Evaluation of risk communication in a mammography patient decision aid

Krystal A. Klein, Lindsey Watson, Joan Ash, Karen Eden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: We characterized patients' comprehension, memory, and impressions of risk communication messages in a patient decision aid (PtDA), Mammopad, and clarified perceived importance of numeric risk information in medical decision making. Methods: Participants were 75 women in their forties with average risk factors for breast cancer. We used mixed methods, comprising a risk estimation problem administered within a pretest-posttest design, and semi-structured qualitative interviews with a subsample of 21 women. Results: Participants' positive predictive value estimates of screening mammography improved after using Mammopad. Although risk information was only briefly memorable, through content analysis, we identified themes describing why participants value quantitative risk information, and obstacles to understanding. We describe ways the most complicated graphic was incompletely comprehended. Conclusions: Comprehension of risk information following Mammopad use could be improved. Patients valued receiving numeric statistical information, particularly in pictograph format. Obstacles to understanding risk information, including potential for confusion between statistics, should be identified and mitigated in PtDA design. Practice implications: Using simple pictographs accompanied by text, PtDAs may enhance a shared decision-making discussion. PtDA designers and providers should be aware of benefits and limitations of graphical risk presentations. Incorporating comprehension checks could help identify and correct misapprehensions of graphically presented statistics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 2 2015

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Mammography
Communication
Decision Making
Interviews
Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Mammography
  • Patient decision aid
  • Risk communication
  • Women's health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of risk communication in a mammography patient decision aid. / Klein, Krystal A.; Watson, Lindsey; Ash, Joan; Eden, Karen.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, 02.06.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0cd13f70c6a3402fbae357dc38bbfbb9,
title = "Evaluation of risk communication in a mammography patient decision aid",
abstract = "Objectives: We characterized patients' comprehension, memory, and impressions of risk communication messages in a patient decision aid (PtDA), Mammopad, and clarified perceived importance of numeric risk information in medical decision making. Methods: Participants were 75 women in their forties with average risk factors for breast cancer. We used mixed methods, comprising a risk estimation problem administered within a pretest-posttest design, and semi-structured qualitative interviews with a subsample of 21 women. Results: Participants' positive predictive value estimates of screening mammography improved after using Mammopad. Although risk information was only briefly memorable, through content analysis, we identified themes describing why participants value quantitative risk information, and obstacles to understanding. We describe ways the most complicated graphic was incompletely comprehended. Conclusions: Comprehension of risk information following Mammopad use could be improved. Patients valued receiving numeric statistical information, particularly in pictograph format. Obstacles to understanding risk information, including potential for confusion between statistics, should be identified and mitigated in PtDA design. Practice implications: Using simple pictographs accompanied by text, PtDAs may enhance a shared decision-making discussion. PtDA designers and providers should be aware of benefits and limitations of graphical risk presentations. Incorporating comprehension checks could help identify and correct misapprehensions of graphically presented statistics.",
keywords = "Mammography, Patient decision aid, Risk communication, Women's health",
author = "Klein, {Krystal A.} and Lindsey Watson and Joan Ash and Karen Eden",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2016.02.013",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of risk communication in a mammography patient decision aid

AU - Klein, Krystal A.

AU - Watson, Lindsey

AU - Ash, Joan

AU - Eden, Karen

PY - 2015/6/2

Y1 - 2015/6/2

N2 - Objectives: We characterized patients' comprehension, memory, and impressions of risk communication messages in a patient decision aid (PtDA), Mammopad, and clarified perceived importance of numeric risk information in medical decision making. Methods: Participants were 75 women in their forties with average risk factors for breast cancer. We used mixed methods, comprising a risk estimation problem administered within a pretest-posttest design, and semi-structured qualitative interviews with a subsample of 21 women. Results: Participants' positive predictive value estimates of screening mammography improved after using Mammopad. Although risk information was only briefly memorable, through content analysis, we identified themes describing why participants value quantitative risk information, and obstacles to understanding. We describe ways the most complicated graphic was incompletely comprehended. Conclusions: Comprehension of risk information following Mammopad use could be improved. Patients valued receiving numeric statistical information, particularly in pictograph format. Obstacles to understanding risk information, including potential for confusion between statistics, should be identified and mitigated in PtDA design. Practice implications: Using simple pictographs accompanied by text, PtDAs may enhance a shared decision-making discussion. PtDA designers and providers should be aware of benefits and limitations of graphical risk presentations. Incorporating comprehension checks could help identify and correct misapprehensions of graphically presented statistics.

AB - Objectives: We characterized patients' comprehension, memory, and impressions of risk communication messages in a patient decision aid (PtDA), Mammopad, and clarified perceived importance of numeric risk information in medical decision making. Methods: Participants were 75 women in their forties with average risk factors for breast cancer. We used mixed methods, comprising a risk estimation problem administered within a pretest-posttest design, and semi-structured qualitative interviews with a subsample of 21 women. Results: Participants' positive predictive value estimates of screening mammography improved after using Mammopad. Although risk information was only briefly memorable, through content analysis, we identified themes describing why participants value quantitative risk information, and obstacles to understanding. We describe ways the most complicated graphic was incompletely comprehended. Conclusions: Comprehension of risk information following Mammopad use could be improved. Patients valued receiving numeric statistical information, particularly in pictograph format. Obstacles to understanding risk information, including potential for confusion between statistics, should be identified and mitigated in PtDA design. Practice implications: Using simple pictographs accompanied by text, PtDAs may enhance a shared decision-making discussion. PtDA designers and providers should be aware of benefits and limitations of graphical risk presentations. Incorporating comprehension checks could help identify and correct misapprehensions of graphically presented statistics.

KW - Mammography

KW - Patient decision aid

KW - Risk communication

KW - Women's health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959543369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959543369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2016.02.013

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2016.02.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 26965020

AN - SCOPUS:84959543369

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

ER -