Factors associated with research productivity in family practice residencies

O. F. Mills, S. J. Zyzanski, Sue Flocke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Research productivity and the associated features of research productivity in family practice residencies have not been well described. The objectives of this study are to describe residency research productivity and identify the set of independent factors that best characterize programs at various levels of productivity. Methods: A 23-item survey was mailed to 226 randomly selected family practice residency directors. The survey included items on program demographics, mentoring, resident and faculty research activities, and program research resources. Factor and discriminant analyses were performed to identify the major independent factors associated with productivity. Results: A total of 154 completed surveys were received for a response rate of 68%. Based on a cross tabulation of grants per program and publications per faculty, 22% of programs had high productivity, 46% had medium productivity, and 32% had low productivity. The significant factors of mentor support, amount of research activity, and program size contributed independently to the classification of programs by relative level of research productivity. These associations remained significant when university programs were excluded. Conclusions: Family practice residencies with relatively higher research productivity are more likely to have three characteristics than lower productivity programs: availability of a research mentor, more faculty research activities, and larger program size.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)188-193
Number of pages6
JournalFamily medicine
Volume27
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Family Practice
Internship and Residency
Research
Mentors
Organized Financing
Discriminant Analysis
Statistical Factor Analysis
Publications
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Factors associated with research productivity in family practice residencies. / Mills, O. F.; Zyzanski, S. J.; Flocke, Sue.

In: Family medicine, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.01.1995, p. 188-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mills, O. F. ; Zyzanski, S. J. ; Flocke, Sue. / Factors associated with research productivity in family practice residencies. In: Family medicine. 1995 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 188-193.
@article{3bd10c695a4f42fea0e3e5cd3c2ab331,
title = "Factors associated with research productivity in family practice residencies",
abstract = "Background: Research productivity and the associated features of research productivity in family practice residencies have not been well described. The objectives of this study are to describe residency research productivity and identify the set of independent factors that best characterize programs at various levels of productivity. Methods: A 23-item survey was mailed to 226 randomly selected family practice residency directors. The survey included items on program demographics, mentoring, resident and faculty research activities, and program research resources. Factor and discriminant analyses were performed to identify the major independent factors associated with productivity. Results: A total of 154 completed surveys were received for a response rate of 68{\%}. Based on a cross tabulation of grants per program and publications per faculty, 22{\%} of programs had high productivity, 46{\%} had medium productivity, and 32{\%} had low productivity. The significant factors of mentor support, amount of research activity, and program size contributed independently to the classification of programs by relative level of research productivity. These associations remained significant when university programs were excluded. Conclusions: Family practice residencies with relatively higher research productivity are more likely to have three characteristics than lower productivity programs: availability of a research mentor, more faculty research activities, and larger program size.",
author = "Mills, {O. F.} and Zyzanski, {S. J.} and Sue Flocke",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "188--193",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors associated with research productivity in family practice residencies

AU - Mills, O. F.

AU - Zyzanski, S. J.

AU - Flocke, Sue

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Background: Research productivity and the associated features of research productivity in family practice residencies have not been well described. The objectives of this study are to describe residency research productivity and identify the set of independent factors that best characterize programs at various levels of productivity. Methods: A 23-item survey was mailed to 226 randomly selected family practice residency directors. The survey included items on program demographics, mentoring, resident and faculty research activities, and program research resources. Factor and discriminant analyses were performed to identify the major independent factors associated with productivity. Results: A total of 154 completed surveys were received for a response rate of 68%. Based on a cross tabulation of grants per program and publications per faculty, 22% of programs had high productivity, 46% had medium productivity, and 32% had low productivity. The significant factors of mentor support, amount of research activity, and program size contributed independently to the classification of programs by relative level of research productivity. These associations remained significant when university programs were excluded. Conclusions: Family practice residencies with relatively higher research productivity are more likely to have three characteristics than lower productivity programs: availability of a research mentor, more faculty research activities, and larger program size.

AB - Background: Research productivity and the associated features of research productivity in family practice residencies have not been well described. The objectives of this study are to describe residency research productivity and identify the set of independent factors that best characterize programs at various levels of productivity. Methods: A 23-item survey was mailed to 226 randomly selected family practice residency directors. The survey included items on program demographics, mentoring, resident and faculty research activities, and program research resources. Factor and discriminant analyses were performed to identify the major independent factors associated with productivity. Results: A total of 154 completed surveys were received for a response rate of 68%. Based on a cross tabulation of grants per program and publications per faculty, 22% of programs had high productivity, 46% had medium productivity, and 32% had low productivity. The significant factors of mentor support, amount of research activity, and program size contributed independently to the classification of programs by relative level of research productivity. These associations remained significant when university programs were excluded. Conclusions: Family practice residencies with relatively higher research productivity are more likely to have three characteristics than lower productivity programs: availability of a research mentor, more faculty research activities, and larger program size.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028944190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028944190&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7774779

AN - SCOPUS:0028944190

VL - 27

SP - 188

EP - 193

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 3

ER -