"Hot Seat" Simulation Model for Conflict Resolution: A Pilot Study

Sara Kim, Elise Frans, Isaac Bohannon, Karen Barr, Elizabeth Buttrick, Ryan Fehr, Sarah Shannon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unresolved conflicts in health care threaten both clinician morale and quality of patient care. We piloted a training model that targeted clinicians' conflict resolution skills. METHODS: Sixty clinicians from local hospitals were randomized into an intervention group (n = 30), completing a 3-hour conflict resolution training session, and a control group (n = 30) without training. The training included facilitated practice with actors, coaching, and feedback. Evaluation of 60 participants' conflict resolution skills was done in videotaped simulations with actors portraying interprofessional colleagues. Global ratings and checklist items developed for assessing clinicians' performance mirrored steps in the conflict communication model. RESULTS: The intervention group's performance exceeded the control group on global scores, 7.2 of 10 (SD = 1.6) versus 5.6 (SD = 1.5), p < .05, and checklist scores, 9.3 of 11 (SD = 2.9) versus 7.9 (SD = 1.5), p < .05. Two checklist items showed statistically significant differences: (1) subjects opened the dialogue on a neutral ground before jumping into conflict discussions (intervention: 97% and control: 73%, p < .05) and (2) subjects elicited the colleague's story before sharing their own story (intervention: 70% and control: 27%, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The pilot results suggest that a health care-specific approach to conflict resolution can be effectively taught through facilitated practice, coaching, and feedback.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-186
Number of pages10
JournalJournal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Negotiating
Checklist
Delivery of Health Care
Morale
Control Groups
Quality of Health Care
Patient Care
Communication
Conflict (Psychology)
Mentoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

"Hot Seat" Simulation Model for Conflict Resolution : A Pilot Study. / Kim, Sara; Frans, Elise; Bohannon, Isaac; Barr, Karen; Buttrick, Elizabeth; Fehr, Ryan; Shannon, Sarah.

In: Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.07.2018, p. 177-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Sara ; Frans, Elise ; Bohannon, Isaac ; Barr, Karen ; Buttrick, Elizabeth ; Fehr, Ryan ; Shannon, Sarah. / "Hot Seat" Simulation Model for Conflict Resolution : A Pilot Study. In: Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. 2018 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 177-186.
@article{34af9a3474d845eebcffa973f1426614,
title = "{"}Hot Seat{"} Simulation Model for Conflict Resolution: A Pilot Study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Unresolved conflicts in health care threaten both clinician morale and quality of patient care. We piloted a training model that targeted clinicians' conflict resolution skills. METHODS: Sixty clinicians from local hospitals were randomized into an intervention group (n = 30), completing a 3-hour conflict resolution training session, and a control group (n = 30) without training. The training included facilitated practice with actors, coaching, and feedback. Evaluation of 60 participants' conflict resolution skills was done in videotaped simulations with actors portraying interprofessional colleagues. Global ratings and checklist items developed for assessing clinicians' performance mirrored steps in the conflict communication model. RESULTS: The intervention group's performance exceeded the control group on global scores, 7.2 of 10 (SD = 1.6) versus 5.6 (SD = 1.5), p < .05, and checklist scores, 9.3 of 11 (SD = 2.9) versus 7.9 (SD = 1.5), p < .05. Two checklist items showed statistically significant differences: (1) subjects opened the dialogue on a neutral ground before jumping into conflict discussions (intervention: 97{\%} and control: 73{\%}, p < .05) and (2) subjects elicited the colleague's story before sharing their own story (intervention: 70{\%} and control: 27{\%}, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The pilot results suggest that a health care-specific approach to conflict resolution can be effectively taught through facilitated practice, coaching, and feedback.",
author = "Sara Kim and Elise Frans and Isaac Bohannon and Karen Barr and Elizabeth Buttrick and Ryan Fehr and Sarah Shannon",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000081",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "177--186",
journal = "Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality",
issn = "1062-2551",
publisher = "National Association for Healthcare Quality",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Hot Seat" Simulation Model for Conflict Resolution

T2 - A Pilot Study

AU - Kim, Sara

AU - Frans, Elise

AU - Bohannon, Isaac

AU - Barr, Karen

AU - Buttrick, Elizabeth

AU - Fehr, Ryan

AU - Shannon, Sarah

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Unresolved conflicts in health care threaten both clinician morale and quality of patient care. We piloted a training model that targeted clinicians' conflict resolution skills. METHODS: Sixty clinicians from local hospitals were randomized into an intervention group (n = 30), completing a 3-hour conflict resolution training session, and a control group (n = 30) without training. The training included facilitated practice with actors, coaching, and feedback. Evaluation of 60 participants' conflict resolution skills was done in videotaped simulations with actors portraying interprofessional colleagues. Global ratings and checklist items developed for assessing clinicians' performance mirrored steps in the conflict communication model. RESULTS: The intervention group's performance exceeded the control group on global scores, 7.2 of 10 (SD = 1.6) versus 5.6 (SD = 1.5), p < .05, and checklist scores, 9.3 of 11 (SD = 2.9) versus 7.9 (SD = 1.5), p < .05. Two checklist items showed statistically significant differences: (1) subjects opened the dialogue on a neutral ground before jumping into conflict discussions (intervention: 97% and control: 73%, p < .05) and (2) subjects elicited the colleague's story before sharing their own story (intervention: 70% and control: 27%, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The pilot results suggest that a health care-specific approach to conflict resolution can be effectively taught through facilitated practice, coaching, and feedback.

AB - BACKGROUND: Unresolved conflicts in health care threaten both clinician morale and quality of patient care. We piloted a training model that targeted clinicians' conflict resolution skills. METHODS: Sixty clinicians from local hospitals were randomized into an intervention group (n = 30), completing a 3-hour conflict resolution training session, and a control group (n = 30) without training. The training included facilitated practice with actors, coaching, and feedback. Evaluation of 60 participants' conflict resolution skills was done in videotaped simulations with actors portraying interprofessional colleagues. Global ratings and checklist items developed for assessing clinicians' performance mirrored steps in the conflict communication model. RESULTS: The intervention group's performance exceeded the control group on global scores, 7.2 of 10 (SD = 1.6) versus 5.6 (SD = 1.5), p < .05, and checklist scores, 9.3 of 11 (SD = 2.9) versus 7.9 (SD = 1.5), p < .05. Two checklist items showed statistically significant differences: (1) subjects opened the dialogue on a neutral ground before jumping into conflict discussions (intervention: 97% and control: 73%, p < .05) and (2) subjects elicited the colleague's story before sharing their own story (intervention: 70% and control: 27%, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The pilot results suggest that a health care-specific approach to conflict resolution can be effectively taught through facilitated practice, coaching, and feedback.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061990045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061990045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000081

DO - 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000081

M3 - Article

C2 - 29975672

AN - SCOPUS:85061990045

VL - 40

SP - 177

EP - 186

JO - Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality

JF - Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality

SN - 1062-2551

IS - 4

ER -