Improving endoscopy completion: Effectiveness of an interactive voice response system

Joan M. Griffin, Erin M. Hulbert, Sally W. Vernon, David Nelson, Emily M. Hagel, Sean Nugent, Alisha Baines Simon, Ann Bangerter, Michelle van Ryn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To test whether an interactive voice response (IVR) system phone call was equally effective as a nurse-delivered phone call at educating and preparing patients for flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and colonoscopy examinations. Study Design: Three-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: The trial included patients with upcoming FS or colonoscopy appointments to test the equivalence of an IVR system to nurse-delivered phone calls in reducing appointment nonattendance and inadequate preparation for an examination. Message timing and satisfaction with the intervention were assessed. The 3 study conditions included the following: nurse phone call 7 days before the procedure, IVR system call 7 days before the procedure, and IVR system call 3 days before the procedure. All calls included an appointment reminder, information about preparation for the examination, and encouragement to prepare for and attend the examination. Results: A total of 3610 patients were eligible for the study; of these, 1229 (34%) were scheduled for FS and 2381 (66%) for colonoscopy. There were no statistically significant differences across the 3 study arms in appointment attendance or adherence to preparation instructions. Significantly more patients in IVR conditions reported neutral perceptions about the phone calls, and more patients receiving nurse calls reported very positive perceptions about the phone calls. Conclusion: An IVR system call is as effective as a nurse phone call for ensuring that patients attend appointments and are adequately prepared for endoscopy examinations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-208
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Managed Care
Volume17
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endoscopy
Appointments and Schedules
Sigmoidoscopy
Nurses
Colonoscopy
Randomized Controlled Trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Griffin, J. M., Hulbert, E. M., Vernon, S. W., Nelson, D., Hagel, E. M., Nugent, S., ... van Ryn, M. (2011). Improving endoscopy completion: Effectiveness of an interactive voice response system. American Journal of Managed Care, 17(3), 199-208.

Improving endoscopy completion : Effectiveness of an interactive voice response system. / Griffin, Joan M.; Hulbert, Erin M.; Vernon, Sally W.; Nelson, David; Hagel, Emily M.; Nugent, Sean; Simon, Alisha Baines; Bangerter, Ann; van Ryn, Michelle.

In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.03.2011, p. 199-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Griffin, JM, Hulbert, EM, Vernon, SW, Nelson, D, Hagel, EM, Nugent, S, Simon, AB, Bangerter, A & van Ryn, M 2011, 'Improving endoscopy completion: Effectiveness of an interactive voice response system', American Journal of Managed Care, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 199-208.
Griffin JM, Hulbert EM, Vernon SW, Nelson D, Hagel EM, Nugent S et al. Improving endoscopy completion: Effectiveness of an interactive voice response system. American Journal of Managed Care. 2011 Mar 1;17(3):199-208.
Griffin, Joan M. ; Hulbert, Erin M. ; Vernon, Sally W. ; Nelson, David ; Hagel, Emily M. ; Nugent, Sean ; Simon, Alisha Baines ; Bangerter, Ann ; van Ryn, Michelle. / Improving endoscopy completion : Effectiveness of an interactive voice response system. In: American Journal of Managed Care. 2011 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 199-208.
@article{5fe78d4220e44f359451a6c06eaf2cd3,
title = "Improving endoscopy completion: Effectiveness of an interactive voice response system",
abstract = "Objective: To test whether an interactive voice response (IVR) system phone call was equally effective as a nurse-delivered phone call at educating and preparing patients for flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and colonoscopy examinations. Study Design: Three-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: The trial included patients with upcoming FS or colonoscopy appointments to test the equivalence of an IVR system to nurse-delivered phone calls in reducing appointment nonattendance and inadequate preparation for an examination. Message timing and satisfaction with the intervention were assessed. The 3 study conditions included the following: nurse phone call 7 days before the procedure, IVR system call 7 days before the procedure, and IVR system call 3 days before the procedure. All calls included an appointment reminder, information about preparation for the examination, and encouragement to prepare for and attend the examination. Results: A total of 3610 patients were eligible for the study; of these, 1229 (34{\%}) were scheduled for FS and 2381 (66{\%}) for colonoscopy. There were no statistically significant differences across the 3 study arms in appointment attendance or adherence to preparation instructions. Significantly more patients in IVR conditions reported neutral perceptions about the phone calls, and more patients receiving nurse calls reported very positive perceptions about the phone calls. Conclusion: An IVR system call is as effective as a nurse phone call for ensuring that patients attend appointments and are adequately prepared for endoscopy examinations.",
author = "Griffin, {Joan M.} and Hulbert, {Erin M.} and Vernon, {Sally W.} and David Nelson and Hagel, {Emily M.} and Sean Nugent and Simon, {Alisha Baines} and Ann Bangerter and {van Ryn}, Michelle",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "199--208",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving endoscopy completion

T2 - Effectiveness of an interactive voice response system

AU - Griffin, Joan M.

AU - Hulbert, Erin M.

AU - Vernon, Sally W.

AU - Nelson, David

AU - Hagel, Emily M.

AU - Nugent, Sean

AU - Simon, Alisha Baines

AU - Bangerter, Ann

AU - van Ryn, Michelle

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - Objective: To test whether an interactive voice response (IVR) system phone call was equally effective as a nurse-delivered phone call at educating and preparing patients for flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and colonoscopy examinations. Study Design: Three-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: The trial included patients with upcoming FS or colonoscopy appointments to test the equivalence of an IVR system to nurse-delivered phone calls in reducing appointment nonattendance and inadequate preparation for an examination. Message timing and satisfaction with the intervention were assessed. The 3 study conditions included the following: nurse phone call 7 days before the procedure, IVR system call 7 days before the procedure, and IVR system call 3 days before the procedure. All calls included an appointment reminder, information about preparation for the examination, and encouragement to prepare for and attend the examination. Results: A total of 3610 patients were eligible for the study; of these, 1229 (34%) were scheduled for FS and 2381 (66%) for colonoscopy. There were no statistically significant differences across the 3 study arms in appointment attendance or adherence to preparation instructions. Significantly more patients in IVR conditions reported neutral perceptions about the phone calls, and more patients receiving nurse calls reported very positive perceptions about the phone calls. Conclusion: An IVR system call is as effective as a nurse phone call for ensuring that patients attend appointments and are adequately prepared for endoscopy examinations.

AB - Objective: To test whether an interactive voice response (IVR) system phone call was equally effective as a nurse-delivered phone call at educating and preparing patients for flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and colonoscopy examinations. Study Design: Three-arm randomized controlled trial. Methods: The trial included patients with upcoming FS or colonoscopy appointments to test the equivalence of an IVR system to nurse-delivered phone calls in reducing appointment nonattendance and inadequate preparation for an examination. Message timing and satisfaction with the intervention were assessed. The 3 study conditions included the following: nurse phone call 7 days before the procedure, IVR system call 7 days before the procedure, and IVR system call 3 days before the procedure. All calls included an appointment reminder, information about preparation for the examination, and encouragement to prepare for and attend the examination. Results: A total of 3610 patients were eligible for the study; of these, 1229 (34%) were scheduled for FS and 2381 (66%) for colonoscopy. There were no statistically significant differences across the 3 study arms in appointment attendance or adherence to preparation instructions. Significantly more patients in IVR conditions reported neutral perceptions about the phone calls, and more patients receiving nurse calls reported very positive perceptions about the phone calls. Conclusion: An IVR system call is as effective as a nurse phone call for ensuring that patients attend appointments and are adequately prepared for endoscopy examinations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960220941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960220941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21504256

AN - SCOPUS:79960220941

VL - 17

SP - 199

EP - 208

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 3

ER -