Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease

Richard (Rick) Deyo, Thomas S. Inui, Jyl D. Leininger, Steven S. Overman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

132 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A new health-status questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), was examined to determine whether it offered measurement advantages over the traditional American Rheumatism Association (ARA) functional scale or patient self-ratings of function. Seventy-nine outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) administered the SIP to themselves and provided self-ratings on a 7-point functional scale. Clinicians independently rated patients on the ARA functional scale, and repeated measures were obtained over a 6-month period. Scores on the SIP or its suhscales showed stronger correlations than the other scales with hematocrit, sedimentation rate, grip strength, morning stiffness, duration of RA, anatomic stage, work status, and psychiatric status. Validity of the SIP appeared to be maintained with repeated administrations, and the SIP was more reliable than either of the other scales. These findings, as well as the comprehensiveness and feasibility of the self-administered SIP, suggest that this (and perhaps similar health status instruments) may be a useful supplement to more traditional measures of chronic disease outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-192
Number of pages13
JournalMedical Care
Volume21
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sickness Impact Profile
Chronic Disease
illness
Disease
rheumatism
Rheumatic Diseases
Health Status
health status
Rheumatoid Arthritis
rating
Hand Strength
Hematocrit
supplement
Psychiatry
Outpatients
questionnaire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Deyo, R. R., Inui, T. S., Leininger, J. D., & Overman, S. S. (1983). Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease. Medical Care, 21(2), 180-192.

Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease. / Deyo, Richard (Rick); Inui, Thomas S.; Leininger, Jyl D.; Overman, Steven S.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1983, p. 180-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deyo, RR, Inui, TS, Leininger, JD & Overman, SS 1983, 'Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease', Medical Care, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 180-192.
Deyo RR, Inui TS, Leininger JD, Overman SS. Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease. Medical Care. 1983;21(2):180-192.
Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Inui, Thomas S. ; Leininger, Jyl D. ; Overman, Steven S. / Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease. In: Medical Care. 1983 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 180-192.
@article{aafe73b456a94976a4b3f085e9f11583,
title = "Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease",
abstract = "A new health-status questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), was examined to determine whether it offered measurement advantages over the traditional American Rheumatism Association (ARA) functional scale or patient self-ratings of function. Seventy-nine outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) administered the SIP to themselves and provided self-ratings on a 7-point functional scale. Clinicians independently rated patients on the ARA functional scale, and repeated measures were obtained over a 6-month period. Scores on the SIP or its suhscales showed stronger correlations than the other scales with hematocrit, sedimentation rate, grip strength, morning stiffness, duration of RA, anatomic stage, work status, and psychiatric status. Validity of the SIP appeared to be maintained with repeated administrations, and the SIP was more reliable than either of the other scales. These findings, as well as the comprehensiveness and feasibility of the self-administered SIP, suggest that this (and perhaps similar health status instruments) may be a useful supplement to more traditional measures of chronic disease outcome.",
author = "Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Inui, {Thomas S.} and Leininger, {Jyl D.} and Overman, {Steven S.}",
year = "1983",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "180--192",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Inui, Thomas S.

AU - Leininger, Jyl D.

AU - Overman, Steven S.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - A new health-status questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), was examined to determine whether it offered measurement advantages over the traditional American Rheumatism Association (ARA) functional scale or patient self-ratings of function. Seventy-nine outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) administered the SIP to themselves and provided self-ratings on a 7-point functional scale. Clinicians independently rated patients on the ARA functional scale, and repeated measures were obtained over a 6-month period. Scores on the SIP or its suhscales showed stronger correlations than the other scales with hematocrit, sedimentation rate, grip strength, morning stiffness, duration of RA, anatomic stage, work status, and psychiatric status. Validity of the SIP appeared to be maintained with repeated administrations, and the SIP was more reliable than either of the other scales. These findings, as well as the comprehensiveness and feasibility of the self-administered SIP, suggest that this (and perhaps similar health status instruments) may be a useful supplement to more traditional measures of chronic disease outcome.

AB - A new health-status questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), was examined to determine whether it offered measurement advantages over the traditional American Rheumatism Association (ARA) functional scale or patient self-ratings of function. Seventy-nine outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) administered the SIP to themselves and provided self-ratings on a 7-point functional scale. Clinicians independently rated patients on the ARA functional scale, and repeated measures were obtained over a 6-month period. Scores on the SIP or its suhscales showed stronger correlations than the other scales with hematocrit, sedimentation rate, grip strength, morning stiffness, duration of RA, anatomic stage, work status, and psychiatric status. Validity of the SIP appeared to be maintained with repeated administrations, and the SIP was more reliable than either of the other scales. These findings, as well as the comprehensiveness and feasibility of the self-administered SIP, suggest that this (and perhaps similar health status instruments) may be a useful supplement to more traditional measures of chronic disease outcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020546827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020546827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6827872

AN - SCOPUS:0020546827

VL - 21

SP - 180

EP - 192

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 2

ER -