Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging

which modality is best?

Aliya Qayyum, Daryl M. Chen, Richard S. Breiman, Antonio C. Westphalen, Benjamin M. Yeh, Kirk D. Jones, Ying Lu, Fergus Coakley, Peter W. Callen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) determination of diffuse liver steatosis. Materials and methods: Quantification of liver steatosis on ultrasound, CT, and MRI was correlated with histopathology in 67 patients. Results: Opposed-phase MRI demonstrated the highest correlation with steatosis (0.68 and 0.69, P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)110-115
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fatty Liver
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Keywords

  • Computed tomography (CT)
  • Liver, steatosis
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Ultrasound (US)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Qayyum, A., Chen, D. M., Breiman, R. S., Westphalen, A. C., Yeh, B. M., Jones, K. D., ... Callen, P. W. (2009). Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: which modality is best? Clinical Imaging, 33(2), 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.06.036

Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging : which modality is best? / Qayyum, Aliya; Chen, Daryl M.; Breiman, Richard S.; Westphalen, Antonio C.; Yeh, Benjamin M.; Jones, Kirk D.; Lu, Ying; Coakley, Fergus; Callen, Peter W.

In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 33, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 110-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Qayyum, Aliya ; Chen, Daryl M. ; Breiman, Richard S. ; Westphalen, Antonio C. ; Yeh, Benjamin M. ; Jones, Kirk D. ; Lu, Ying ; Coakley, Fergus ; Callen, Peter W. / Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging : which modality is best?. In: Clinical Imaging. 2009 ; Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 110-115.
@article{8870ff66abba4001b5d4a4e2479f5a8b,
title = "Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: which modality is best?",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) determination of diffuse liver steatosis. Materials and methods: Quantification of liver steatosis on ultrasound, CT, and MRI was correlated with histopathology in 67 patients. Results: Opposed-phase MRI demonstrated the highest correlation with steatosis (0.68 and 0.69, P",
keywords = "Computed tomography (CT), Liver, steatosis, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Ultrasound (US)",
author = "Aliya Qayyum and Chen, {Daryl M.} and Breiman, {Richard S.} and Westphalen, {Antonio C.} and Yeh, {Benjamin M.} and Jones, {Kirk D.} and Ying Lu and Fergus Coakley and Callen, {Peter W.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.06.036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "110--115",
journal = "Clinical Imaging",
issn = "0899-7071",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging

T2 - which modality is best?

AU - Qayyum, Aliya

AU - Chen, Daryl M.

AU - Breiman, Richard S.

AU - Westphalen, Antonio C.

AU - Yeh, Benjamin M.

AU - Jones, Kirk D.

AU - Lu, Ying

AU - Coakley, Fergus

AU - Callen, Peter W.

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Purpose: To compare ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) determination of diffuse liver steatosis. Materials and methods: Quantification of liver steatosis on ultrasound, CT, and MRI was correlated with histopathology in 67 patients. Results: Opposed-phase MRI demonstrated the highest correlation with steatosis (0.68 and 0.69, P

AB - Purpose: To compare ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) determination of diffuse liver steatosis. Materials and methods: Quantification of liver steatosis on ultrasound, CT, and MRI was correlated with histopathology in 67 patients. Results: Opposed-phase MRI demonstrated the highest correlation with steatosis (0.68 and 0.69, P

KW - Computed tomography (CT)

KW - Liver, steatosis

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

KW - Ultrasound (US)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60349123454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60349123454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.06.036

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.06.036

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 110

EP - 115

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

IS - 2

ER -