Florida mammographer disability training vs needs

Ellen D S Lopez, Vijay Vasudevan, Melissa Lanzone, Eva Egensteiner, Elena Andresen, Elizabeth M. Hannold, Staci Graff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is currently no minimum required competency for mammographers regarding imaging patients with physical disabilities. Yet, as disability prevalence rates increase, mammographers interact with more women with disabilities at breast imaging facilities. Purpose: To better understand the disability training that mammographers receive and desire, and the advice they would extend to colleagues regarding improving the experience when performing mammography on women with disabilities. Methods: Within the context of a community and academic partnership, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with 14 mammographers practicing in north central Florida. Grounded theory techniques facilitated analysis for major themes. Results: The extent, content, and delivery of disability training varied among participants. Analysis revealed respondents' personal desires for training focused on positioning to "get the best breast image," while mammographers' advice to colleagues focused on the need to afford patience and respect to the patient. Four identified themes included learning on the job, asking for help, desired training to acquire the best possible image, and advice to other mammographers regarding patience. Conclusion: Mammographers value the disability training they receive as a foundation for continued learning on the job. Training should comprise both technical and social aspects of performing mammography on women with disabilities, including positioning, disability etiquette, and disability advocacy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-348
Number of pages12
JournalRadiologic Technology
Volume83
Issue number4
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Mammography
Breast
Learning
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires
Grounded Theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Lopez, E. D. S., Vasudevan, V., Lanzone, M., Egensteiner, E., Andresen, E., Hannold, E. M., & Graff, S. (2012). Florida mammographer disability training vs needs. Radiologic Technology, 83(4), 337-348.

Florida mammographer disability training vs needs. / Lopez, Ellen D S; Vasudevan, Vijay; Lanzone, Melissa; Egensteiner, Eva; Andresen, Elena; Hannold, Elizabeth M.; Graff, Staci.

In: Radiologic Technology, Vol. 83, No. 4, 03.2012, p. 337-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lopez, EDS, Vasudevan, V, Lanzone, M, Egensteiner, E, Andresen, E, Hannold, EM & Graff, S 2012, 'Florida mammographer disability training vs needs', Radiologic Technology, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 337-348.
Lopez EDS, Vasudevan V, Lanzone M, Egensteiner E, Andresen E, Hannold EM et al. Florida mammographer disability training vs needs. Radiologic Technology. 2012 Mar;83(4):337-348.
Lopez, Ellen D S ; Vasudevan, Vijay ; Lanzone, Melissa ; Egensteiner, Eva ; Andresen, Elena ; Hannold, Elizabeth M. ; Graff, Staci. / Florida mammographer disability training vs needs. In: Radiologic Technology. 2012 ; Vol. 83, No. 4. pp. 337-348.
@article{069a4bdfb01b4ccda294b058cd67617a,
title = "Florida mammographer disability training vs needs",
abstract = "Background: There is currently no minimum required competency for mammographers regarding imaging patients with physical disabilities. Yet, as disability prevalence rates increase, mammographers interact with more women with disabilities at breast imaging facilities. Purpose: To better understand the disability training that mammographers receive and desire, and the advice they would extend to colleagues regarding improving the experience when performing mammography on women with disabilities. Methods: Within the context of a community and academic partnership, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with 14 mammographers practicing in north central Florida. Grounded theory techniques facilitated analysis for major themes. Results: The extent, content, and delivery of disability training varied among participants. Analysis revealed respondents' personal desires for training focused on positioning to {"}get the best breast image,{"} while mammographers' advice to colleagues focused on the need to afford patience and respect to the patient. Four identified themes included learning on the job, asking for help, desired training to acquire the best possible image, and advice to other mammographers regarding patience. Conclusion: Mammographers value the disability training they receive as a foundation for continued learning on the job. Training should comprise both technical and social aspects of performing mammography on women with disabilities, including positioning, disability etiquette, and disability advocacy.",
author = "Lopez, {Ellen D S} and Vijay Vasudevan and Melissa Lanzone and Eva Egensteiner and Elena Andresen and Hannold, {Elizabeth M.} and Staci Graff",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "337--348",
journal = "Radiologic Technology",
issn = "0033-8397",
publisher = "Grune And Stratton",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Florida mammographer disability training vs needs

AU - Lopez, Ellen D S

AU - Vasudevan, Vijay

AU - Lanzone, Melissa

AU - Egensteiner, Eva

AU - Andresen, Elena

AU - Hannold, Elizabeth M.

AU - Graff, Staci

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Background: There is currently no minimum required competency for mammographers regarding imaging patients with physical disabilities. Yet, as disability prevalence rates increase, mammographers interact with more women with disabilities at breast imaging facilities. Purpose: To better understand the disability training that mammographers receive and desire, and the advice they would extend to colleagues regarding improving the experience when performing mammography on women with disabilities. Methods: Within the context of a community and academic partnership, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with 14 mammographers practicing in north central Florida. Grounded theory techniques facilitated analysis for major themes. Results: The extent, content, and delivery of disability training varied among participants. Analysis revealed respondents' personal desires for training focused on positioning to "get the best breast image," while mammographers' advice to colleagues focused on the need to afford patience and respect to the patient. Four identified themes included learning on the job, asking for help, desired training to acquire the best possible image, and advice to other mammographers regarding patience. Conclusion: Mammographers value the disability training they receive as a foundation for continued learning on the job. Training should comprise both technical and social aspects of performing mammography on women with disabilities, including positioning, disability etiquette, and disability advocacy.

AB - Background: There is currently no minimum required competency for mammographers regarding imaging patients with physical disabilities. Yet, as disability prevalence rates increase, mammographers interact with more women with disabilities at breast imaging facilities. Purpose: To better understand the disability training that mammographers receive and desire, and the advice they would extend to colleagues regarding improving the experience when performing mammography on women with disabilities. Methods: Within the context of a community and academic partnership, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with 14 mammographers practicing in north central Florida. Grounded theory techniques facilitated analysis for major themes. Results: The extent, content, and delivery of disability training varied among participants. Analysis revealed respondents' personal desires for training focused on positioning to "get the best breast image," while mammographers' advice to colleagues focused on the need to afford patience and respect to the patient. Four identified themes included learning on the job, asking for help, desired training to acquire the best possible image, and advice to other mammographers regarding patience. Conclusion: Mammographers value the disability training they receive as a foundation for continued learning on the job. Training should comprise both technical and social aspects of performing mammography on women with disabilities, including positioning, disability etiquette, and disability advocacy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866443516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866443516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 22461343

AN - SCOPUS:84866443516

VL - 83

SP - 337

EP - 348

JO - Radiologic Technology

JF - Radiologic Technology

SN - 0033-8397

IS - 4

ER -