Management of occupational back injuries: Differences among African Americans and Caucasians

Raymond C. Tait, John T. Chibnall, Elena Andresen, Nortin M. Hadler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined differences in the case management of occupational low back injuries in a large, racially diverse population of Workers' Compensation claimants in Missouri. Participants were African Americans (N=580) and non-Hispanic whites (N=892) who had filed occupational injury claims that were settled over an 18-month period. Telephone interview data were gathered regarding diagnoses, legal representation, demographics, and socioeconomic status. The Missouri Division of Workers' Compensation also provided information on medical and temporary disability expenditures, claim duration, final disability ratings, and settlement awards. Simultaneous-entry, hierarchical multiple and logistic regression analyses showed significant and substantial effects for injury-related variables, socioeconomic status, and race across all Workers' Compensation variables. Differences remained for both injury and African Americans and lower socioeconomic status workers after controlling for injury, and for African Americans after controlling for both injury and socioeconomic status. Because Workers' Compensation mandates equal access to treatment and disability reimbursement for all injured workers, the differences observed in this study may reflect sociocultural biases in disability management among healthcare providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-396
Number of pages8
JournalPain
Volume112
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Back Injuries
Occupational Injuries
Workers' Compensation
Social Class
African Americans
Wounds and Injuries
Case Management
Health Expenditures
Health Personnel
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Demography
Interviews
Population

Keywords

  • Disparities
  • Low back pain
  • Occupational injury
  • Treatment
  • Worker's Compensation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Management of occupational back injuries : Differences among African Americans and Caucasians. / Tait, Raymond C.; Chibnall, John T.; Andresen, Elena; Hadler, Nortin M.

In: Pain, Vol. 112, No. 3, 12.2004, p. 389-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tait, Raymond C. ; Chibnall, John T. ; Andresen, Elena ; Hadler, Nortin M. / Management of occupational back injuries : Differences among African Americans and Caucasians. In: Pain. 2004 ; Vol. 112, No. 3. pp. 389-396.
@article{321ab1d4bf9e4dd9a5979546c477ca13,
title = "Management of occupational back injuries: Differences among African Americans and Caucasians",
abstract = "This study examined differences in the case management of occupational low back injuries in a large, racially diverse population of Workers' Compensation claimants in Missouri. Participants were African Americans (N=580) and non-Hispanic whites (N=892) who had filed occupational injury claims that were settled over an 18-month period. Telephone interview data were gathered regarding diagnoses, legal representation, demographics, and socioeconomic status. The Missouri Division of Workers' Compensation also provided information on medical and temporary disability expenditures, claim duration, final disability ratings, and settlement awards. Simultaneous-entry, hierarchical multiple and logistic regression analyses showed significant and substantial effects for injury-related variables, socioeconomic status, and race across all Workers' Compensation variables. Differences remained for both injury and African Americans and lower socioeconomic status workers after controlling for injury, and for African Americans after controlling for both injury and socioeconomic status. Because Workers' Compensation mandates equal access to treatment and disability reimbursement for all injured workers, the differences observed in this study may reflect sociocultural biases in disability management among healthcare providers.",
keywords = "Disparities, Low back pain, Occupational injury, Treatment, Worker's Compensation",
author = "Tait, {Raymond C.} and Chibnall, {John T.} and Elena Andresen and Hadler, {Nortin M.}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "389--396",
journal = "Pain",
issn = "0304-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of occupational back injuries

T2 - Differences among African Americans and Caucasians

AU - Tait, Raymond C.

AU - Chibnall, John T.

AU - Andresen, Elena

AU - Hadler, Nortin M.

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - This study examined differences in the case management of occupational low back injuries in a large, racially diverse population of Workers' Compensation claimants in Missouri. Participants were African Americans (N=580) and non-Hispanic whites (N=892) who had filed occupational injury claims that were settled over an 18-month period. Telephone interview data were gathered regarding diagnoses, legal representation, demographics, and socioeconomic status. The Missouri Division of Workers' Compensation also provided information on medical and temporary disability expenditures, claim duration, final disability ratings, and settlement awards. Simultaneous-entry, hierarchical multiple and logistic regression analyses showed significant and substantial effects for injury-related variables, socioeconomic status, and race across all Workers' Compensation variables. Differences remained for both injury and African Americans and lower socioeconomic status workers after controlling for injury, and for African Americans after controlling for both injury and socioeconomic status. Because Workers' Compensation mandates equal access to treatment and disability reimbursement for all injured workers, the differences observed in this study may reflect sociocultural biases in disability management among healthcare providers.

AB - This study examined differences in the case management of occupational low back injuries in a large, racially diverse population of Workers' Compensation claimants in Missouri. Participants were African Americans (N=580) and non-Hispanic whites (N=892) who had filed occupational injury claims that were settled over an 18-month period. Telephone interview data were gathered regarding diagnoses, legal representation, demographics, and socioeconomic status. The Missouri Division of Workers' Compensation also provided information on medical and temporary disability expenditures, claim duration, final disability ratings, and settlement awards. Simultaneous-entry, hierarchical multiple and logistic regression analyses showed significant and substantial effects for injury-related variables, socioeconomic status, and race across all Workers' Compensation variables. Differences remained for both injury and African Americans and lower socioeconomic status workers after controlling for injury, and for African Americans after controlling for both injury and socioeconomic status. Because Workers' Compensation mandates equal access to treatment and disability reimbursement for all injured workers, the differences observed in this study may reflect sociocultural biases in disability management among healthcare providers.

KW - Disparities

KW - Low back pain

KW - Occupational injury

KW - Treatment

KW - Worker's Compensation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9244248631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9244248631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.027

DO - 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 15561395

AN - SCOPUS:9244248631

VL - 112

SP - 389

EP - 396

JO - Pain

JF - Pain

SN - 0304-3959

IS - 3

ER -