Methods and challenges in timing chromosomal abnormalities within cancer samples.

Elizabeth Purdom, Christine Ho, Catherine S. Grasso, Michael J. Quist, Raymond J. Cho, Paul Spellman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tumors acquire many chromosomal amplifications, and those acquired early in the lifespan of the tumor may be not only important for tumor growth but also can be used for diagnostic purposes. Many methods infer the order of the accumulation of abnormalities based on their occurrence in a large cohort of patients. Recently, Durinck et al. (2011) and Greenman et al. (2012) developed methods to order a single tumor's chromosomal amplifications based on the patterns of mutations accumulated within those regions. This method offers an unprecedented opportunity to assess the etiology of a single tumor sample, but has not been widely evaluated. We show that the model for timing chromosomal amplifications is limited in scope, particularly for regions with high levels of amplification. We also show that the estimation of the order of events can be sensitive for events that occur early in the progression of the tumor and that the partial maximum likelihood method of Greenman et al. (2012) can give biased estimates, particularly for moderate read coverage or normal contamination. We propose a maximum-likelihood estimation procedure that fully accounts for sequencing variability and show that it outperforms the partial maximum-likelihood estimation method. We also propose a Bayesian estimation procedure that stabilizes the estimates in certain settings. We implement these methods on a small number of ovarian tumors, and the results suggest possible differences in how the tumors acquired amplifications. We provide implementation of these methods in an R package cancerTiming, which is available from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at http://CRAN.R-project.org/.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3113-3120
Number of pages8
JournalBioinformatics (Oxford, England)
Volume29
Issue number24
StatePublished - Dec 15 2013

Fingerprint

Chromosome Aberrations
Tumors
Timing
Tumor
Cancer
Amplification
Neoplasms
Partial Likelihood
Maximum likelihood estimation
Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Tumor Growth
Life Span
Maximum Likelihood Method
Bayesian Estimation
Contamination
Progression
Estimate
Sequencing
Biased
Diagnostics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Purdom, E., Ho, C., Grasso, C. S., Quist, M. J., Cho, R. J., & Spellman, P. (2013). Methods and challenges in timing chromosomal abnormalities within cancer samples. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 29(24), 3113-3120.

Methods and challenges in timing chromosomal abnormalities within cancer samples. / Purdom, Elizabeth; Ho, Christine; Grasso, Catherine S.; Quist, Michael J.; Cho, Raymond J.; Spellman, Paul.

In: Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), Vol. 29, No. 24, 15.12.2013, p. 3113-3120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Purdom, E, Ho, C, Grasso, CS, Quist, MJ, Cho, RJ & Spellman, P 2013, 'Methods and challenges in timing chromosomal abnormalities within cancer samples.', Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), vol. 29, no. 24, pp. 3113-3120.
Purdom, Elizabeth ; Ho, Christine ; Grasso, Catherine S. ; Quist, Michael J. ; Cho, Raymond J. ; Spellman, Paul. / Methods and challenges in timing chromosomal abnormalities within cancer samples. In: Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2013 ; Vol. 29, No. 24. pp. 3113-3120.
@article{4f4046f2e93c46a6894ce35bf33953da,
title = "Methods and challenges in timing chromosomal abnormalities within cancer samples.",
abstract = "Tumors acquire many chromosomal amplifications, and those acquired early in the lifespan of the tumor may be not only important for tumor growth but also can be used for diagnostic purposes. Many methods infer the order of the accumulation of abnormalities based on their occurrence in a large cohort of patients. Recently, Durinck et al. (2011) and Greenman et al. (2012) developed methods to order a single tumor's chromosomal amplifications based on the patterns of mutations accumulated within those regions. This method offers an unprecedented opportunity to assess the etiology of a single tumor sample, but has not been widely evaluated. We show that the model for timing chromosomal amplifications is limited in scope, particularly for regions with high levels of amplification. We also show that the estimation of the order of events can be sensitive for events that occur early in the progression of the tumor and that the partial maximum likelihood method of Greenman et al. (2012) can give biased estimates, particularly for moderate read coverage or normal contamination. We propose a maximum-likelihood estimation procedure that fully accounts for sequencing variability and show that it outperforms the partial maximum-likelihood estimation method. We also propose a Bayesian estimation procedure that stabilizes the estimates in certain settings. We implement these methods on a small number of ovarian tumors, and the results suggest possible differences in how the tumors acquired amplifications. We provide implementation of these methods in an R package cancerTiming, which is available from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at http://CRAN.R-project.org/.",
author = "Elizabeth Purdom and Christine Ho and Grasso, {Catherine S.} and Quist, {Michael J.} and Cho, {Raymond J.} and Paul Spellman",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "3113--3120",
journal = "Bioinformatics",
issn = "1367-4803",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "24",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods and challenges in timing chromosomal abnormalities within cancer samples.

AU - Purdom, Elizabeth

AU - Ho, Christine

AU - Grasso, Catherine S.

AU - Quist, Michael J.

AU - Cho, Raymond J.

AU - Spellman, Paul

PY - 2013/12/15

Y1 - 2013/12/15

N2 - Tumors acquire many chromosomal amplifications, and those acquired early in the lifespan of the tumor may be not only important for tumor growth but also can be used for diagnostic purposes. Many methods infer the order of the accumulation of abnormalities based on their occurrence in a large cohort of patients. Recently, Durinck et al. (2011) and Greenman et al. (2012) developed methods to order a single tumor's chromosomal amplifications based on the patterns of mutations accumulated within those regions. This method offers an unprecedented opportunity to assess the etiology of a single tumor sample, but has not been widely evaluated. We show that the model for timing chromosomal amplifications is limited in scope, particularly for regions with high levels of amplification. We also show that the estimation of the order of events can be sensitive for events that occur early in the progression of the tumor and that the partial maximum likelihood method of Greenman et al. (2012) can give biased estimates, particularly for moderate read coverage or normal contamination. We propose a maximum-likelihood estimation procedure that fully accounts for sequencing variability and show that it outperforms the partial maximum-likelihood estimation method. We also propose a Bayesian estimation procedure that stabilizes the estimates in certain settings. We implement these methods on a small number of ovarian tumors, and the results suggest possible differences in how the tumors acquired amplifications. We provide implementation of these methods in an R package cancerTiming, which is available from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at http://CRAN.R-project.org/.

AB - Tumors acquire many chromosomal amplifications, and those acquired early in the lifespan of the tumor may be not only important for tumor growth but also can be used for diagnostic purposes. Many methods infer the order of the accumulation of abnormalities based on their occurrence in a large cohort of patients. Recently, Durinck et al. (2011) and Greenman et al. (2012) developed methods to order a single tumor's chromosomal amplifications based on the patterns of mutations accumulated within those regions. This method offers an unprecedented opportunity to assess the etiology of a single tumor sample, but has not been widely evaluated. We show that the model for timing chromosomal amplifications is limited in scope, particularly for regions with high levels of amplification. We also show that the estimation of the order of events can be sensitive for events that occur early in the progression of the tumor and that the partial maximum likelihood method of Greenman et al. (2012) can give biased estimates, particularly for moderate read coverage or normal contamination. We propose a maximum-likelihood estimation procedure that fully accounts for sequencing variability and show that it outperforms the partial maximum-likelihood estimation method. We also propose a Bayesian estimation procedure that stabilizes the estimates in certain settings. We implement these methods on a small number of ovarian tumors, and the results suggest possible differences in how the tumors acquired amplifications. We provide implementation of these methods in an R package cancerTiming, which is available from the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN) at http://CRAN.R-project.org/.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900374826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900374826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 24064421

AN - SCOPUS:84900374826

VL - 29

SP - 3113

EP - 3120

JO - Bioinformatics

JF - Bioinformatics

SN - 1367-4803

IS - 24

ER -