materials that ranged from 0 to 500,000 copies/ml. Accuracy, linearity, and intralaboratory precision were established for the different laboratory-developed assays. Overall, PCR results were linear for each laboratory (R2 > 0.97 in all but two). While 13 laboratories showed no significant quantitative assay bias, 10 laboratories reported VLs that were significantly different compared with expected values (bias range, -0.82 to 1.4 logs). The intralaboratory precision [mean coefficient of variance of 2% to 5% (log-scale)] suggested that changes in VLs of less than 3- to five-fold may not be significantly different. There was no significant association between laboratory-specific technical variables (PCR platform, calibrator, extraction method) and assay linearity or accuracy. These data suggested that, within each laboratory, relative VL values were linear, but additional method standardization and a CMV DNA reference standard are needed to allow laboratories to achieve comparable numeric results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64249116301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64249116301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080097

DO - 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080097

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 87

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics

JF - Journal of Molecular Diagnostics

SN - 1525-1578

IS - 2

ER -