Money well spent: A comparison of hospital operating margin for laparoscopic and open colectomies

Matthew Koopman, B. A. Harms, C. P. Heise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Cost analysis after laparoscopic colectomy has been examined, although reports evaluating the effects of laparoscopy on hospital operating margin are lacking. We compared several cost/revenue measures, including hospital operating margin, between open and laparoscopic colectomies at an academic center. Methods: Our cost-accounting database was queried for laparoscopic partial (LPC) and total colectomies (LTC), and open partial (OPC) and total colectomies (OTC) to analyze net revenue, total costs, and total hospital operating margin over a 4-year period. Laparoscopic and open colectomy cases were compared, with mean operating margin as the primary outcome. Results: From July, 2002 through May, 2006, 842 patients were included for analysis with 138 undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Net revenue was higher in the LTC group compared with open ($30,300 vs $26,800 [P = .02]), and lower in the LPC group ($15,300 vs $21,300 open [P < .0001]). Total costs were reduced in both the LPC and LTC groups compared with open [$11,700 vs $17,600 [P < .0001] and $18,000 vs $19,400 [P = .0019], respectively). LPC resulted in a similar HOM ($3,602) compared with OPC ($3,647; P = .35). LTC resulted in a higher HOM ($12,300) compared with OTC ($7,400; P = .02). Conclusions: LTC generates a significantly higher hospital operating margin than an OTC, although the margins are similar for LPC and OPC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)546-555
Number of pages10
JournalSurgery
Volume142
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colectomy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Hospital Costs
Laparoscopy
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Money well spent : A comparison of hospital operating margin for laparoscopic and open colectomies. / Koopman, Matthew; Harms, B. A.; Heise, C. P.

In: Surgery, Vol. 142, No. 4, 01.10.2007, p. 546-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bef50077b3af43659e4d7eec82aaddbb,
title = "Money well spent: A comparison of hospital operating margin for laparoscopic and open colectomies",
abstract = "Background: Cost analysis after laparoscopic colectomy has been examined, although reports evaluating the effects of laparoscopy on hospital operating margin are lacking. We compared several cost/revenue measures, including hospital operating margin, between open and laparoscopic colectomies at an academic center. Methods: Our cost-accounting database was queried for laparoscopic partial (LPC) and total colectomies (LTC), and open partial (OPC) and total colectomies (OTC) to analyze net revenue, total costs, and total hospital operating margin over a 4-year period. Laparoscopic and open colectomy cases were compared, with mean operating margin as the primary outcome. Results: From July, 2002 through May, 2006, 842 patients were included for analysis with 138 undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Net revenue was higher in the LTC group compared with open ($30,300 vs $26,800 [P = .02]), and lower in the LPC group ($15,300 vs $21,300 open [P < .0001]). Total costs were reduced in both the LPC and LTC groups compared with open [$11,700 vs $17,600 [P < .0001] and $18,000 vs $19,400 [P = .0019], respectively). LPC resulted in a similar HOM ($3,602) compared with OPC ($3,647; P = .35). LTC resulted in a higher HOM ($12,300) compared with OTC ($7,400; P = .02). Conclusions: LTC generates a significantly higher hospital operating margin than an OTC, although the margins are similar for LPC and OPC.",
author = "Matthew Koopman and Harms, {B. A.} and Heise, {C. P.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "546--555",
journal = "Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0039-6060",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Money well spent

T2 - A comparison of hospital operating margin for laparoscopic and open colectomies

AU - Koopman, Matthew

AU - Harms, B. A.

AU - Heise, C. P.

PY - 2007/10/1

Y1 - 2007/10/1

N2 - Background: Cost analysis after laparoscopic colectomy has been examined, although reports evaluating the effects of laparoscopy on hospital operating margin are lacking. We compared several cost/revenue measures, including hospital operating margin, between open and laparoscopic colectomies at an academic center. Methods: Our cost-accounting database was queried for laparoscopic partial (LPC) and total colectomies (LTC), and open partial (OPC) and total colectomies (OTC) to analyze net revenue, total costs, and total hospital operating margin over a 4-year period. Laparoscopic and open colectomy cases were compared, with mean operating margin as the primary outcome. Results: From July, 2002 through May, 2006, 842 patients were included for analysis with 138 undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Net revenue was higher in the LTC group compared with open ($30,300 vs $26,800 [P = .02]), and lower in the LPC group ($15,300 vs $21,300 open [P < .0001]). Total costs were reduced in both the LPC and LTC groups compared with open [$11,700 vs $17,600 [P < .0001] and $18,000 vs $19,400 [P = .0019], respectively). LPC resulted in a similar HOM ($3,602) compared with OPC ($3,647; P = .35). LTC resulted in a higher HOM ($12,300) compared with OTC ($7,400; P = .02). Conclusions: LTC generates a significantly higher hospital operating margin than an OTC, although the margins are similar for LPC and OPC.

AB - Background: Cost analysis after laparoscopic colectomy has been examined, although reports evaluating the effects of laparoscopy on hospital operating margin are lacking. We compared several cost/revenue measures, including hospital operating margin, between open and laparoscopic colectomies at an academic center. Methods: Our cost-accounting database was queried for laparoscopic partial (LPC) and total colectomies (LTC), and open partial (OPC) and total colectomies (OTC) to analyze net revenue, total costs, and total hospital operating margin over a 4-year period. Laparoscopic and open colectomy cases were compared, with mean operating margin as the primary outcome. Results: From July, 2002 through May, 2006, 842 patients were included for analysis with 138 undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Net revenue was higher in the LTC group compared with open ($30,300 vs $26,800 [P = .02]), and lower in the LPC group ($15,300 vs $21,300 open [P < .0001]). Total costs were reduced in both the LPC and LTC groups compared with open [$11,700 vs $17,600 [P < .0001] and $18,000 vs $19,400 [P = .0019], respectively). LPC resulted in a similar HOM ($3,602) compared with OPC ($3,647; P = .35). LTC resulted in a higher HOM ($12,300) compared with OTC ($7,400; P = .02). Conclusions: LTC generates a significantly higher hospital operating margin than an OTC, although the margins are similar for LPC and OPC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35348854343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35348854343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.014

DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 17950347

AN - SCOPUS:35348854343

VL - 142

SP - 546

EP - 555

JO - Surgery (United States)

JF - Surgery (United States)

SN - 0039-6060

IS - 4

ER -