Gender, Professional Experiences, and Personal Characteristics of Academic Radiation Oncology Chairs: Data to Inform the Pipeline for the 21st Century

Whitney H. Beeler, Kent A. Griffith, Rochelle D. Jones, Christina H. Chapman, Emma B. Holliday, Nafisha Lalani, Emily Wilson, James A. Bonner, Silvia Chiara Formenti, Stephen M. Hahn, Shalom Kalnicki, Fei Fei Liu, Benjamin Movsas, Charles Thomas, Reshma Jagsi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Understanding the pathways and gateways to leadership and challenges faced by individuals in such roles can inform efforts to promote diversity and equity. We sought to describe the professional experiences and personal characteristics of academic radiation oncology (RO) chairs and to evaluate whether differences exist by gender. Methods and Materials: Anonymous surveys were distributed to 95 chairs of RO departments during the 2016 annual meeting of the Society of Chairs of Academic Radiation Oncology Programs. The surveys included 28 closed-ended questions and the Leadership Practices Inventory. Results were analyzed by gender using χ 2 tests, rank-sum, and t tests (significance P <.05). Results: A total of 72 chairs responded (61 male, 10 female, 1 declined to identify gender) for a response rate of 76%. There were no significant gender differences in age, academic rank, publications, or prior leadership positions held at the time of the first chair appointment, but female respondents held significantly greater total direct funding from extramural grants than their male counterparts (median, $1.89 million [interquartile range, $0.5-$5 million] vs $0.25 million [interquartile range, $0-$1.0 million]; P =.006). Women were more likely to have spouses employed outside the home at time of their first chair appointment than men were, with a trend toward women experiencing greater difficulty relocating. Men and women identified budgeting and resource allocation as their greatest professional challenges. There were no gender differences in the Leadership Practices Inventory–identified leadership domains or professional goals. Conclusions: Female RO chairs are as equally qualified as men in terms of productivity or leadership skills, but they face distinct challenges in the context of a gender-structured society. The observation of higher grant funding among women at the time of chair appointment suggests a possible need for interventions such as unconscious bias training to ensure that selection processes do not unnecessarily hold women to a higher standard.

Fingerprint

Radiation Oncology
leadership
seats
radiation
Appointments and Schedules
budgeting
Resource Allocation
Organized Financing
rank tests
Nonparametric Statistics
resource allocation
Spouses
Publications
productivity
Observation
Equipment and Supplies
education
trends
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Gender, Professional Experiences, and Personal Characteristics of Academic Radiation Oncology Chairs : Data to Inform the Pipeline for the 21st Century. / Beeler, Whitney H.; Griffith, Kent A.; Jones, Rochelle D.; Chapman, Christina H.; Holliday, Emma B.; Lalani, Nafisha; Wilson, Emily; Bonner, James A.; Formenti, Silvia Chiara; Hahn, Stephen M.; Kalnicki, Shalom; Liu, Fei Fei; Movsas, Benjamin; Thomas, Charles; Jagsi, Reshma.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beeler, WH, Griffith, KA, Jones, RD, Chapman, CH, Holliday, EB, Lalani, N, Wilson, E, Bonner, JA, Formenti, SC, Hahn, SM, Kalnicki, S, Liu, FF, Movsas, B, Thomas, C & Jagsi, R 2019, 'Gender, Professional Experiences, and Personal Characteristics of Academic Radiation Oncology Chairs: Data to Inform the Pipeline for the 21st Century', International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.074
Beeler, Whitney H. ; Griffith, Kent A. ; Jones, Rochelle D. ; Chapman, Christina H. ; Holliday, Emma B. ; Lalani, Nafisha ; Wilson, Emily ; Bonner, James A. ; Formenti, Silvia Chiara ; Hahn, Stephen M. ; Kalnicki, Shalom ; Liu, Fei Fei ; Movsas, Benjamin ; Thomas, Charles ; Jagsi, Reshma. / Gender, Professional Experiences, and Personal Characteristics of Academic Radiation Oncology Chairs : Data to Inform the Pipeline for the 21st Century. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2019.
@article{014ef5a34bae4f8eb51c76d6d84e2bf4,
title = "Gender, Professional Experiences, and Personal Characteristics of Academic Radiation Oncology Chairs: Data to Inform the Pipeline for the 21st Century",
abstract = "Purpose: Understanding the pathways and gateways to leadership and challenges faced by individuals in such roles can inform efforts to promote diversity and equity. We sought to describe the professional experiences and personal characteristics of academic radiation oncology (RO) chairs and to evaluate whether differences exist by gender. Methods and Materials: Anonymous surveys were distributed to 95 chairs of RO departments during the 2016 annual meeting of the Society of Chairs of Academic Radiation Oncology Programs. The surveys included 28 closed-ended questions and the Leadership Practices Inventory. Results were analyzed by gender using χ 2 tests, rank-sum, and t tests (significance P <.05). Results: A total of 72 chairs responded (61 male, 10 female, 1 declined to identify gender) for a response rate of 76{\%}. There were no significant gender differences in age, academic rank, publications, or prior leadership positions held at the time of the first chair appointment, but female respondents held significantly greater total direct funding from extramural grants than their male counterparts (median, $1.89 million [interquartile range, $0.5-$5 million] vs $0.25 million [interquartile range, $0-$1.0 million]; P =.006). Women were more likely to have spouses employed outside the home at time of their first chair appointment than men were, with a trend toward women experiencing greater difficulty relocating. Men and women identified budgeting and resource allocation as their greatest professional challenges. There were no gender differences in the Leadership Practices Inventory–identified leadership domains or professional goals. Conclusions: Female RO chairs are as equally qualified as men in terms of productivity or leadership skills, but they face distinct challenges in the context of a gender-structured society. The observation of higher grant funding among women at the time of chair appointment suggests a possible need for interventions such as unconscious bias training to ensure that selection processes do not unnecessarily hold women to a higher standard.",
author = "Beeler, {Whitney H.} and Griffith, {Kent A.} and Jones, {Rochelle D.} and Chapman, {Christina H.} and Holliday, {Emma B.} and Nafisha Lalani and Emily Wilson and Bonner, {James A.} and Formenti, {Silvia Chiara} and Hahn, {Stephen M.} and Shalom Kalnicki and Liu, {Fei Fei} and Benjamin Movsas and Charles Thomas and Reshma Jagsi",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.074",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender, Professional Experiences, and Personal Characteristics of Academic Radiation Oncology Chairs

T2 - Data to Inform the Pipeline for the 21st Century

AU - Beeler, Whitney H.

AU - Griffith, Kent A.

AU - Jones, Rochelle D.

AU - Chapman, Christina H.

AU - Holliday, Emma B.

AU - Lalani, Nafisha

AU - Wilson, Emily

AU - Bonner, James A.

AU - Formenti, Silvia Chiara

AU - Hahn, Stephen M.

AU - Kalnicki, Shalom

AU - Liu, Fei Fei

AU - Movsas, Benjamin

AU - Thomas, Charles

AU - Jagsi, Reshma

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Understanding the pathways and gateways to leadership and challenges faced by individuals in such roles can inform efforts to promote diversity and equity. We sought to describe the professional experiences and personal characteristics of academic radiation oncology (RO) chairs and to evaluate whether differences exist by gender. Methods and Materials: Anonymous surveys were distributed to 95 chairs of RO departments during the 2016 annual meeting of the Society of Chairs of Academic Radiation Oncology Programs. The surveys included 28 closed-ended questions and the Leadership Practices Inventory. Results were analyzed by gender using χ 2 tests, rank-sum, and t tests (significance P <.05). Results: A total of 72 chairs responded (61 male, 10 female, 1 declined to identify gender) for a response rate of 76%. There were no significant gender differences in age, academic rank, publications, or prior leadership positions held at the time of the first chair appointment, but female respondents held significantly greater total direct funding from extramural grants than their male counterparts (median, $1.89 million [interquartile range, $0.5-$5 million] vs $0.25 million [interquartile range, $0-$1.0 million]; P =.006). Women were more likely to have spouses employed outside the home at time of their first chair appointment than men were, with a trend toward women experiencing greater difficulty relocating. Men and women identified budgeting and resource allocation as their greatest professional challenges. There were no gender differences in the Leadership Practices Inventory–identified leadership domains or professional goals. Conclusions: Female RO chairs are as equally qualified as men in terms of productivity or leadership skills, but they face distinct challenges in the context of a gender-structured society. The observation of higher grant funding among women at the time of chair appointment suggests a possible need for interventions such as unconscious bias training to ensure that selection processes do not unnecessarily hold women to a higher standard.

AB - Purpose: Understanding the pathways and gateways to leadership and challenges faced by individuals in such roles can inform efforts to promote diversity and equity. We sought to describe the professional experiences and personal characteristics of academic radiation oncology (RO) chairs and to evaluate whether differences exist by gender. Methods and Materials: Anonymous surveys were distributed to 95 chairs of RO departments during the 2016 annual meeting of the Society of Chairs of Academic Radiation Oncology Programs. The surveys included 28 closed-ended questions and the Leadership Practices Inventory. Results were analyzed by gender using χ 2 tests, rank-sum, and t tests (significance P <.05). Results: A total of 72 chairs responded (61 male, 10 female, 1 declined to identify gender) for a response rate of 76%. There were no significant gender differences in age, academic rank, publications, or prior leadership positions held at the time of the first chair appointment, but female respondents held significantly greater total direct funding from extramural grants than their male counterparts (median, $1.89 million [interquartile range, $0.5-$5 million] vs $0.25 million [interquartile range, $0-$1.0 million]; P =.006). Women were more likely to have spouses employed outside the home at time of their first chair appointment than men were, with a trend toward women experiencing greater difficulty relocating. Men and women identified budgeting and resource allocation as their greatest professional challenges. There were no gender differences in the Leadership Practices Inventory–identified leadership domains or professional goals. Conclusions: Female RO chairs are as equally qualified as men in terms of productivity or leadership skills, but they face distinct challenges in the context of a gender-structured society. The observation of higher grant funding among women at the time of chair appointment suggests a possible need for interventions such as unconscious bias training to ensure that selection processes do not unnecessarily hold women to a higher standard.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062189423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062189423&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.074

DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.074

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062189423

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

ER -