Background: Limited guidance exists regarding appropriate timing for feed initiation and advancement in gastroschisis. We hypothesized that implementation of a gastroschisis management protocol would allow for standardization of antibiotic and nutritional treatment for these patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparison of patients with simple gastroschisis at two pediatric hospitals before and after initiation of our gastroschisis care protocol. Complicated gastroschisis and early mortality were excluded. The control group extended from January 2012 to January 2014 and the protocol group from July 2014 to July 2016. Variables of interest included time to feed initiation, time to goal feeds, length of stay, and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program–defined complications. We performed a subgroup analysis for primary versus delayed gastroschisis closure. Statistical analyses, including F-tests for variance, were conducted in Prism. Results: Forty-seven patients with simple gastroschisis were included (control = 22, protocol = 25). Protocol compliance was 76% with no increase in complication rates. There was no difference in length of stay or time from initiation to full feeds overall between the control and protocol groups. However, neonates who underwent delayed closure reached full feeds significantly earlier, averaging 9 d versus 15 d previously (P = 0.04). Conclusions: For infants undergoing delayed closure, the time to full feeds in this group now appears to match that of patients undergoing primary closure, indicating that delayed closure should not be a reason for slower advancement. Additional studies are needed to assess the impact of earlier full enteral nutrition on rare complications and rates of necrotizing enterocolitis.
- Feeding protocol
ASJC Scopus subject areas