Imaging techniques for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Roger Chou, Carlos Cuevas, Rongwei Fu, Beth Devine, Ngoc Wasson, Alexander Ginsburg, Bernadette Zakher, Miranda Pappas, Elaine Graham, Sean D. Sullivan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Several imaging modalities are available for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Purpose: To evaluate the test performance of imaging modalities for HCC. Data Sources: MEDLINE (1998 to December 2014), the Cochrane Library Database, Scopus, and reference lists. Study Selection: Studies on test performance of ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Data Extraction: One investigator abstracted data, and a second investigator confirmed them; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality and strength of evidence. Data Synthesis: Few studies have evaluated imaging for HCC in surveillance settings. In nonsurveillance settings, sensitivity for detection of HCC lesions was lower for ultrasonography without contrast than for CT or MRI (pooled difference based on direct comparisons, 0.11 to 0.22), and MRI was associated with higher sensitivity than CT (pooled difference, 0.09 [95% CI, 0.07 to 12]). For evaluation of focal liver lesions, there were no clear differences in sensitivity among ultrasonography with contrast, CT, and MRI. Specificity was generally 0.85 or higher across imaging modalities, but this item was not reported in many studies. Factors associated with lower sensitivity included use of an explanted liver reference standard, and smaller or more welldifferentiated HCC lesions. For MRI, sensitivity was slightly higher for hepatic-specific than nonspecific contrast agents. Limitations: Only English-language articles were included, there was statistical heterogeneity in pooled analyses, and costs were not assessed. Most studies were conducted in Asia and had methodological limitations. Conclusion: CT and MRI are associated with higher sensitivity than ultrasonography without contrast for detection of HCC; sensitivity was higher for MRI than CT. For evaluation of focal liver lesions, the sensitivities of ultrasonography with contrast, CT, and MRI for HCC are similar. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42014007016).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)697-711
Number of pages15
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume162
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Imaging techniques for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Chou, R., Cuevas, C., Fu, R., Devine, B., Wasson, N., Ginsburg, A., Zakher, B., Pappas, M., Graham, E., & Sullivan, S. D. (2015). Imaging techniques for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of internal medicine, 162(10), 697-711. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2509