Interexpert agreement of plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity

Michael F. Chiang, Lei Jiang, Rony Gelman, Yunling E. Du, John T. Flynn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

169 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To measure agreement of plus disease diagnosis among retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) experts. Methods: A set of 34 wide-angle retinal photographs from infants with ROP was compiled on a secure Web site and was interpreted independently by 22 recognized ROP experts. Diagnostic agreement was analyzed using 3-level (plus, pre-plus, or neither) and 2-level (plus or not plus) categorizations. Results: In the 3-level categorization, all experts agreed on the same diagnosis in 4 of 34 images (12%), and the mean weighted κ statistic for each expert compared with all others was between 0.21 and 0.40 (fair agreement) for 7 experts (32%) and between 0.41 and 0.60 (moderate agreement) for 15 experts (68%). In the 2-level categorization, all experts who provided a diagnosis agreed in 7 of 34 images (21%), and the mean κ statistic for each expert compared with all others was between 0 and 0.20 (slight agreement) for 1 expert (5%), between 0.21 and 0.40 (fair agreement) for 3 experts (14%), between 0.41 and 0.60 (moderate agreement) for 12 experts (55%), and between 0.61 and 0.80 (substantial agreement) for 6 experts (27%). Conclusions: Interexpert agreement of plus disease diagnosis is imperfect. This may have important implications for clinical ROP management, continued refinement of the international ROP classification system, development of computer-based diagnostic algorithms, and implementation of ROP telemedicine systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)875-880
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of ophthalmology
Volume125
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interexpert agreement of plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this