Estimation theory and model parameter selection for therapeutic treatment plan optimization

L. Xing, J. G. Li, Andrei Pugachev, Q. T. Le, A. L. Boyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Treatment optimization is usually formulated as an inverse problem, which starts with a prescribed dose distribution and obtains an optimized solution under the guidance of an objective function. The solution is a compromise between the conflicting requirements of the target and sensitive structures. In this paper, the treatment plan optimization is formulated as an estimation problem of a discrete and possibly nonconvex system. The concept of preference function is introduced. Instead of prescribing a dose to a structure (or a set of voxels), the approach prioritizes the doses with different preference levels and reduces the problem into selecting a solution with a suitable estimator. The preference function provides a foundation for statistical analysis of the system and allows us to apply various techniques developed in statistical analysis to plan optimization. It is shown that an optimization based on a quadratic objective function is a special case of the formalism. A general two-step method for using a computer to determine the values of the model parameters is proposed. The approach provides an efficient way to include prior knowledge into the optimization process. The method is illustrated using a simplified two-pixel system as well as two clinical cases. The generality of the approach, coupled with promising demonstrations, indicates that the method has broad implications for radiotherapy treatment plan optimization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2348-2358
Number of pages11
JournalMedical Physics
Volume26
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Selection
Systems Analysis
Radiotherapy
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Intensity modulation
  • Inverse planning
  • Optimization
  • Statistical analysis
  • Treatment planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Estimation theory and model parameter selection for therapeutic treatment plan optimization. / Xing, L.; Li, J. G.; Pugachev, Andrei; Le, Q. T.; Boyer, A. L.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 26, No. 11, 01.01.1999, p. 2348-2358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Xing, L. ; Li, J. G. ; Pugachev, Andrei ; Le, Q. T. ; Boyer, A. L. / Estimation theory and model parameter selection for therapeutic treatment plan optimization. In: Medical Physics. 1999 ; Vol. 26, No. 11. pp. 2348-2358.
@article{ae6906f3f4304ca8af165bbfb0922c19,
title = "Estimation theory and model parameter selection for therapeutic treatment plan optimization",
abstract = "Treatment optimization is usually formulated as an inverse problem, which starts with a prescribed dose distribution and obtains an optimized solution under the guidance of an objective function. The solution is a compromise between the conflicting requirements of the target and sensitive structures. In this paper, the treatment plan optimization is formulated as an estimation problem of a discrete and possibly nonconvex system. The concept of preference function is introduced. Instead of prescribing a dose to a structure (or a set of voxels), the approach prioritizes the doses with different preference levels and reduces the problem into selecting a solution with a suitable estimator. The preference function provides a foundation for statistical analysis of the system and allows us to apply various techniques developed in statistical analysis to plan optimization. It is shown that an optimization based on a quadratic objective function is a special case of the formalism. A general two-step method for using a computer to determine the values of the model parameters is proposed. The approach provides an efficient way to include prior knowledge into the optimization process. The method is illustrated using a simplified two-pixel system as well as two clinical cases. The generality of the approach, coupled with promising demonstrations, indicates that the method has broad implications for radiotherapy treatment plan optimization.",
keywords = "Intensity modulation, Inverse planning, Optimization, Statistical analysis, Treatment planning",
author = "L. Xing and Li, {J. G.} and Andrei Pugachev and Le, {Q. T.} and Boyer, {A. L.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.598749",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "2348--2358",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimation theory and model parameter selection for therapeutic treatment plan optimization

AU - Xing, L.

AU - Li, J. G.

AU - Pugachev, Andrei

AU - Le, Q. T.

AU - Boyer, A. L.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Treatment optimization is usually formulated as an inverse problem, which starts with a prescribed dose distribution and obtains an optimized solution under the guidance of an objective function. The solution is a compromise between the conflicting requirements of the target and sensitive structures. In this paper, the treatment plan optimization is formulated as an estimation problem of a discrete and possibly nonconvex system. The concept of preference function is introduced. Instead of prescribing a dose to a structure (or a set of voxels), the approach prioritizes the doses with different preference levels and reduces the problem into selecting a solution with a suitable estimator. The preference function provides a foundation for statistical analysis of the system and allows us to apply various techniques developed in statistical analysis to plan optimization. It is shown that an optimization based on a quadratic objective function is a special case of the formalism. A general two-step method for using a computer to determine the values of the model parameters is proposed. The approach provides an efficient way to include prior knowledge into the optimization process. The method is illustrated using a simplified two-pixel system as well as two clinical cases. The generality of the approach, coupled with promising demonstrations, indicates that the method has broad implications for radiotherapy treatment plan optimization.

AB - Treatment optimization is usually formulated as an inverse problem, which starts with a prescribed dose distribution and obtains an optimized solution under the guidance of an objective function. The solution is a compromise between the conflicting requirements of the target and sensitive structures. In this paper, the treatment plan optimization is formulated as an estimation problem of a discrete and possibly nonconvex system. The concept of preference function is introduced. Instead of prescribing a dose to a structure (or a set of voxels), the approach prioritizes the doses with different preference levels and reduces the problem into selecting a solution with a suitable estimator. The preference function provides a foundation for statistical analysis of the system and allows us to apply various techniques developed in statistical analysis to plan optimization. It is shown that an optimization based on a quadratic objective function is a special case of the formalism. A general two-step method for using a computer to determine the values of the model parameters is proposed. The approach provides an efficient way to include prior knowledge into the optimization process. The method is illustrated using a simplified two-pixel system as well as two clinical cases. The generality of the approach, coupled with promising demonstrations, indicates that the method has broad implications for radiotherapy treatment plan optimization.

KW - Intensity modulation

KW - Inverse planning

KW - Optimization

KW - Statistical analysis

KW - Treatment planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032692577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032692577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.598749

DO - 10.1118/1.598749

M3 - Article

C2 - 10587216

AN - SCOPUS:0032692577

VL - 26

SP - 2348

EP - 2358

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 11

ER -