Is measured hearing aid benefit affected by seeing baseline outcome questionnaire responses?

Shienpei Silverman, Megan Cates, Gabrielle Saunders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether hearing aid outcome measured by the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI) for the Elderly/Adults (Newman, Weinstein, Jacobson, & Hug, 1990; Ventry & Weinstein, 1982) is differentially affected by informed vs. blind administration of the postfitting questionnaire. Method: Participants completed the HHI at their hearing aid evaluation and again at their hearing aid follow-up visit. At follow-up, half received a clean HHI form (blind administration), whereas the remainder responded on their original form (informed administration) and could thus base their follow-up responses on those they gave at the hearing aid evaluation. Results: The data show that for the population examined here, informed administration of the follow-up HHI did not yield a different outcome to blind administration of the follow-up HHI. This was not influenced by past hearing aid use, age of the participant, or the duration of time between baseline questionnaire completion and follow-up completion. Conclusion: These data suggest that completion of follow-up questionnaires in either informed or blind format will have little impact on HHI responses, most likely because of the many other factors that combined to influence hearing aid outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)90-99
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Audiology
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

Hearing Aids
Hearing
Equipment and Supplies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Population

Keywords

  • Audiologic rehabilitation
  • Hearing aids
  • Outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Is measured hearing aid benefit affected by seeing baseline outcome questionnaire responses? / Silverman, Shienpei; Cates, Megan; Saunders, Gabrielle.

In: American Journal of Audiology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.12.2011, p. 90-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e4956440293427ab945bf38a1419903,
title = "Is measured hearing aid benefit affected by seeing baseline outcome questionnaire responses?",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine whether hearing aid outcome measured by the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI) for the Elderly/Adults (Newman, Weinstein, Jacobson, & Hug, 1990; Ventry & Weinstein, 1982) is differentially affected by informed vs. blind administration of the postfitting questionnaire. Method: Participants completed the HHI at their hearing aid evaluation and again at their hearing aid follow-up visit. At follow-up, half received a clean HHI form (blind administration), whereas the remainder responded on their original form (informed administration) and could thus base their follow-up responses on those they gave at the hearing aid evaluation. Results: The data show that for the population examined here, informed administration of the follow-up HHI did not yield a different outcome to blind administration of the follow-up HHI. This was not influenced by past hearing aid use, age of the participant, or the duration of time between baseline questionnaire completion and follow-up completion. Conclusion: These data suggest that completion of follow-up questionnaires in either informed or blind format will have little impact on HHI responses, most likely because of the many other factors that combined to influence hearing aid outcome.",
keywords = "Audiologic rehabilitation, Hearing aids, Outcomes",
author = "Shienpei Silverman and Megan Cates and Gabrielle Saunders",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0003)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "90--99",
journal = "American Journal of Audiology",
issn = "1059-0889",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is measured hearing aid benefit affected by seeing baseline outcome questionnaire responses?

AU - Silverman, Shienpei

AU - Cates, Megan

AU - Saunders, Gabrielle

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Purpose: To determine whether hearing aid outcome measured by the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI) for the Elderly/Adults (Newman, Weinstein, Jacobson, & Hug, 1990; Ventry & Weinstein, 1982) is differentially affected by informed vs. blind administration of the postfitting questionnaire. Method: Participants completed the HHI at their hearing aid evaluation and again at their hearing aid follow-up visit. At follow-up, half received a clean HHI form (blind administration), whereas the remainder responded on their original form (informed administration) and could thus base their follow-up responses on those they gave at the hearing aid evaluation. Results: The data show that for the population examined here, informed administration of the follow-up HHI did not yield a different outcome to blind administration of the follow-up HHI. This was not influenced by past hearing aid use, age of the participant, or the duration of time between baseline questionnaire completion and follow-up completion. Conclusion: These data suggest that completion of follow-up questionnaires in either informed or blind format will have little impact on HHI responses, most likely because of the many other factors that combined to influence hearing aid outcome.

AB - Purpose: To determine whether hearing aid outcome measured by the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI) for the Elderly/Adults (Newman, Weinstein, Jacobson, & Hug, 1990; Ventry & Weinstein, 1982) is differentially affected by informed vs. blind administration of the postfitting questionnaire. Method: Participants completed the HHI at their hearing aid evaluation and again at their hearing aid follow-up visit. At follow-up, half received a clean HHI form (blind administration), whereas the remainder responded on their original form (informed administration) and could thus base their follow-up responses on those they gave at the hearing aid evaluation. Results: The data show that for the population examined here, informed administration of the follow-up HHI did not yield a different outcome to blind administration of the follow-up HHI. This was not influenced by past hearing aid use, age of the participant, or the duration of time between baseline questionnaire completion and follow-up completion. Conclusion: These data suggest that completion of follow-up questionnaires in either informed or blind format will have little impact on HHI responses, most likely because of the many other factors that combined to influence hearing aid outcome.

KW - Audiologic rehabilitation

KW - Hearing aids

KW - Outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83055160795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83055160795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0003)

DO - 10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0003)

M3 - Article

C2 - 21940983

AN - SCOPUS:83055160795

VL - 20

SP - 90

EP - 99

JO - American Journal of Audiology

JF - American Journal of Audiology

SN - 1059-0889

IS - 2

ER -