MR angiography of tibial runoff vessels: Imaging with the head coil compared with conventional arteriography

Eric D. Cortell, John Kaufman, Stuart C. Geller, Richard P. Cambria, S. Mitchell Rivitz, Arthur C. Waltman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. We compared peripheral vascular MR angiography done with a standard transmit-receive head coil with conventional arteriography for identifying and evaluating runoff vessels below the knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We examined 55 legs in 31 symptomatic patients with both conventional contrast angiography and gradient-echo two-dimensional time-of- fight MR angiography. Both legs of patients were placed in a standard transmit-receive head coil for MR angiography and were imaged simultaneously. For evaluation of stenoses, images of vessels were divided into 10 segments, and each segments was graded on a four point scale. RESULTS. In the 393 native segments evaluated, the sensitivity of MR angiography in identifying normal vessels was 95% and the specificity was 98%. In detecting segmental occlusion, MR angiography was 98% sensitive and 97% specific. Sensitivity and specificity for stenoses greater than 75% were 98% and 96%, respectively, and for stenoses greater than 50%, they were 98% and 95%, respectively. Interpretative discrepancies were found in 35 vessel segments in 18 legs; none was of clinical relevance. Of all vessel segments shown as occluded by conventional angiography, 1% appeared patent on MR angiograms. No vessel segments shown as normal on MR angiograms were found to be concluded on conventional angiograms. CONCLUSION. When performed simultaneously on both legs of symptomatic patients, 2D time-of-flight MR angiography with a standard transmit-receive head coil provides a time-efficient and highly sensitive and specific means of evaluating below-knee runoff.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-151
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume167
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Angiography
Head
Leg
Pathologic Constriction
Knee
Blood Vessels
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Cortell, E. D., Kaufman, J., Geller, S. C., Cambria, R. P., Rivitz, S. M., & Waltman, A. C. (1996). MR angiography of tibial runoff vessels: Imaging with the head coil compared with conventional arteriography. American Journal of Roentgenology, 167(1), 147-151.

MR angiography of tibial runoff vessels : Imaging with the head coil compared with conventional arteriography. / Cortell, Eric D.; Kaufman, John; Geller, Stuart C.; Cambria, Richard P.; Rivitz, S. Mitchell; Waltman, Arthur C.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 167, No. 1, 07.1996, p. 147-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cortell, ED, Kaufman, J, Geller, SC, Cambria, RP, Rivitz, SM & Waltman, AC 1996, 'MR angiography of tibial runoff vessels: Imaging with the head coil compared with conventional arteriography', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 147-151.
Cortell, Eric D. ; Kaufman, John ; Geller, Stuart C. ; Cambria, Richard P. ; Rivitz, S. Mitchell ; Waltman, Arthur C. / MR angiography of tibial runoff vessels : Imaging with the head coil compared with conventional arteriography. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1996 ; Vol. 167, No. 1. pp. 147-151.
@article{fa7e8c615f9c40f7acbb82a417375a8d,
title = "MR angiography of tibial runoff vessels: Imaging with the head coil compared with conventional arteriography",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. We compared peripheral vascular MR angiography done with a standard transmit-receive head coil with conventional arteriography for identifying and evaluating runoff vessels below the knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We examined 55 legs in 31 symptomatic patients with both conventional contrast angiography and gradient-echo two-dimensional time-of- fight MR angiography. Both legs of patients were placed in a standard transmit-receive head coil for MR angiography and were imaged simultaneously. For evaluation of stenoses, images of vessels were divided into 10 segments, and each segments was graded on a four point scale. RESULTS. In the 393 native segments evaluated, the sensitivity of MR angiography in identifying normal vessels was 95{\%} and the specificity was 98{\%}. In detecting segmental occlusion, MR angiography was 98{\%} sensitive and 97{\%} specific. Sensitivity and specificity for stenoses greater than 75{\%} were 98{\%} and 96{\%}, respectively, and for stenoses greater than 50{\%}, they were 98{\%} and 95{\%}, respectively. Interpretative discrepancies were found in 35 vessel segments in 18 legs; none was of clinical relevance. Of all vessel segments shown as occluded by conventional angiography, 1{\%} appeared patent on MR angiograms. No vessel segments shown as normal on MR angiograms were found to be concluded on conventional angiograms. CONCLUSION. When performed simultaneously on both legs of symptomatic patients, 2D time-of-flight MR angiography with a standard transmit-receive head coil provides a time-efficient and highly sensitive and specific means of evaluating below-knee runoff.",
author = "Cortell, {Eric D.} and John Kaufman and Geller, {Stuart C.} and Cambria, {Richard P.} and Rivitz, {S. Mitchell} and Waltman, {Arthur C.}",
year = "1996",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "167",
pages = "147--151",
journal = "AJR. American journal of roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MR angiography of tibial runoff vessels

T2 - Imaging with the head coil compared with conventional arteriography

AU - Cortell, Eric D.

AU - Kaufman, John

AU - Geller, Stuart C.

AU - Cambria, Richard P.

AU - Rivitz, S. Mitchell

AU - Waltman, Arthur C.

PY - 1996/7

Y1 - 1996/7

N2 - OBJECTIVE. We compared peripheral vascular MR angiography done with a standard transmit-receive head coil with conventional arteriography for identifying and evaluating runoff vessels below the knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We examined 55 legs in 31 symptomatic patients with both conventional contrast angiography and gradient-echo two-dimensional time-of- fight MR angiography. Both legs of patients were placed in a standard transmit-receive head coil for MR angiography and were imaged simultaneously. For evaluation of stenoses, images of vessels were divided into 10 segments, and each segments was graded on a four point scale. RESULTS. In the 393 native segments evaluated, the sensitivity of MR angiography in identifying normal vessels was 95% and the specificity was 98%. In detecting segmental occlusion, MR angiography was 98% sensitive and 97% specific. Sensitivity and specificity for stenoses greater than 75% were 98% and 96%, respectively, and for stenoses greater than 50%, they were 98% and 95%, respectively. Interpretative discrepancies were found in 35 vessel segments in 18 legs; none was of clinical relevance. Of all vessel segments shown as occluded by conventional angiography, 1% appeared patent on MR angiograms. No vessel segments shown as normal on MR angiograms were found to be concluded on conventional angiograms. CONCLUSION. When performed simultaneously on both legs of symptomatic patients, 2D time-of-flight MR angiography with a standard transmit-receive head coil provides a time-efficient and highly sensitive and specific means of evaluating below-knee runoff.

AB - OBJECTIVE. We compared peripheral vascular MR angiography done with a standard transmit-receive head coil with conventional arteriography for identifying and evaluating runoff vessels below the knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We examined 55 legs in 31 symptomatic patients with both conventional contrast angiography and gradient-echo two-dimensional time-of- fight MR angiography. Both legs of patients were placed in a standard transmit-receive head coil for MR angiography and were imaged simultaneously. For evaluation of stenoses, images of vessels were divided into 10 segments, and each segments was graded on a four point scale. RESULTS. In the 393 native segments evaluated, the sensitivity of MR angiography in identifying normal vessels was 95% and the specificity was 98%. In detecting segmental occlusion, MR angiography was 98% sensitive and 97% specific. Sensitivity and specificity for stenoses greater than 75% were 98% and 96%, respectively, and for stenoses greater than 50%, they were 98% and 95%, respectively. Interpretative discrepancies were found in 35 vessel segments in 18 legs; none was of clinical relevance. Of all vessel segments shown as occluded by conventional angiography, 1% appeared patent on MR angiograms. No vessel segments shown as normal on MR angiograms were found to be concluded on conventional angiograms. CONCLUSION. When performed simultaneously on both legs of symptomatic patients, 2D time-of-flight MR angiography with a standard transmit-receive head coil provides a time-efficient and highly sensitive and specific means of evaluating below-knee runoff.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029888851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029888851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8659360

AN - SCOPUS:0029888851

VL - 167

SP - 147

EP - 151

JO - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

JF - AJR. American journal of roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 1

ER -