TY - JOUR
T1 - Logic model framework for considering the inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation-research partnership
AU - Tabriz, Amir Alishahi
AU - Flocke, Susan A.
AU - Shires, Deirdre
AU - Dyer, Karen E.
AU - Schreiber, Michelle
AU - Lafata, Jennifer Elston
N1 - Funding Information:
Once funding was secured, an EHR programmer, who reported to the nurse manager, received partial salary coverage from the grant. This ensured regular healthcare staff representation during project meetings, solidified organisational commitment to project success and enhanced information exchange between the healthcare organisation and research team. Including these three individuals within the core project team enabled continual insights into the organisation’s priorities, challenges and strategic directions—each important consideration for multiyear, practice-embedded delivery system science studies.
Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute (grant number R01CA197205).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Author(s) (or their employer(s)). No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Background The published literature provides few insights regarding how to develop or consider the effects of knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science. Objective To describe how a healthcare organisation-university-based research partnership was developed and used to design, develop and implement a practice-integrated decision support tool for patients with a physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening. Design Instrumental case study. Participants Data were ascertained from project documentation records and semistructured questionnaires sent to 16 healthcare organisation leaders and staff, research investigators and research staff members. Results Using a logic model framework, we organised the key inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation-university-based research partnership. In addition to pragmatic researchers, partnership inputs included a healthcare organisation with a supportive practice environment and an executive-level project sponsor, a mid-level manager to serve as the organisational champion and continual access to organisational employees with relevant technical, policy and system/process knowledge. During programme design and implementation, partnership processes included using project team meetings, standing organisational meetings and one-on-one consultancies to provide platforms for shared learning and problem solving. Decision-making responsibility was shared between the healthcare organisation and research team. We discuss the short-term outcomes of the partnership, including how the partnership affected the current research team's knowledge and health system initiatives. Conclusion Using a logic model framework, we have described how a healthcare organisation-university-based research team partnership was developed. Others interested in developing, implementing and evaluating knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science projects can use the experiences to consider ways to develop, implement and evaluate similar co-production partnerships.
AB - Background The published literature provides few insights regarding how to develop or consider the effects of knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science. Objective To describe how a healthcare organisation-university-based research partnership was developed and used to design, develop and implement a practice-integrated decision support tool for patients with a physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening. Design Instrumental case study. Participants Data were ascertained from project documentation records and semistructured questionnaires sent to 16 healthcare organisation leaders and staff, research investigators and research staff members. Results Using a logic model framework, we organised the key inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation-university-based research partnership. In addition to pragmatic researchers, partnership inputs included a healthcare organisation with a supportive practice environment and an executive-level project sponsor, a mid-level manager to serve as the organisational champion and continual access to organisational employees with relevant technical, policy and system/process knowledge. During programme design and implementation, partnership processes included using project team meetings, standing organisational meetings and one-on-one consultancies to provide platforms for shared learning and problem solving. Decision-making responsibility was shared between the healthcare organisation and research team. We discuss the short-term outcomes of the partnership, including how the partnership affected the current research team's knowledge and health system initiatives. Conclusion Using a logic model framework, we have described how a healthcare organisation-university-based research team partnership was developed. Others interested in developing, implementing and evaluating knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science projects can use the experiences to consider ways to develop, implement and evaluate similar co-production partnerships.
KW - delivery system science
KW - health care stakeholder engagement
KW - implementation science
KW - knowledge co-production
KW - quality improvement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076426332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076426332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010059
DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010059
M3 - Article
C2 - 31826921
AN - SCOPUS:85076426332
SN - 2044-5415
VL - 29
SP - 746
EP - 755
JO - Quality in Health Care
JF - Quality in Health Care
IS - 9
ER -