Identifying mechanisms of stance control

A single stimulus multiple output model-fit approach

Adam D. Goodworth, Robert (Bob) Peterka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Posture control models are instrumental to interpret experimental data and test hypotheses. However, as models have increased in complexity to include multi-segmental dynamics, discrepancy has arisen amongst researchers regarding the accuracy and limitations of identifying neural control parameters using a single stimulus. New method The current study examines this topic using simulations with a parameterized model-fit approach. We first determine if the model-fit approach can identify parameters in the theoretical situation with no noise. Then, we measure variability and bias of parameter estimates when realistic noise is included. We also address how the accuracy is influenced by the frequency bandwidth of the stimulus, signal-to-noise of the data, and fitting procedures. Results We found perfect identification of parameters in the theoretical model without noise. With realistic noise, bias errors were 4.4% and 7.6% for fits that included frequencies 0.02–1.2 Hz and 0.02–0.4 Hz, respectively. Fits between 0.02–1.2 Hz also had the lowest variability in parameter estimates compared to other bandwidths. Parameters with the lowest variability tended to have the largest influence on body sways. Results also demonstrated the importance of closely examining model fits because of limitations in fitting algorithms. Comparison with existing method The single-input model-fit approach may be a simpler and more practical method for identifying neural control mechanisms compared to a multi-stimulus alternative. Conclusions This study provides timely theoretical and practical considerations applicable to the design and analysis of experiments contributing to the identification of mechanisms underlying stance control of a multi-segment body.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-56
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volume296
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2018

Fingerprint

Noise
Posture
Theoretical Models
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Balance
  • Fitting
  • Modeling
  • Neural control
  • System identification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Identifying mechanisms of stance control : A single stimulus multiple output model-fit approach. / Goodworth, Adam D.; Peterka, Robert (Bob).

In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 296, 15.02.2018, p. 44-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{982678adc24a4c608a83bb4e1bbcbe71,
title = "Identifying mechanisms of stance control: A single stimulus multiple output model-fit approach",
abstract = "Background Posture control models are instrumental to interpret experimental data and test hypotheses. However, as models have increased in complexity to include multi-segmental dynamics, discrepancy has arisen amongst researchers regarding the accuracy and limitations of identifying neural control parameters using a single stimulus. New method The current study examines this topic using simulations with a parameterized model-fit approach. We first determine if the model-fit approach can identify parameters in the theoretical situation with no noise. Then, we measure variability and bias of parameter estimates when realistic noise is included. We also address how the accuracy is influenced by the frequency bandwidth of the stimulus, signal-to-noise of the data, and fitting procedures. Results We found perfect identification of parameters in the theoretical model without noise. With realistic noise, bias errors were 4.4{\%} and 7.6{\%} for fits that included frequencies 0.02–1.2 Hz and 0.02–0.4 Hz, respectively. Fits between 0.02–1.2 Hz also had the lowest variability in parameter estimates compared to other bandwidths. Parameters with the lowest variability tended to have the largest influence on body sways. Results also demonstrated the importance of closely examining model fits because of limitations in fitting algorithms. Comparison with existing method The single-input model-fit approach may be a simpler and more practical method for identifying neural control mechanisms compared to a multi-stimulus alternative. Conclusions This study provides timely theoretical and practical considerations applicable to the design and analysis of experiments contributing to the identification of mechanisms underlying stance control of a multi-segment body.",
keywords = "Balance, Fitting, Modeling, Neural control, System identification",
author = "Goodworth, {Adam D.} and Peterka, {Robert (Bob)}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "296",
pages = "44--56",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Methods",
issn = "0165-0270",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying mechanisms of stance control

T2 - A single stimulus multiple output model-fit approach

AU - Goodworth, Adam D.

AU - Peterka, Robert (Bob)

PY - 2018/2/15

Y1 - 2018/2/15

N2 - Background Posture control models are instrumental to interpret experimental data and test hypotheses. However, as models have increased in complexity to include multi-segmental dynamics, discrepancy has arisen amongst researchers regarding the accuracy and limitations of identifying neural control parameters using a single stimulus. New method The current study examines this topic using simulations with a parameterized model-fit approach. We first determine if the model-fit approach can identify parameters in the theoretical situation with no noise. Then, we measure variability and bias of parameter estimates when realistic noise is included. We also address how the accuracy is influenced by the frequency bandwidth of the stimulus, signal-to-noise of the data, and fitting procedures. Results We found perfect identification of parameters in the theoretical model without noise. With realistic noise, bias errors were 4.4% and 7.6% for fits that included frequencies 0.02–1.2 Hz and 0.02–0.4 Hz, respectively. Fits between 0.02–1.2 Hz also had the lowest variability in parameter estimates compared to other bandwidths. Parameters with the lowest variability tended to have the largest influence on body sways. Results also demonstrated the importance of closely examining model fits because of limitations in fitting algorithms. Comparison with existing method The single-input model-fit approach may be a simpler and more practical method for identifying neural control mechanisms compared to a multi-stimulus alternative. Conclusions This study provides timely theoretical and practical considerations applicable to the design and analysis of experiments contributing to the identification of mechanisms underlying stance control of a multi-segment body.

AB - Background Posture control models are instrumental to interpret experimental data and test hypotheses. However, as models have increased in complexity to include multi-segmental dynamics, discrepancy has arisen amongst researchers regarding the accuracy and limitations of identifying neural control parameters using a single stimulus. New method The current study examines this topic using simulations with a parameterized model-fit approach. We first determine if the model-fit approach can identify parameters in the theoretical situation with no noise. Then, we measure variability and bias of parameter estimates when realistic noise is included. We also address how the accuracy is influenced by the frequency bandwidth of the stimulus, signal-to-noise of the data, and fitting procedures. Results We found perfect identification of parameters in the theoretical model without noise. With realistic noise, bias errors were 4.4% and 7.6% for fits that included frequencies 0.02–1.2 Hz and 0.02–0.4 Hz, respectively. Fits between 0.02–1.2 Hz also had the lowest variability in parameter estimates compared to other bandwidths. Parameters with the lowest variability tended to have the largest influence on body sways. Results also demonstrated the importance of closely examining model fits because of limitations in fitting algorithms. Comparison with existing method The single-input model-fit approach may be a simpler and more practical method for identifying neural control mechanisms compared to a multi-stimulus alternative. Conclusions This study provides timely theoretical and practical considerations applicable to the design and analysis of experiments contributing to the identification of mechanisms underlying stance control of a multi-segment body.

KW - Balance

KW - Fitting

KW - Modeling

KW - Neural control

KW - System identification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039867583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039867583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.015

M3 - Article

VL - 296

SP - 44

EP - 56

JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

SN - 0165-0270

ER -