Evaluation of a program to prevent head and spinal cord injuries: A comparison between middle school and high school

Alice E C Avolio, Fred L. Ramsey, Edward Neuwelt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

THIS STUDY WAS designed to test whether the Oregon THINK FIRST-Head and Spinal Cord Injury Prevention Program, developed for the high school audience and previously shown to have a beneficial effect, would have the same effect on students in middle school. During the spring of 1989, four schools (two high schools and two middle schools) participated. Two weeks before and after the presentation of the THINK FIRST program, 830 student questionnaires were distributed in classrooms. Questionnaire items were designed to measure knowledge, attitude, behavior, and demographic features. There was a significant difference between high school and middle school students on pretest knowledge. The average knowledge increase among all students was 0.81 correct responses (95% confidence interval: ±0.22) among 15 questions. The increment in knowledge did not differ significantly between high school and middle school students. One-way analysis of variance revealed no significant differences in pretest knowledge or knowledge increase associated with membership in Students Against Drunk Driving or acquaintance with someone having sustained a head or spinal cord injury. After the program, students were more likely to believe that there were actions they could take to keep from getting injured. However, there was no change in self-reported seat belt use and most students reported that they “never” wore a bike helmet. The findings suggest that the THINK FIRST program is appropriate and beneficial for viewing by middle school-aged students.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-562
Number of pages6
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume31
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Program Evaluation
Spinal Cord Injuries
Head
Students
Seat Belts
Head Protective Devices
Analysis of Variance
Demography
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Craniocerebral trauma
  • Educational intervention
  • Head injury
  • Injury prevention
  • Spinal cord injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Evaluation of a program to prevent head and spinal cord injuries : A comparison between middle school and high school. / Avolio, Alice E C; Ramsey, Fred L.; Neuwelt, Edward.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1992, p. 557-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f7aca4b7808947e8bfe7fbe9e76a8756,
title = "Evaluation of a program to prevent head and spinal cord injuries: A comparison between middle school and high school",
abstract = "THIS STUDY WAS designed to test whether the Oregon THINK FIRST-Head and Spinal Cord Injury Prevention Program, developed for the high school audience and previously shown to have a beneficial effect, would have the same effect on students in middle school. During the spring of 1989, four schools (two high schools and two middle schools) participated. Two weeks before and after the presentation of the THINK FIRST program, 830 student questionnaires were distributed in classrooms. Questionnaire items were designed to measure knowledge, attitude, behavior, and demographic features. There was a significant difference between high school and middle school students on pretest knowledge. The average knowledge increase among all students was 0.81 correct responses (95{\%} confidence interval: ±0.22) among 15 questions. The increment in knowledge did not differ significantly between high school and middle school students. One-way analysis of variance revealed no significant differences in pretest knowledge or knowledge increase associated with membership in Students Against Drunk Driving or acquaintance with someone having sustained a head or spinal cord injury. After the program, students were more likely to believe that there were actions they could take to keep from getting injured. However, there was no change in self-reported seat belt use and most students reported that they “never” wore a bike helmet. The findings suggest that the THINK FIRST program is appropriate and beneficial for viewing by middle school-aged students.",
keywords = "Craniocerebral trauma, Educational intervention, Head injury, Injury prevention, Spinal cord injury",
author = "Avolio, {Alice E C} and Ramsey, {Fred L.} and Edward Neuwelt",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "557--562",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a program to prevent head and spinal cord injuries

T2 - A comparison between middle school and high school

AU - Avolio, Alice E C

AU - Ramsey, Fred L.

AU - Neuwelt, Edward

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - THIS STUDY WAS designed to test whether the Oregon THINK FIRST-Head and Spinal Cord Injury Prevention Program, developed for the high school audience and previously shown to have a beneficial effect, would have the same effect on students in middle school. During the spring of 1989, four schools (two high schools and two middle schools) participated. Two weeks before and after the presentation of the THINK FIRST program, 830 student questionnaires were distributed in classrooms. Questionnaire items were designed to measure knowledge, attitude, behavior, and demographic features. There was a significant difference between high school and middle school students on pretest knowledge. The average knowledge increase among all students was 0.81 correct responses (95% confidence interval: ±0.22) among 15 questions. The increment in knowledge did not differ significantly between high school and middle school students. One-way analysis of variance revealed no significant differences in pretest knowledge or knowledge increase associated with membership in Students Against Drunk Driving or acquaintance with someone having sustained a head or spinal cord injury. After the program, students were more likely to believe that there were actions they could take to keep from getting injured. However, there was no change in self-reported seat belt use and most students reported that they “never” wore a bike helmet. The findings suggest that the THINK FIRST program is appropriate and beneficial for viewing by middle school-aged students.

AB - THIS STUDY WAS designed to test whether the Oregon THINK FIRST-Head and Spinal Cord Injury Prevention Program, developed for the high school audience and previously shown to have a beneficial effect, would have the same effect on students in middle school. During the spring of 1989, four schools (two high schools and two middle schools) participated. Two weeks before and after the presentation of the THINK FIRST program, 830 student questionnaires were distributed in classrooms. Questionnaire items were designed to measure knowledge, attitude, behavior, and demographic features. There was a significant difference between high school and middle school students on pretest knowledge. The average knowledge increase among all students was 0.81 correct responses (95% confidence interval: ±0.22) among 15 questions. The increment in knowledge did not differ significantly between high school and middle school students. One-way analysis of variance revealed no significant differences in pretest knowledge or knowledge increase associated with membership in Students Against Drunk Driving or acquaintance with someone having sustained a head or spinal cord injury. After the program, students were more likely to believe that there were actions they could take to keep from getting injured. However, there was no change in self-reported seat belt use and most students reported that they “never” wore a bike helmet. The findings suggest that the THINK FIRST program is appropriate and beneficial for viewing by middle school-aged students.

KW - Craniocerebral trauma

KW - Educational intervention

KW - Head injury

KW - Injury prevention

KW - Spinal cord injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026712381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026712381&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1307228

AN - SCOPUS:0026712381

VL - 31

SP - 557

EP - 562

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 3

ER -