Food availability and food access in rural agricultural communities: Use of mixed methods

Linda K. Ko, Cassandra Enzler, Cynthia Perry, Edgar Rodriguez, Norma Mariscal, Sandra Linde, Catherine Duggan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Hispanics bear some of the highest burden of the obesity epidemic and the disparities gap is bigger among Hispanics in rural communities. This mixed methods study examined the objective and subjective assessment of food availability and food access in four rural, agricultural, and predominantly Hispanic communities. Methods: In this convergent parallel mixed methods study, we used the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS) of Food Stores and Restaurants to objectively assess 57 food stores and 69 restaurants in four rural agricultural communities in Washington State. To complement the objective assessment findings, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 community residents. The data were collected from 2013 to 2014. Frequencies and means were calculated for quantitative data and content analysis conducted for interview data. Results: Participants (n = 32) had a mean age of 35.6 (SD 6.2) years, were mostly women, uninsured, low income, and had less than a high school education. Grocery and convenience stores had low NEMS composite scores indicating low overall availability of food items, low quality, and high food prices. Composite scores for sit-down restaurants, fast casual restaurants, and fast-food restaurants were similarly low in all four towns indicating limited availability of healthier options. Semi-structured interviews revealed participants perceived high availability and accessibility of quality fresh produce. Most participants reported eating out regularly several times a week, frequenting restaurant chains that serve buffets or fast foods, and allowing children to make decisions regarding their own food choices. Conclusions: Community members' perception of food availability and food access may be different from the objective assessment of food environment. This information can be used to inform community-wide interventions to address food environment in these rural communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number34
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 16 2018

Fingerprint

Rural Population
Restaurants
Food
Hispanic Americans
Fast Foods
Interviews
Food Quality
Obesity
Eating
Education

Keywords

  • Food environment
  • Hispanics
  • Mixed methods
  • Rural communities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Food availability and food access in rural agricultural communities : Use of mixed methods. / Ko, Linda K.; Enzler, Cassandra; Perry, Cynthia; Rodriguez, Edgar; Mariscal, Norma; Linde, Sandra; Duggan, Catherine.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 1, 34, 16.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ko, Linda K. ; Enzler, Cassandra ; Perry, Cynthia ; Rodriguez, Edgar ; Mariscal, Norma ; Linde, Sandra ; Duggan, Catherine. / Food availability and food access in rural agricultural communities : Use of mixed methods. In: BMC Public Health. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 1.
@article{51400d8e5c6048ad818619edb8e59469,
title = "Food availability and food access in rural agricultural communities: Use of mixed methods",
abstract = "Background: Hispanics bear some of the highest burden of the obesity epidemic and the disparities gap is bigger among Hispanics in rural communities. This mixed methods study examined the objective and subjective assessment of food availability and food access in four rural, agricultural, and predominantly Hispanic communities. Methods: In this convergent parallel mixed methods study, we used the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS) of Food Stores and Restaurants to objectively assess 57 food stores and 69 restaurants in four rural agricultural communities in Washington State. To complement the objective assessment findings, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 community residents. The data were collected from 2013 to 2014. Frequencies and means were calculated for quantitative data and content analysis conducted for interview data. Results: Participants (n = 32) had a mean age of 35.6 (SD 6.2) years, were mostly women, uninsured, low income, and had less than a high school education. Grocery and convenience stores had low NEMS composite scores indicating low overall availability of food items, low quality, and high food prices. Composite scores for sit-down restaurants, fast casual restaurants, and fast-food restaurants were similarly low in all four towns indicating limited availability of healthier options. Semi-structured interviews revealed participants perceived high availability and accessibility of quality fresh produce. Most participants reported eating out regularly several times a week, frequenting restaurant chains that serve buffets or fast foods, and allowing children to make decisions regarding their own food choices. Conclusions: Community members' perception of food availability and food access may be different from the objective assessment of food environment. This information can be used to inform community-wide interventions to address food environment in these rural communities.",
keywords = "Food environment, Hispanics, Mixed methods, Rural communities",
author = "Ko, {Linda K.} and Cassandra Enzler and Cynthia Perry and Edgar Rodriguez and Norma Mariscal and Sandra Linde and Catherine Duggan",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-018-5547-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Food availability and food access in rural agricultural communities

T2 - Use of mixed methods

AU - Ko, Linda K.

AU - Enzler, Cassandra

AU - Perry, Cynthia

AU - Rodriguez, Edgar

AU - Mariscal, Norma

AU - Linde, Sandra

AU - Duggan, Catherine

PY - 2018/5/16

Y1 - 2018/5/16

N2 - Background: Hispanics bear some of the highest burden of the obesity epidemic and the disparities gap is bigger among Hispanics in rural communities. This mixed methods study examined the objective and subjective assessment of food availability and food access in four rural, agricultural, and predominantly Hispanic communities. Methods: In this convergent parallel mixed methods study, we used the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS) of Food Stores and Restaurants to objectively assess 57 food stores and 69 restaurants in four rural agricultural communities in Washington State. To complement the objective assessment findings, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 community residents. The data were collected from 2013 to 2014. Frequencies and means were calculated for quantitative data and content analysis conducted for interview data. Results: Participants (n = 32) had a mean age of 35.6 (SD 6.2) years, were mostly women, uninsured, low income, and had less than a high school education. Grocery and convenience stores had low NEMS composite scores indicating low overall availability of food items, low quality, and high food prices. Composite scores for sit-down restaurants, fast casual restaurants, and fast-food restaurants were similarly low in all four towns indicating limited availability of healthier options. Semi-structured interviews revealed participants perceived high availability and accessibility of quality fresh produce. Most participants reported eating out regularly several times a week, frequenting restaurant chains that serve buffets or fast foods, and allowing children to make decisions regarding their own food choices. Conclusions: Community members' perception of food availability and food access may be different from the objective assessment of food environment. This information can be used to inform community-wide interventions to address food environment in these rural communities.

AB - Background: Hispanics bear some of the highest burden of the obesity epidemic and the disparities gap is bigger among Hispanics in rural communities. This mixed methods study examined the objective and subjective assessment of food availability and food access in four rural, agricultural, and predominantly Hispanic communities. Methods: In this convergent parallel mixed methods study, we used the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS) of Food Stores and Restaurants to objectively assess 57 food stores and 69 restaurants in four rural agricultural communities in Washington State. To complement the objective assessment findings, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 community residents. The data were collected from 2013 to 2014. Frequencies and means were calculated for quantitative data and content analysis conducted for interview data. Results: Participants (n = 32) had a mean age of 35.6 (SD 6.2) years, were mostly women, uninsured, low income, and had less than a high school education. Grocery and convenience stores had low NEMS composite scores indicating low overall availability of food items, low quality, and high food prices. Composite scores for sit-down restaurants, fast casual restaurants, and fast-food restaurants were similarly low in all four towns indicating limited availability of healthier options. Semi-structured interviews revealed participants perceived high availability and accessibility of quality fresh produce. Most participants reported eating out regularly several times a week, frequenting restaurant chains that serve buffets or fast foods, and allowing children to make decisions regarding their own food choices. Conclusions: Community members' perception of food availability and food access may be different from the objective assessment of food environment. This information can be used to inform community-wide interventions to address food environment in these rural communities.

KW - Food environment

KW - Hispanics

KW - Mixed methods

KW - Rural communities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047207009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047207009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-018-5547-x

DO - 10.1186/s12889-018-5547-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 29769045

AN - SCOPUS:85047207009

VL - 18

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 34

ER -