Hard Copy Durable Patient Cancer Education Materials: Do They Still Matter?

Darryl Schuitevoerder, Jeanine Fortino, John Vetto

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Traditional hard copy information materials are still present in our cancer clinics. While their actual impact on patient care often goes un-assessed, it is important to understand their role in today’s electronic age where information can easily be obtained from various sources. It has remained the practice in our melanoma clinic to provide an information booklet to all of our new patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how useful this booklet was, as well as determine the current resources our patients use to gather cancer information. All patients referred to the clinic in the previous 3 years were pooled from our prospective, IRB-approved, melanoma sentinel node database. Of these 205 patients, a valid email address was listed for 147. A ten-question survey was emailed to all of these patients, who were not told ahead of time that their experience with the booklet would be studied. Seventy-seven of the 147 (52 %) patients polled responded. Fifty-eight (75 %) remembered receiving the booklet at their initial consultation. Forty-four (76 %) of those patients rated it as extremely or very useful, and no patients reported the booklet as not useful at all. Eighty-eight percent of respondents found the information to be clear and helpful. Sixty-four percent remembered the provider reviewing the material with them, and nearly all of these patients found that helpful. When asked to rank the importance of the various resources for obtaining cancer information, providers were ranked as most important, followed by the information booklet and Internet information sites. Internet blogs and friends and family were rated as the least important sources of information. Even in the current electronic age, our results indicate that information shared by providers, including the hard copy education booklet, was the most important source of information for our newly referred melanoma patients.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-4
    Number of pages4
    JournalJournal of Cancer Education
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Jan 22 2016

    Fingerprint

    Patient Education
    Pamphlets
    Neoplasms
    Melanoma
    Internet
    Blogging
    Research Ethics Committees
    Patient Care
    Referral and Consultation
    Databases
    Education

    Keywords

    • Cancer education
    • Hard copy education materials
    • Melanoma

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    • Oncology

    Cite this

    Hard Copy Durable Patient Cancer Education Materials : Do They Still Matter? / Schuitevoerder, Darryl; Fortino, Jeanine; Vetto, John.

    In: Journal of Cancer Education, 22.01.2016, p. 1-4.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{91730c27c92d4f378b31579a3951ce3f,
    title = "Hard Copy Durable Patient Cancer Education Materials: Do They Still Matter?",
    abstract = "Traditional hard copy information materials are still present in our cancer clinics. While their actual impact on patient care often goes un-assessed, it is important to understand their role in today’s electronic age where information can easily be obtained from various sources. It has remained the practice in our melanoma clinic to provide an information booklet to all of our new patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how useful this booklet was, as well as determine the current resources our patients use to gather cancer information. All patients referred to the clinic in the previous 3 years were pooled from our prospective, IRB-approved, melanoma sentinel node database. Of these 205 patients, a valid email address was listed for 147. A ten-question survey was emailed to all of these patients, who were not told ahead of time that their experience with the booklet would be studied. Seventy-seven of the 147 (52 {\%}) patients polled responded. Fifty-eight (75 {\%}) remembered receiving the booklet at their initial consultation. Forty-four (76 {\%}) of those patients rated it as extremely or very useful, and no patients reported the booklet as not useful at all. Eighty-eight percent of respondents found the information to be clear and helpful. Sixty-four percent remembered the provider reviewing the material with them, and nearly all of these patients found that helpful. When asked to rank the importance of the various resources for obtaining cancer information, providers were ranked as most important, followed by the information booklet and Internet information sites. Internet blogs and friends and family were rated as the least important sources of information. Even in the current electronic age, our results indicate that information shared by providers, including the hard copy education booklet, was the most important source of information for our newly referred melanoma patients.",
    keywords = "Cancer education, Hard copy education materials, Melanoma",
    author = "Darryl Schuitevoerder and Jeanine Fortino and John Vetto",
    year = "2016",
    month = "1",
    day = "22",
    doi = "10.1007/s13187-016-0987-4",
    language = "English (US)",
    pages = "1--4",
    journal = "Journal of Cancer Education",
    issn = "0885-8195",
    publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Hard Copy Durable Patient Cancer Education Materials

    T2 - Do They Still Matter?

    AU - Schuitevoerder, Darryl

    AU - Fortino, Jeanine

    AU - Vetto, John

    PY - 2016/1/22

    Y1 - 2016/1/22

    N2 - Traditional hard copy information materials are still present in our cancer clinics. While their actual impact on patient care often goes un-assessed, it is important to understand their role in today’s electronic age where information can easily be obtained from various sources. It has remained the practice in our melanoma clinic to provide an information booklet to all of our new patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how useful this booklet was, as well as determine the current resources our patients use to gather cancer information. All patients referred to the clinic in the previous 3 years were pooled from our prospective, IRB-approved, melanoma sentinel node database. Of these 205 patients, a valid email address was listed for 147. A ten-question survey was emailed to all of these patients, who were not told ahead of time that their experience with the booklet would be studied. Seventy-seven of the 147 (52 %) patients polled responded. Fifty-eight (75 %) remembered receiving the booklet at their initial consultation. Forty-four (76 %) of those patients rated it as extremely or very useful, and no patients reported the booklet as not useful at all. Eighty-eight percent of respondents found the information to be clear and helpful. Sixty-four percent remembered the provider reviewing the material with them, and nearly all of these patients found that helpful. When asked to rank the importance of the various resources for obtaining cancer information, providers were ranked as most important, followed by the information booklet and Internet information sites. Internet blogs and friends and family were rated as the least important sources of information. Even in the current electronic age, our results indicate that information shared by providers, including the hard copy education booklet, was the most important source of information for our newly referred melanoma patients.

    AB - Traditional hard copy information materials are still present in our cancer clinics. While their actual impact on patient care often goes un-assessed, it is important to understand their role in today’s electronic age where information can easily be obtained from various sources. It has remained the practice in our melanoma clinic to provide an information booklet to all of our new patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how useful this booklet was, as well as determine the current resources our patients use to gather cancer information. All patients referred to the clinic in the previous 3 years were pooled from our prospective, IRB-approved, melanoma sentinel node database. Of these 205 patients, a valid email address was listed for 147. A ten-question survey was emailed to all of these patients, who were not told ahead of time that their experience with the booklet would be studied. Seventy-seven of the 147 (52 %) patients polled responded. Fifty-eight (75 %) remembered receiving the booklet at their initial consultation. Forty-four (76 %) of those patients rated it as extremely or very useful, and no patients reported the booklet as not useful at all. Eighty-eight percent of respondents found the information to be clear and helpful. Sixty-four percent remembered the provider reviewing the material with them, and nearly all of these patients found that helpful. When asked to rank the importance of the various resources for obtaining cancer information, providers were ranked as most important, followed by the information booklet and Internet information sites. Internet blogs and friends and family were rated as the least important sources of information. Even in the current electronic age, our results indicate that information shared by providers, including the hard copy education booklet, was the most important source of information for our newly referred melanoma patients.

    KW - Cancer education

    KW - Hard copy education materials

    KW - Melanoma

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955247998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955247998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s13187-016-0987-4

    DO - 10.1007/s13187-016-0987-4

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 26801508

    AN - SCOPUS:84955247998

    SP - 1

    EP - 4

    JO - Journal of Cancer Education

    JF - Journal of Cancer Education

    SN - 0885-8195

    ER -