Learning to listen again: The role of compliance in auditory training for adults with hearing loss

Theresa Hnath Chisolm, Gabrielle Saunders, Melissa T. Frederick, Rachel A. McArdle, Sherri L. Smith, Richard H. Wilsond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the role of compliance in the outcomes of computer-based auditory training with the Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) program in Veterans using hearing aids. Method: The authors examined available LACE training data for 5 tasks (i.e., speech-in-babble, time compression, competing speaker, auditory memory, missing word) from 50 hearing-aid users who participated in a larger, randomized controlled trial designed to examine the efficacy of LACE training. The goals were to determine: (a) whether there were changes in performance over 20 training sessions on trained tasks (i.e., on-task outcomes); and (b) whether compliance, defined as completing all 20 sessions, vs. noncompliance, defined as completing less than 20 sessions, influenced performance on parallel untrained tasks (i.e., off-task outcomes). Results: The majority, 84% of participants, completed 20 sessions, with maximum outcome occurring with at least 10 sessions of training for some tasks and up to 20 sessions of training for others. Comparison of baseline to posttest performance revealed statistically significant improvements for 4 of 7 off-task outcome measures for the compliant group, with at least small (0.2 <d <0.3) Cohen's d effect sizes for 3 of the 4. There were no statistically significant improvements observed for the noncompliant group. Conclusion: The high level of compliance in the present study may be attributable to use of systematized verbal and written instructions with telephone follow-up. Compliance, as expected, appears important for optimizing the outcomes of auditory training. Methods to improve compliance in clinical populations need to be developed, and compliance data are important to report in future studies of auditory training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)339-342
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Audiology
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Hearing Loss
Compliance
Learning
Hearing Aids
Communication
Veterans
Telephone
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population

Keywords

  • Adults
  • Auditory training
  • Compliance
  • Hearing loss
  • LACE

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Learning to listen again : The role of compliance in auditory training for adults with hearing loss. / Chisolm, Theresa Hnath; Saunders, Gabrielle; Frederick, Melissa T.; McArdle, Rachel A.; Smith, Sherri L.; Wilsond, Richard H.

In: American Journal of Audiology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 12.2013, p. 339-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chisolm, Theresa Hnath ; Saunders, Gabrielle ; Frederick, Melissa T. ; McArdle, Rachel A. ; Smith, Sherri L. ; Wilsond, Richard H. / Learning to listen again : The role of compliance in auditory training for adults with hearing loss. In: American Journal of Audiology. 2013 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 339-342.
@article{549947ccfe7f463c8b9a6d361df98c5a,
title = "Learning to listen again: The role of compliance in auditory training for adults with hearing loss",
abstract = "Purpose: To examine the role of compliance in the outcomes of computer-based auditory training with the Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) program in Veterans using hearing aids. Method: The authors examined available LACE training data for 5 tasks (i.e., speech-in-babble, time compression, competing speaker, auditory memory, missing word) from 50 hearing-aid users who participated in a larger, randomized controlled trial designed to examine the efficacy of LACE training. The goals were to determine: (a) whether there were changes in performance over 20 training sessions on trained tasks (i.e., on-task outcomes); and (b) whether compliance, defined as completing all 20 sessions, vs. noncompliance, defined as completing less than 20 sessions, influenced performance on parallel untrained tasks (i.e., off-task outcomes). Results: The majority, 84{\%} of participants, completed 20 sessions, with maximum outcome occurring with at least 10 sessions of training for some tasks and up to 20 sessions of training for others. Comparison of baseline to posttest performance revealed statistically significant improvements for 4 of 7 off-task outcome measures for the compliant group, with at least small (0.2",
keywords = "Adults, Auditory training, Compliance, Hearing loss, LACE",
author = "Chisolm, {Theresa Hnath} and Gabrielle Saunders and Frederick, {Melissa T.} and McArdle, {Rachel A.} and Smith, {Sherri L.} and Wilsond, {Richard H.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0081)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "339--342",
journal = "American Journal of Audiology",
issn = "1059-0889",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning to listen again

T2 - The role of compliance in auditory training for adults with hearing loss

AU - Chisolm, Theresa Hnath

AU - Saunders, Gabrielle

AU - Frederick, Melissa T.

AU - McArdle, Rachel A.

AU - Smith, Sherri L.

AU - Wilsond, Richard H.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Purpose: To examine the role of compliance in the outcomes of computer-based auditory training with the Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) program in Veterans using hearing aids. Method: The authors examined available LACE training data for 5 tasks (i.e., speech-in-babble, time compression, competing speaker, auditory memory, missing word) from 50 hearing-aid users who participated in a larger, randomized controlled trial designed to examine the efficacy of LACE training. The goals were to determine: (a) whether there were changes in performance over 20 training sessions on trained tasks (i.e., on-task outcomes); and (b) whether compliance, defined as completing all 20 sessions, vs. noncompliance, defined as completing less than 20 sessions, influenced performance on parallel untrained tasks (i.e., off-task outcomes). Results: The majority, 84% of participants, completed 20 sessions, with maximum outcome occurring with at least 10 sessions of training for some tasks and up to 20 sessions of training for others. Comparison of baseline to posttest performance revealed statistically significant improvements for 4 of 7 off-task outcome measures for the compliant group, with at least small (0.2

AB - Purpose: To examine the role of compliance in the outcomes of computer-based auditory training with the Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) program in Veterans using hearing aids. Method: The authors examined available LACE training data for 5 tasks (i.e., speech-in-babble, time compression, competing speaker, auditory memory, missing word) from 50 hearing-aid users who participated in a larger, randomized controlled trial designed to examine the efficacy of LACE training. The goals were to determine: (a) whether there were changes in performance over 20 training sessions on trained tasks (i.e., on-task outcomes); and (b) whether compliance, defined as completing all 20 sessions, vs. noncompliance, defined as completing less than 20 sessions, influenced performance on parallel untrained tasks (i.e., off-task outcomes). Results: The majority, 84% of participants, completed 20 sessions, with maximum outcome occurring with at least 10 sessions of training for some tasks and up to 20 sessions of training for others. Comparison of baseline to posttest performance revealed statistically significant improvements for 4 of 7 off-task outcome measures for the compliant group, with at least small (0.2

KW - Adults

KW - Auditory training

KW - Compliance

KW - Hearing loss

KW - LACE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891129280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891129280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0081)

DO - 10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0081)

M3 - Article

C2 - 24018575

AN - SCOPUS:84891129280

VL - 22

SP - 339

EP - 342

JO - American Journal of Audiology

JF - American Journal of Audiology

SN - 1059-0889

IS - 2

ER -