Impact of Alternative Payment Methodology on Primary Care Visits and Scheduling

John Heintzman, Erika Cottrell, Heather Angier, Jean O'Malley, Steffani Bailey, Lorie Jacob, Jennifer Devoe, Maria Ukhanova, Erin Thayer, Miguel Marino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2013, Oregon initiated an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM) Experiment for select health centers, initiating capitated payments for patients with Medicaid. OBJECTIVE: To use electronic health record data to evaluate the impact of APM on visit and scheduling metrics in the first wave of experiment clinics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective clinic cohort. Difference-in-differences analysis using generalized linear mixed modeling across 2 time thresholds: the initiation of APM and the start of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion. SUBJECTS: Eight primary clinics enrolled in APM on March 1, 2013 and 10 comparison clinics not enrolled in APM during the study period (July 1, 2012 to February 28, 2015). MEASURES: Independent variable: intervention status of the clinics (APM or comparison). Dependent variables: total patient encounters, total alternative encounters, new patient visits, provider appointment availability, number of appointment overbooks and no-shows/late cancellations. RESULTS: Comparison clinics had smaller patient panels and more advanced practice providers than APM clinics, but both had similar proportions of Hispanic, Medicaid, and uninsured patients. APM clinics had a 20% greater increase in same-day openings than non-APM clinics across the APM implementation (Relative Ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.42). Otherwise, there were minimal differences in APM clinics and control clinics in wait times, visit rates, patient no-shows, and overbooks. CONCLUSIONS: APM clinics experienced a greater increase in same-day visits over the course of this experiment, but did not significantly differ from comparators in other visit metrics. Further research into other impacts of this experiment are necessary and ongoing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)539-549
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Medicaid
Appointments and Schedules
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Electronic Health Records
Hispanic Americans
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Appointments and Schedules
  • Health Care Systems
  • Health Insurance
  • Health Policy
  • Health Services
  • Medicaid
  • Medically Uninsured
  • No-Show Patients
  • Oregon
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • Primary Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Impact of Alternative Payment Methodology on Primary Care Visits and Scheduling. / Heintzman, John; Cottrell, Erika; Angier, Heather; O'Malley, Jean; Bailey, Steffani; Jacob, Lorie; Devoe, Jennifer; Ukhanova, Maria; Thayer, Erin; Marino, Miguel.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, Vol. 32, No. 4, 01.07.2019, p. 539-549.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85ca7d5e75ee4c179f319ca3be08520f,
title = "Impact of Alternative Payment Methodology on Primary Care Visits and Scheduling",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In 2013, Oregon initiated an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM) Experiment for select health centers, initiating capitated payments for patients with Medicaid. OBJECTIVE: To use electronic health record data to evaluate the impact of APM on visit and scheduling metrics in the first wave of experiment clinics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective clinic cohort. Difference-in-differences analysis using generalized linear mixed modeling across 2 time thresholds: the initiation of APM and the start of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion. SUBJECTS: Eight primary clinics enrolled in APM on March 1, 2013 and 10 comparison clinics not enrolled in APM during the study period (July 1, 2012 to February 28, 2015). MEASURES: Independent variable: intervention status of the clinics (APM or comparison). Dependent variables: total patient encounters, total alternative encounters, new patient visits, provider appointment availability, number of appointment overbooks and no-shows/late cancellations. RESULTS: Comparison clinics had smaller patient panels and more advanced practice providers than APM clinics, but both had similar proportions of Hispanic, Medicaid, and uninsured patients. APM clinics had a 20{\%} greater increase in same-day openings than non-APM clinics across the APM implementation (Relative Ratio, 1.20; 95{\%} CI, 1.02 to 1.42). Otherwise, there were minimal differences in APM clinics and control clinics in wait times, visit rates, patient no-shows, and overbooks. CONCLUSIONS: APM clinics experienced a greater increase in same-day visits over the course of this experiment, but did not significantly differ from comparators in other visit metrics. Further research into other impacts of this experiment are necessary and ongoing.",
keywords = "Appointments and Schedules, Health Care Systems, Health Insurance, Health Policy, Health Services, Medicaid, Medically Uninsured, No-Show Patients, Oregon, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Primary Health Care",
author = "John Heintzman and Erika Cottrell and Heather Angier and Jean O'Malley and Steffani Bailey and Lorie Jacob and Jennifer Devoe and Maria Ukhanova and Erin Thayer and Miguel Marino",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180368",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "539--549",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Alternative Payment Methodology on Primary Care Visits and Scheduling

AU - Heintzman, John

AU - Cottrell, Erika

AU - Angier, Heather

AU - O'Malley, Jean

AU - Bailey, Steffani

AU - Jacob, Lorie

AU - Devoe, Jennifer

AU - Ukhanova, Maria

AU - Thayer, Erin

AU - Marino, Miguel

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: In 2013, Oregon initiated an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM) Experiment for select health centers, initiating capitated payments for patients with Medicaid. OBJECTIVE: To use electronic health record data to evaluate the impact of APM on visit and scheduling metrics in the first wave of experiment clinics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective clinic cohort. Difference-in-differences analysis using generalized linear mixed modeling across 2 time thresholds: the initiation of APM and the start of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion. SUBJECTS: Eight primary clinics enrolled in APM on March 1, 2013 and 10 comparison clinics not enrolled in APM during the study period (July 1, 2012 to February 28, 2015). MEASURES: Independent variable: intervention status of the clinics (APM or comparison). Dependent variables: total patient encounters, total alternative encounters, new patient visits, provider appointment availability, number of appointment overbooks and no-shows/late cancellations. RESULTS: Comparison clinics had smaller patient panels and more advanced practice providers than APM clinics, but both had similar proportions of Hispanic, Medicaid, and uninsured patients. APM clinics had a 20% greater increase in same-day openings than non-APM clinics across the APM implementation (Relative Ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.42). Otherwise, there were minimal differences in APM clinics and control clinics in wait times, visit rates, patient no-shows, and overbooks. CONCLUSIONS: APM clinics experienced a greater increase in same-day visits over the course of this experiment, but did not significantly differ from comparators in other visit metrics. Further research into other impacts of this experiment are necessary and ongoing.

AB - BACKGROUND: In 2013, Oregon initiated an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM) Experiment for select health centers, initiating capitated payments for patients with Medicaid. OBJECTIVE: To use electronic health record data to evaluate the impact of APM on visit and scheduling metrics in the first wave of experiment clinics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective clinic cohort. Difference-in-differences analysis using generalized linear mixed modeling across 2 time thresholds: the initiation of APM and the start of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion. SUBJECTS: Eight primary clinics enrolled in APM on March 1, 2013 and 10 comparison clinics not enrolled in APM during the study period (July 1, 2012 to February 28, 2015). MEASURES: Independent variable: intervention status of the clinics (APM or comparison). Dependent variables: total patient encounters, total alternative encounters, new patient visits, provider appointment availability, number of appointment overbooks and no-shows/late cancellations. RESULTS: Comparison clinics had smaller patient panels and more advanced practice providers than APM clinics, but both had similar proportions of Hispanic, Medicaid, and uninsured patients. APM clinics had a 20% greater increase in same-day openings than non-APM clinics across the APM implementation (Relative Ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.42). Otherwise, there were minimal differences in APM clinics and control clinics in wait times, visit rates, patient no-shows, and overbooks. CONCLUSIONS: APM clinics experienced a greater increase in same-day visits over the course of this experiment, but did not significantly differ from comparators in other visit metrics. Further research into other impacts of this experiment are necessary and ongoing.

KW - Appointments and Schedules

KW - Health Care Systems

KW - Health Insurance

KW - Health Policy

KW - Health Services

KW - Medicaid

KW - Medically Uninsured

KW - No-Show Patients

KW - Oregon

KW - Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

KW - Primary Health Care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069884903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069884903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180368

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180368

M3 - Article

C2 - 31300574

AN - SCOPUS:85069884903

VL - 32

SP - 539

EP - 549

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 4

ER -