Litigation in obstetrics: Does defensive medicine contribute to increases in cesarean delivery?

Yvonne W. Cheng, Jonathan Snowden, Stephanie J. Handler, Ira B. Tager, Alan E. Hubbard, Aaron Caughey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Obstetrics is one of the most sued subspecialties in the US. This study aimed to examine clinicians' medical-legal experience and its association with recommending cesarean delivery. Design: Cross-sectional convenience survey. Population or sample: This is a survey study of clinicians in the US. Methods: Survey included eight common obstetric clinical vignettes and 27 questions regarding clinicians' practice environment. Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression models were used for statistical comparisons. Main outcome measures: Likelihood of recommending cesarean delivery. Results: There were 1486 clinicians who completed the survey. Clinicians were categorized based on answers to clinical vignettes. Having had lawsuits and daily worry of suits were associated with higher likelihood of recommending cesarean, compared to those without lawsuits (17.2 versus 11.3%, respectively; p=0.008) as was frequent worry of lawsuits (every day, 20.3% more likely; every week/month, 12.3%; few times a year/never, 11.4%, p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1668-1675
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume27
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014

Fingerprint

Defensive Medicine
Jurisprudence
Obstetrics
Logistic Models
Chi-Square Distribution
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Cesarean
  • Clinician characteristics
  • Litigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Litigation in obstetrics : Does defensive medicine contribute to increases in cesarean delivery? / Cheng, Yvonne W.; Snowden, Jonathan; Handler, Stephanie J.; Tager, Ira B.; Hubbard, Alan E.; Caughey, Aaron.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 16, 01.11.2014, p. 1668-1675.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cheng, Yvonne W. ; Snowden, Jonathan ; Handler, Stephanie J. ; Tager, Ira B. ; Hubbard, Alan E. ; Caughey, Aaron. / Litigation in obstetrics : Does defensive medicine contribute to increases in cesarean delivery?. In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 27, No. 16. pp. 1668-1675.
@article{73986eb6b3854e6782bd610833fad844,
title = "Litigation in obstetrics: Does defensive medicine contribute to increases in cesarean delivery?",
abstract = "Objective: Obstetrics is one of the most sued subspecialties in the US. This study aimed to examine clinicians' medical-legal experience and its association with recommending cesarean delivery. Design: Cross-sectional convenience survey. Population or sample: This is a survey study of clinicians in the US. Methods: Survey included eight common obstetric clinical vignettes and 27 questions regarding clinicians' practice environment. Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression models were used for statistical comparisons. Main outcome measures: Likelihood of recommending cesarean delivery. Results: There were 1486 clinicians who completed the survey. Clinicians were categorized based on answers to clinical vignettes. Having had lawsuits and daily worry of suits were associated with higher likelihood of recommending cesarean, compared to those without lawsuits (17.2 versus 11.3{\%}, respectively; p=0.008) as was frequent worry of lawsuits (every day, 20.3{\%} more likely; every week/month, 12.3{\%}; few times a year/never, 11.4{\%}, p",
keywords = "Cesarean, Clinician characteristics, Litigation",
author = "Cheng, {Yvonne W.} and Jonathan Snowden and Handler, {Stephanie J.} and Tager, {Ira B.} and Hubbard, {Alan E.} and Aaron Caughey",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/14767058.2013.879115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1668--1675",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Litigation in obstetrics

T2 - Does defensive medicine contribute to increases in cesarean delivery?

AU - Cheng, Yvonne W.

AU - Snowden, Jonathan

AU - Handler, Stephanie J.

AU - Tager, Ira B.

AU - Hubbard, Alan E.

AU - Caughey, Aaron

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Objective: Obstetrics is one of the most sued subspecialties in the US. This study aimed to examine clinicians' medical-legal experience and its association with recommending cesarean delivery. Design: Cross-sectional convenience survey. Population or sample: This is a survey study of clinicians in the US. Methods: Survey included eight common obstetric clinical vignettes and 27 questions regarding clinicians' practice environment. Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression models were used for statistical comparisons. Main outcome measures: Likelihood of recommending cesarean delivery. Results: There were 1486 clinicians who completed the survey. Clinicians were categorized based on answers to clinical vignettes. Having had lawsuits and daily worry of suits were associated with higher likelihood of recommending cesarean, compared to those without lawsuits (17.2 versus 11.3%, respectively; p=0.008) as was frequent worry of lawsuits (every day, 20.3% more likely; every week/month, 12.3%; few times a year/never, 11.4%, p

AB - Objective: Obstetrics is one of the most sued subspecialties in the US. This study aimed to examine clinicians' medical-legal experience and its association with recommending cesarean delivery. Design: Cross-sectional convenience survey. Population or sample: This is a survey study of clinicians in the US. Methods: Survey included eight common obstetric clinical vignettes and 27 questions regarding clinicians' practice environment. Chi-square test, multivariable logistic regression models were used for statistical comparisons. Main outcome measures: Likelihood of recommending cesarean delivery. Results: There were 1486 clinicians who completed the survey. Clinicians were categorized based on answers to clinical vignettes. Having had lawsuits and daily worry of suits were associated with higher likelihood of recommending cesarean, compared to those without lawsuits (17.2 versus 11.3%, respectively; p=0.008) as was frequent worry of lawsuits (every day, 20.3% more likely; every week/month, 12.3%; few times a year/never, 11.4%, p

KW - Cesarean

KW - Clinician characteristics

KW - Litigation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907813651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907813651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/14767058.2013.879115

DO - 10.3109/14767058.2013.879115

M3 - Article

C2 - 24460458

AN - SCOPUS:84907813651

VL - 27

SP - 1668

EP - 1675

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

IS - 16

ER -