Friction and orthodontic mechanics

Clinical studies of moment and ligation effects

Laura Iwasaki, Mark W. Beatty, Jeffrey Nickel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The efficiency of tooth movement associated with orthodontic sliding mechanics can be compromised by friction between arch wire and tube or bracket slot. The described studies measured the apparent coefficient of static friction (μa) during sliding along an arch wire. Known moments were applied to simulate tooth tipping. Measurements tested whether intraoral vibration during gum chewing reduced friction. The first experiments measured intraoral friction associated with the sliding of 4 and 8 mm stainless steel (SS) tubes along a SS auxiliary arch wire, in 10 subjects. Mean intraoral μa for 4 and 8 mm tubes were 0.12 (SD = 0.04) and 0.17 (SD = 0.05), respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that μa was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for the longer tubes. Although intraoral vibration decreased μa compared with bench-top tests (P < 0.001), frictional resistance was never completely eliminated. The second experiments studied the effects of ligation. Ten professionals performed exercises to characterize average tight and loose SS ligation forces. These ligation forces (FNLigation), and those associated with elastic ligation, were reproduced by a calibrated operator in a modified intraoral device, where SS orthodontic brackets slid along a SS auxiliary wire. Ten subjects chewed gum with the device in place. Nested ANOVA and Tukey Honest Significant Difference tests determined the effects of ligation type and environment. No significant differences (P > 0.01) were found between ex vivo and intraoral μa values for tight and loose SS ligation. Intraoral values for μa were significantly greater than ex vivo values (P < 0.001) for elastic ligation. Overall, the results suggested that vibration introduced by gum chewing did not eliminate friction. Tipping moments and ligation forces were equally significant in determining frictional forces. As well, there was considerable intraoperator variation in FNLigation for SS ligatures. Variations in clinical ligation forces are likely to be equal or greater than these experimental data and have potential to affect treatment efficiency during orthodontic sliding mechanics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)290-297
Number of pages8
JournalSeminars in Orthodontics
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Friction
Mechanics
Stainless Steel
Ligation
Chewing Gum
Vibration
Orthodontics
Tooth Movement Techniques
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Orthodontic Friction
Clinical Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics

Cite this

Friction and orthodontic mechanics : Clinical studies of moment and ligation effects. / Iwasaki, Laura; Beatty, Mark W.; Nickel, Jeffrey.

In: Seminars in Orthodontics, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.01.2003, p. 290-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{60f8232c0c1241da9b841bcb24668a8c,
title = "Friction and orthodontic mechanics: Clinical studies of moment and ligation effects",
abstract = "The efficiency of tooth movement associated with orthodontic sliding mechanics can be compromised by friction between arch wire and tube or bracket slot. The described studies measured the apparent coefficient of static friction (μa) during sliding along an arch wire. Known moments were applied to simulate tooth tipping. Measurements tested whether intraoral vibration during gum chewing reduced friction. The first experiments measured intraoral friction associated with the sliding of 4 and 8 mm stainless steel (SS) tubes along a SS auxiliary arch wire, in 10 subjects. Mean intraoral μa for 4 and 8 mm tubes were 0.12 (SD = 0.04) and 0.17 (SD = 0.05), respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that μa was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for the longer tubes. Although intraoral vibration decreased μa compared with bench-top tests (P < 0.001), frictional resistance was never completely eliminated. The second experiments studied the effects of ligation. Ten professionals performed exercises to characterize average tight and loose SS ligation forces. These ligation forces (FNLigation), and those associated with elastic ligation, were reproduced by a calibrated operator in a modified intraoral device, where SS orthodontic brackets slid along a SS auxiliary wire. Ten subjects chewed gum with the device in place. Nested ANOVA and Tukey Honest Significant Difference tests determined the effects of ligation type and environment. No significant differences (P > 0.01) were found between ex vivo and intraoral μa values for tight and loose SS ligation. Intraoral values for μa were significantly greater than ex vivo values (P < 0.001) for elastic ligation. Overall, the results suggested that vibration introduced by gum chewing did not eliminate friction. Tipping moments and ligation forces were equally significant in determining frictional forces. As well, there was considerable intraoperator variation in FNLigation for SS ligatures. Variations in clinical ligation forces are likely to be equal or greater than these experimental data and have potential to affect treatment efficiency during orthodontic sliding mechanics.",
author = "Laura Iwasaki and Beatty, {Mark W.} and Jeffrey Nickel",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.sodo.2003.08.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "290--297",
journal = "Seminars in Orthodontics",
issn = "1073-8746",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Friction and orthodontic mechanics

T2 - Clinical studies of moment and ligation effects

AU - Iwasaki, Laura

AU - Beatty, Mark W.

AU - Nickel, Jeffrey

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - The efficiency of tooth movement associated with orthodontic sliding mechanics can be compromised by friction between arch wire and tube or bracket slot. The described studies measured the apparent coefficient of static friction (μa) during sliding along an arch wire. Known moments were applied to simulate tooth tipping. Measurements tested whether intraoral vibration during gum chewing reduced friction. The first experiments measured intraoral friction associated with the sliding of 4 and 8 mm stainless steel (SS) tubes along a SS auxiliary arch wire, in 10 subjects. Mean intraoral μa for 4 and 8 mm tubes were 0.12 (SD = 0.04) and 0.17 (SD = 0.05), respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that μa was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for the longer tubes. Although intraoral vibration decreased μa compared with bench-top tests (P < 0.001), frictional resistance was never completely eliminated. The second experiments studied the effects of ligation. Ten professionals performed exercises to characterize average tight and loose SS ligation forces. These ligation forces (FNLigation), and those associated with elastic ligation, were reproduced by a calibrated operator in a modified intraoral device, where SS orthodontic brackets slid along a SS auxiliary wire. Ten subjects chewed gum with the device in place. Nested ANOVA and Tukey Honest Significant Difference tests determined the effects of ligation type and environment. No significant differences (P > 0.01) were found between ex vivo and intraoral μa values for tight and loose SS ligation. Intraoral values for μa were significantly greater than ex vivo values (P < 0.001) for elastic ligation. Overall, the results suggested that vibration introduced by gum chewing did not eliminate friction. Tipping moments and ligation forces were equally significant in determining frictional forces. As well, there was considerable intraoperator variation in FNLigation for SS ligatures. Variations in clinical ligation forces are likely to be equal or greater than these experimental data and have potential to affect treatment efficiency during orthodontic sliding mechanics.

AB - The efficiency of tooth movement associated with orthodontic sliding mechanics can be compromised by friction between arch wire and tube or bracket slot. The described studies measured the apparent coefficient of static friction (μa) during sliding along an arch wire. Known moments were applied to simulate tooth tipping. Measurements tested whether intraoral vibration during gum chewing reduced friction. The first experiments measured intraoral friction associated with the sliding of 4 and 8 mm stainless steel (SS) tubes along a SS auxiliary arch wire, in 10 subjects. Mean intraoral μa for 4 and 8 mm tubes were 0.12 (SD = 0.04) and 0.17 (SD = 0.05), respectively. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that μa was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for the longer tubes. Although intraoral vibration decreased μa compared with bench-top tests (P < 0.001), frictional resistance was never completely eliminated. The second experiments studied the effects of ligation. Ten professionals performed exercises to characterize average tight and loose SS ligation forces. These ligation forces (FNLigation), and those associated with elastic ligation, were reproduced by a calibrated operator in a modified intraoral device, where SS orthodontic brackets slid along a SS auxiliary wire. Ten subjects chewed gum with the device in place. Nested ANOVA and Tukey Honest Significant Difference tests determined the effects of ligation type and environment. No significant differences (P > 0.01) were found between ex vivo and intraoral μa values for tight and loose SS ligation. Intraoral values for μa were significantly greater than ex vivo values (P < 0.001) for elastic ligation. Overall, the results suggested that vibration introduced by gum chewing did not eliminate friction. Tipping moments and ligation forces were equally significant in determining frictional forces. As well, there was considerable intraoperator variation in FNLigation for SS ligatures. Variations in clinical ligation forces are likely to be equal or greater than these experimental data and have potential to affect treatment efficiency during orthodontic sliding mechanics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345832392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345832392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.sodo.2003.08.008

DO - 10.1016/j.sodo.2003.08.008

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 290

EP - 297

JO - Seminars in Orthodontics

JF - Seminars in Orthodontics

SN - 1073-8746

IS - 4

ER -