Evaluation of minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer

Ninh T. Nguyen, Peter F. Roberts, David M. Follette, Derek Lau, John Lee, Shiro Urayama, Bruce Wolfe, James E. Goodnight

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Conventional imaging studies (computed tomography and endoscopic esophageal ultrasonography) used for preoperative evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer can be inaccurate for detection of small metastatic deposits. We evaluated the efficacy of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) staging as an additional modality for evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: Between December 1998 and February 2001, 33 patients with esophageal cancer were evaluated for surgical resection. Conventional imaging studies demonstrated operable disease in 31 patients and equivocal findings in 2 patients. All patients then underwent MIS staging (laparoscopy, bronchoscopy, and ultrasonography of the liver). We compared the results from surgical resection and MIS staging with those from conventional imaging. Results: MIS staging altered the treatment plan in 12 (36%) of 33 patients; MIS staging upstaged 10 patients with operable disease and downstaged 2 patients with equivocal findings. MIS staging accurately determined resectability in 97% of patients compared with 61% of patients staged by conventional imaging. The specificity and negative predictive value for detection of unsuspected metastatic disease in MIS staging were 100% and 96%, respectively, compared with 91% and 65%, respectively, for conventional imaging studies. Conclusion: In addition to conventional imaging studies, MIS staging should be included routinely in the preoperative work-up of patients with esophageal cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)702-706
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume182
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esophageal Neoplasms
Endosonography
Bronchoscopy
Laparoscopy
Ultrasonography
Tomography

Keywords

  • Esophageal cancer
  • Laparoscopic staging
  • Laparoscopic ultrasonography
  • Thoracoscopic staging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Nguyen, N. T., Roberts, P. F., Follette, D. M., Lau, D., Lee, J., Urayama, S., ... Goodnight, J. E. (2001). Evaluation of minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer. American Journal of Surgery, 182(6), 702-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00804-2

Evaluation of minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer. / Nguyen, Ninh T.; Roberts, Peter F.; Follette, David M.; Lau, Derek; Lee, John; Urayama, Shiro; Wolfe, Bruce; Goodnight, James E.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 182, No. 6, 2001, p. 702-706.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguyen, NT, Roberts, PF, Follette, DM, Lau, D, Lee, J, Urayama, S, Wolfe, B & Goodnight, JE 2001, 'Evaluation of minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 182, no. 6, pp. 702-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00804-2
Nguyen, Ninh T. ; Roberts, Peter F. ; Follette, David M. ; Lau, Derek ; Lee, John ; Urayama, Shiro ; Wolfe, Bruce ; Goodnight, James E. / Evaluation of minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2001 ; Vol. 182, No. 6. pp. 702-706.
@article{887518ca6a7b4429be08377668965f9a,
title = "Evaluation of minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer",
abstract = "Background: Conventional imaging studies (computed tomography and endoscopic esophageal ultrasonography) used for preoperative evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer can be inaccurate for detection of small metastatic deposits. We evaluated the efficacy of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) staging as an additional modality for evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: Between December 1998 and February 2001, 33 patients with esophageal cancer were evaluated for surgical resection. Conventional imaging studies demonstrated operable disease in 31 patients and equivocal findings in 2 patients. All patients then underwent MIS staging (laparoscopy, bronchoscopy, and ultrasonography of the liver). We compared the results from surgical resection and MIS staging with those from conventional imaging. Results: MIS staging altered the treatment plan in 12 (36{\%}) of 33 patients; MIS staging upstaged 10 patients with operable disease and downstaged 2 patients with equivocal findings. MIS staging accurately determined resectability in 97{\%} of patients compared with 61{\%} of patients staged by conventional imaging. The specificity and negative predictive value for detection of unsuspected metastatic disease in MIS staging were 100{\%} and 96{\%}, respectively, compared with 91{\%} and 65{\%}, respectively, for conventional imaging studies. Conclusion: In addition to conventional imaging studies, MIS staging should be included routinely in the preoperative work-up of patients with esophageal cancer.",
keywords = "Esophageal cancer, Laparoscopic staging, Laparoscopic ultrasonography, Thoracoscopic staging",
author = "Nguyen, {Ninh T.} and Roberts, {Peter F.} and Follette, {David M.} and Derek Lau and John Lee and Shiro Urayama and Bruce Wolfe and Goodnight, {James E.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00804-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "182",
pages = "702--706",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of minimally invasive surgical staging for esophageal cancer

AU - Nguyen, Ninh T.

AU - Roberts, Peter F.

AU - Follette, David M.

AU - Lau, Derek

AU - Lee, John

AU - Urayama, Shiro

AU - Wolfe, Bruce

AU - Goodnight, James E.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Background: Conventional imaging studies (computed tomography and endoscopic esophageal ultrasonography) used for preoperative evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer can be inaccurate for detection of small metastatic deposits. We evaluated the efficacy of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) staging as an additional modality for evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: Between December 1998 and February 2001, 33 patients with esophageal cancer were evaluated for surgical resection. Conventional imaging studies demonstrated operable disease in 31 patients and equivocal findings in 2 patients. All patients then underwent MIS staging (laparoscopy, bronchoscopy, and ultrasonography of the liver). We compared the results from surgical resection and MIS staging with those from conventional imaging. Results: MIS staging altered the treatment plan in 12 (36%) of 33 patients; MIS staging upstaged 10 patients with operable disease and downstaged 2 patients with equivocal findings. MIS staging accurately determined resectability in 97% of patients compared with 61% of patients staged by conventional imaging. The specificity and negative predictive value for detection of unsuspected metastatic disease in MIS staging were 100% and 96%, respectively, compared with 91% and 65%, respectively, for conventional imaging studies. Conclusion: In addition to conventional imaging studies, MIS staging should be included routinely in the preoperative work-up of patients with esophageal cancer.

AB - Background: Conventional imaging studies (computed tomography and endoscopic esophageal ultrasonography) used for preoperative evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer can be inaccurate for detection of small metastatic deposits. We evaluated the efficacy of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) staging as an additional modality for evaluation of patients with esophageal cancer. Methods: Between December 1998 and February 2001, 33 patients with esophageal cancer were evaluated for surgical resection. Conventional imaging studies demonstrated operable disease in 31 patients and equivocal findings in 2 patients. All patients then underwent MIS staging (laparoscopy, bronchoscopy, and ultrasonography of the liver). We compared the results from surgical resection and MIS staging with those from conventional imaging. Results: MIS staging altered the treatment plan in 12 (36%) of 33 patients; MIS staging upstaged 10 patients with operable disease and downstaged 2 patients with equivocal findings. MIS staging accurately determined resectability in 97% of patients compared with 61% of patients staged by conventional imaging. The specificity and negative predictive value for detection of unsuspected metastatic disease in MIS staging were 100% and 96%, respectively, compared with 91% and 65%, respectively, for conventional imaging studies. Conclusion: In addition to conventional imaging studies, MIS staging should be included routinely in the preoperative work-up of patients with esophageal cancer.

KW - Esophageal cancer

KW - Laparoscopic staging

KW - Laparoscopic ultrasonography

KW - Thoracoscopic staging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035707149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035707149&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00804-2

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00804-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 11839342

AN - SCOPUS:0035707149

VL - 182

SP - 702

EP - 706

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 6

ER -