How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?-Ethics of calling codes

Primi Ashley Ranola, Raina M. Merchant, Sarah M. Perman, Abigail Khan, David Gaieski, Arthur L. Caplan, James N. Kirkpatrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

'Calling' a code can be an ambiguous undertaking. Despite guidelines and the medical literature outlining when it is acceptable to stop resuscitation, code cessation and deciding what not to do during a code, in practice, is an art form. Familiarity with classic evidence suggesting most codes are unsuccessful may influence decisions about when to terminate resuscitative efforts, in effect enacting self-fulfilling prophesies. Code interventions and duration may be influenced by patient demographics, gender or a concern about the stewardship of scarce resources. Yet, recent evidence links longer code duration with improved outcomes, and advances in resuscitation techniques complicate attempts to standardise both resuscitation length and the application of advanced interventions. In this context of increasing clinical and moral uncertainty, discussions between patients, families and medical providers about resuscitation plans take on an increased degree of importance. For some patients, a 'bespoke' resuscitation plan may be in order.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)663-666
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume41
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Codes of Ethics
Resuscitation
moral philosophy
evidence
uncertainty
art
gender
resources
Art
Uncertainty
Demography
Guidelines
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Ranola, P. A., Merchant, R. M., Perman, S. M., Khan, A., Gaieski, D., Caplan, A. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. N. (2015). How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?-Ethics of calling codes. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(8), 663-666. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101949

How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?-Ethics of calling codes. / Ranola, Primi Ashley; Merchant, Raina M.; Perman, Sarah M.; Khan, Abigail; Gaieski, David; Caplan, Arthur L.; Kirkpatrick, James N.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 41, No. 8, 2015, p. 663-666.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ranola, PA, Merchant, RM, Perman, SM, Khan, A, Gaieski, D, Caplan, AL & Kirkpatrick, JN 2015, 'How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?-Ethics of calling codes', Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 663-666. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101949
Ranola, Primi Ashley ; Merchant, Raina M. ; Perman, Sarah M. ; Khan, Abigail ; Gaieski, David ; Caplan, Arthur L. ; Kirkpatrick, James N. / How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?-Ethics of calling codes. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2015 ; Vol. 41, No. 8. pp. 663-666.
@article{55f079ba155a4c83a15d6b12b3336954,
title = "How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?-Ethics of calling codes",
abstract = "'Calling' a code can be an ambiguous undertaking. Despite guidelines and the medical literature outlining when it is acceptable to stop resuscitation, code cessation and deciding what not to do during a code, in practice, is an art form. Familiarity with classic evidence suggesting most codes are unsuccessful may influence decisions about when to terminate resuscitative efforts, in effect enacting self-fulfilling prophesies. Code interventions and duration may be influenced by patient demographics, gender or a concern about the stewardship of scarce resources. Yet, recent evidence links longer code duration with improved outcomes, and advances in resuscitation techniques complicate attempts to standardise both resuscitation length and the application of advanced interventions. In this context of increasing clinical and moral uncertainty, discussions between patients, families and medical providers about resuscitation plans take on an increased degree of importance. For some patients, a 'bespoke' resuscitation plan may be in order.",
author = "Ranola, {Primi Ashley} and Merchant, {Raina M.} and Perman, {Sarah M.} and Abigail Khan and David Gaieski and Caplan, {Arthur L.} and Kirkpatrick, {James N.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2013-101949",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "663--666",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?-Ethics of calling codes

AU - Ranola, Primi Ashley

AU - Merchant, Raina M.

AU - Perman, Sarah M.

AU - Khan, Abigail

AU - Gaieski, David

AU - Caplan, Arthur L.

AU - Kirkpatrick, James N.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - 'Calling' a code can be an ambiguous undertaking. Despite guidelines and the medical literature outlining when it is acceptable to stop resuscitation, code cessation and deciding what not to do during a code, in practice, is an art form. Familiarity with classic evidence suggesting most codes are unsuccessful may influence decisions about when to terminate resuscitative efforts, in effect enacting self-fulfilling prophesies. Code interventions and duration may be influenced by patient demographics, gender or a concern about the stewardship of scarce resources. Yet, recent evidence links longer code duration with improved outcomes, and advances in resuscitation techniques complicate attempts to standardise both resuscitation length and the application of advanced interventions. In this context of increasing clinical and moral uncertainty, discussions between patients, families and medical providers about resuscitation plans take on an increased degree of importance. For some patients, a 'bespoke' resuscitation plan may be in order.

AB - 'Calling' a code can be an ambiguous undertaking. Despite guidelines and the medical literature outlining when it is acceptable to stop resuscitation, code cessation and deciding what not to do during a code, in practice, is an art form. Familiarity with classic evidence suggesting most codes are unsuccessful may influence decisions about when to terminate resuscitative efforts, in effect enacting self-fulfilling prophesies. Code interventions and duration may be influenced by patient demographics, gender or a concern about the stewardship of scarce resources. Yet, recent evidence links longer code duration with improved outcomes, and advances in resuscitation techniques complicate attempts to standardise both resuscitation length and the application of advanced interventions. In this context of increasing clinical and moral uncertainty, discussions between patients, families and medical providers about resuscitation plans take on an increased degree of importance. For some patients, a 'bespoke' resuscitation plan may be in order.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938504903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938504903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2013-101949

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2013-101949

M3 - Article

C2 - 25249374

AN - SCOPUS:84938504903

VL - 41

SP - 663

EP - 666

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 8

ER -