Mechanical stiffness of segmental versus nonsegmental pedicle screw constructs: The effect of cross-links

Robert Hart, Werner Hettwer, Qi Liu, Shilpa Prem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design. A biomechanical study in porcine spines of the construct stiffness effects of segmental pedicle screws. Stiffness effects of supplementation of non-segmental screw constructs with cross-links was also evaluated. Objective. To assess the biomechanical differences between constructs using segmental versus nonsegmental pedicle screw-based instrumentation as well as the effect of cross-links. Summary of Background Data. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of segmental versus nonsegmental pedicle screw constructs with and without cross-links using porcine lumbar vertebrae was performed. Mechanical trade-offs of reducing the number of pedicle screws in a given construct and substituting a cross-link for a pair of screws are not well understood. Methods. Three, 4, and 5-vertebral segments from 18 porcine spines were instrumented with segmental and nonsegmental pedicle screw constructs, and with non-segmental screws augmented with cross-links. Unconstrained biomechanical testing in flexion, extension, and axial rotation with 6 degree-of-freedom motion tracking was performed. Statistical comparisons of stiffness data were conducted using 2-tailed paired t tests. Results. There was a statistically significant increase in stiffness between models with segmental pedicle screws compared to nonsegmental pedicle screws in 6 of the 9 mechanical tests. The remaining 3 tests approached but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.087, 0.062, and 0.078). When cross-links were added to the nonsegmental models, differences in stiffness compared to segmental pedicle screws were largely eliminated, decreasing well below statistical significance in 8 of 9 tests. The highest difference in nonsegmental models with cross-links and segmental pedicle screw models was observed for the 5-vertebrae fusion models, for which axial rotation testing maintained statistically significant differences (P = 0.006), and flexion testing approached significance (P = 0.062). Conclusions. Segmental pedicle screw constructs increased mechanical stiffness compared to nonsegmental constructs in our fusion models. Placement of a single cross-link with nonsegmental screws eliminated statistical differences for 3 and 4-vertebral level constructs, and may be a satisfactory alternative in this clinical setting. Caution in applying these results in longer constructs is recommended, given persistent increased stiffness found for the segmental 5-vertebral level models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E35-E38
JournalSpine
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Cross-links
  • Lumbar spine
  • Pedicle screws
  • Spinal-fusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanical stiffness of segmental versus nonsegmental pedicle screw constructs: The effect of cross-links'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this