Live surgical demonstrations: An old, but increasingly controversial practice

Brian Duty, Zhamshid Okhunov, Justin Friedlander, Zeph Okeke, Arthur Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To survey a group of leading academic urologists from North America and abroad about their opinions regarding the educational value, safety, and ethics of live surgical demonstrations. Materials and Methods: An anonymous survey pertaining to live clinical demonstrations was sent to all active members of the American Association of Genitourinary Surgeons (AAGUS). Results: Ninety (50%) members completed the survey. Most respondents had performed at least one live surgical demonstration (93.2% at away institution, 81.5% at home institution). Overall anxiety level as a visiting professor was rated as moderate, high, and very high by 29.8%, 25.0%, and 17.9% of respondents, respectively. Anxiety while performing demonstrations at one's home institution was reported as moderate, high, and very high by 28.2%, 9.9%, and 8.5% of respondents, respectively. Excessive conversation in the operating room was cited as a major distraction by 41.3% of respondents. Concern over the appropriateness of selected cases was reported often (43.9%) and always (13.4%) of the time. Only 28.2% of AAGUS members would let a visiting faculty member operate on them or a family member. Most (70.9%) respondents felt live surgical demonstrations are morally ethical, but only 30.1% stated they should continue indefinitely in their present form. Conclusion: No studies have been published within the urological literature about live operative demonstrations. Results from the present survey support concerns within the cardiothoracic and endoscopy literature about the continued use of live operative demonstrations. A formal review culminating in the development of an explicit policy statement by urologists should be undertaken.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalUrology
Volume79
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anxiety
Surveys and Questionnaires
Policy Making
Operating Rooms
North America
Ethics
Endoscopy
Safety
Surgeons
Urologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Live surgical demonstrations : An old, but increasingly controversial practice. / Duty, Brian; Okhunov, Zhamshid; Friedlander, Justin; Okeke, Zeph; Smith, Arthur.

In: Urology, Vol. 79, No. 5, 05.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duty, Brian ; Okhunov, Zhamshid ; Friedlander, Justin ; Okeke, Zeph ; Smith, Arthur. / Live surgical demonstrations : An old, but increasingly controversial practice. In: Urology. 2012 ; Vol. 79, No. 5.
@article{27fcb8a6203a49019389085706443762,
title = "Live surgical demonstrations: An old, but increasingly controversial practice",
abstract = "Objective: To survey a group of leading academic urologists from North America and abroad about their opinions regarding the educational value, safety, and ethics of live surgical demonstrations. Materials and Methods: An anonymous survey pertaining to live clinical demonstrations was sent to all active members of the American Association of Genitourinary Surgeons (AAGUS). Results: Ninety (50{\%}) members completed the survey. Most respondents had performed at least one live surgical demonstration (93.2{\%} at away institution, 81.5{\%} at home institution). Overall anxiety level as a visiting professor was rated as moderate, high, and very high by 29.8{\%}, 25.0{\%}, and 17.9{\%} of respondents, respectively. Anxiety while performing demonstrations at one's home institution was reported as moderate, high, and very high by 28.2{\%}, 9.9{\%}, and 8.5{\%} of respondents, respectively. Excessive conversation in the operating room was cited as a major distraction by 41.3{\%} of respondents. Concern over the appropriateness of selected cases was reported often (43.9{\%}) and always (13.4{\%}) of the time. Only 28.2{\%} of AAGUS members would let a visiting faculty member operate on them or a family member. Most (70.9{\%}) respondents felt live surgical demonstrations are morally ethical, but only 30.1{\%} stated they should continue indefinitely in their present form. Conclusion: No studies have been published within the urological literature about live operative demonstrations. Results from the present survey support concerns within the cardiothoracic and endoscopy literature about the continued use of live operative demonstrations. A formal review culminating in the development of an explicit policy statement by urologists should be undertaken.",
author = "Brian Duty and Zhamshid Okhunov and Justin Friedlander and Zeph Okeke and Arthur Smith",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2011.12.037",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Live surgical demonstrations

T2 - An old, but increasingly controversial practice

AU - Duty, Brian

AU - Okhunov, Zhamshid

AU - Friedlander, Justin

AU - Okeke, Zeph

AU - Smith, Arthur

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - Objective: To survey a group of leading academic urologists from North America and abroad about their opinions regarding the educational value, safety, and ethics of live surgical demonstrations. Materials and Methods: An anonymous survey pertaining to live clinical demonstrations was sent to all active members of the American Association of Genitourinary Surgeons (AAGUS). Results: Ninety (50%) members completed the survey. Most respondents had performed at least one live surgical demonstration (93.2% at away institution, 81.5% at home institution). Overall anxiety level as a visiting professor was rated as moderate, high, and very high by 29.8%, 25.0%, and 17.9% of respondents, respectively. Anxiety while performing demonstrations at one's home institution was reported as moderate, high, and very high by 28.2%, 9.9%, and 8.5% of respondents, respectively. Excessive conversation in the operating room was cited as a major distraction by 41.3% of respondents. Concern over the appropriateness of selected cases was reported often (43.9%) and always (13.4%) of the time. Only 28.2% of AAGUS members would let a visiting faculty member operate on them or a family member. Most (70.9%) respondents felt live surgical demonstrations are morally ethical, but only 30.1% stated they should continue indefinitely in their present form. Conclusion: No studies have been published within the urological literature about live operative demonstrations. Results from the present survey support concerns within the cardiothoracic and endoscopy literature about the continued use of live operative demonstrations. A formal review culminating in the development of an explicit policy statement by urologists should be undertaken.

AB - Objective: To survey a group of leading academic urologists from North America and abroad about their opinions regarding the educational value, safety, and ethics of live surgical demonstrations. Materials and Methods: An anonymous survey pertaining to live clinical demonstrations was sent to all active members of the American Association of Genitourinary Surgeons (AAGUS). Results: Ninety (50%) members completed the survey. Most respondents had performed at least one live surgical demonstration (93.2% at away institution, 81.5% at home institution). Overall anxiety level as a visiting professor was rated as moderate, high, and very high by 29.8%, 25.0%, and 17.9% of respondents, respectively. Anxiety while performing demonstrations at one's home institution was reported as moderate, high, and very high by 28.2%, 9.9%, and 8.5% of respondents, respectively. Excessive conversation in the operating room was cited as a major distraction by 41.3% of respondents. Concern over the appropriateness of selected cases was reported often (43.9%) and always (13.4%) of the time. Only 28.2% of AAGUS members would let a visiting faculty member operate on them or a family member. Most (70.9%) respondents felt live surgical demonstrations are morally ethical, but only 30.1% stated they should continue indefinitely in their present form. Conclusion: No studies have been published within the urological literature about live operative demonstrations. Results from the present survey support concerns within the cardiothoracic and endoscopy literature about the continued use of live operative demonstrations. A formal review culminating in the development of an explicit policy statement by urologists should be undertaken.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862829649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862829649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2011.12.037

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2011.12.037

M3 - Article

C2 - 22365455

AN - SCOPUS:84862829649

VL - 79

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 5

ER -