TY - JOUR
T1 - Implant inclination and horizontal misfit in metallic bar framework of overdentures
T2 - Analysis by 3D-FEA method
AU - Caldas, Ricardo Armini
AU - Pfeifer, Carmem Silvia Costa
AU - Bacchi, Ataís
AU - dos Santos, Mateus Bertolini Fernandes
AU - Reginato, Vagner Flávio
AU - Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Associacao Brasileira de Divulgacao Cientifica. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - The aim of this study was to evaluate by three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA) the biomechanics involved in bar-framework system for overdentures. The studied factors were latero-lateral angulation in the right implant (-10,-5, 0, 5 and 10 degrees), and different bar cross-sections (circular, Hader and oval) presenting horizontal misfits (50 or 150 µm) on the opposite implant. Positive angulation (5 and 10 degrees) for implant inclination to mesial position, negative angulation (-5 and-10 degrees) for distal position, and zero degree for parallel implants. The von Mises stresses evaluated the bar, screw and the implant; maximum principal, minimum principal and shear stress analyses evaluated the peri-implant bone tissue. Parallel implants provide lower stress in alveolar bone tissue; mesial inclined bars showed the most negative effect on prosthetic structures and implants. In conclusion, bar cross-section showed no influence on stress distribution for peri-implant bone tissue, and circular bar provided better behavior to the prosthetic system. Higher stress concentration is provided to all system as the misfit increases.
AB - The aim of this study was to evaluate by three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA) the biomechanics involved in bar-framework system for overdentures. The studied factors were latero-lateral angulation in the right implant (-10,-5, 0, 5 and 10 degrees), and different bar cross-sections (circular, Hader and oval) presenting horizontal misfits (50 or 150 µm) on the opposite implant. Positive angulation (5 and 10 degrees) for implant inclination to mesial position, negative angulation (-5 and-10 degrees) for distal position, and zero degree for parallel implants. The von Mises stresses evaluated the bar, screw and the implant; maximum principal, minimum principal and shear stress analyses evaluated the peri-implant bone tissue. Parallel implants provide lower stress in alveolar bone tissue; mesial inclined bars showed the most negative effect on prosthetic structures and implants. In conclusion, bar cross-section showed no influence on stress distribution for peri-implant bone tissue, and circular bar provided better behavior to the prosthetic system. Higher stress concentration is provided to all system as the misfit increases.
KW - Dental implants
KW - Finite element analysis
KW - Misfit
KW - Overdentures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048559115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048559115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1590/0103-6440201801672
DO - 10.1590/0103-6440201801672
M3 - Article
C2 - 29898063
AN - SCOPUS:85048559115
SN - 0103-6440
VL - 29
SP - 166
EP - 172
JO - Brazilian Dental Journal
JF - Brazilian Dental Journal
IS - 2
ER -