Establishing stable test performance in tests from the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS)

Diane Rohlman, Steffani Bailey, M. Brown, M. Blanock, Wyndham Anger, L. McCauley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research to identify adverse effects in humans chronically exposed to neurotoxic substances in the workplace or environment typically assesses people at one point in time in a cross-sectional study. The most widely used strategy employs performance measures taken from a single point in time and compares these with either performance of a control group or established normative data. However, multiple comparison points of the same people on the same test allow the dissection of acute - from chronic - exposure effects, among other important questions. When performance measures are used from multiple points in time, within-subject deviations are examined. For either research design, the goal is to minimize the effects of practice and to obtain stable performance on a test. Demographic variables such as age, education, and cultural background or ethnicity influence performance on neurobehavioral tests. These variables may also influence the development of stable performance. Different populations may have different learning curves so that stable performance on a test is achieved with different amounts of practice. This is especially important when making comparisons across groups that may not have equivalent backgrounds. The performance of three groups, English-speaking adults, Spanish-speaking adolescents, and Spanish-speaking migrant adolescents, was examined. Each group completed a battery of neurobehavioral tests from the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS) during four sessions. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to investigate performance across time. Tests measuring motor performance produced stable performance from the first session. More complex tasks that involved attention and memory showed a practice effect across sessions. (C) 2000 Intox Press, Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)715-724
Number of pages10
JournalNeuroToxicology
Volume21
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Behavioral Research
Dissection
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Learning Curve
Education
Workplace
Data storage equipment
Analysis of Variance
Research Design
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demography
Control Groups
Research
Population
Practice (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Computerized assessment
  • Latino
  • Migrant
  • Neurobehavioral assessment
  • Repeat testing
  • Test-retest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Establishing stable test performance in tests from the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS). / Rohlman, Diane; Bailey, Steffani; Brown, M.; Blanock, M.; Anger, Wyndham; McCauley, L.

In: NeuroToxicology, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2000, p. 715-724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de2bad38180c459c812226f47f6eda7a,
title = "Establishing stable test performance in tests from the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS)",
abstract = "Research to identify adverse effects in humans chronically exposed to neurotoxic substances in the workplace or environment typically assesses people at one point in time in a cross-sectional study. The most widely used strategy employs performance measures taken from a single point in time and compares these with either performance of a control group or established normative data. However, multiple comparison points of the same people on the same test allow the dissection of acute - from chronic - exposure effects, among other important questions. When performance measures are used from multiple points in time, within-subject deviations are examined. For either research design, the goal is to minimize the effects of practice and to obtain stable performance on a test. Demographic variables such as age, education, and cultural background or ethnicity influence performance on neurobehavioral tests. These variables may also influence the development of stable performance. Different populations may have different learning curves so that stable performance on a test is achieved with different amounts of practice. This is especially important when making comparisons across groups that may not have equivalent backgrounds. The performance of three groups, English-speaking adults, Spanish-speaking adolescents, and Spanish-speaking migrant adolescents, was examined. Each group completed a battery of neurobehavioral tests from the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS) during four sessions. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to investigate performance across time. Tests measuring motor performance produced stable performance from the first session. More complex tasks that involved attention and memory showed a practice effect across sessions. (C) 2000 Intox Press, Inc.",
keywords = "Computerized assessment, Latino, Migrant, Neurobehavioral assessment, Repeat testing, Test-retest",
author = "Diane Rohlman and Steffani Bailey and M. Brown and M. Blanock and Wyndham Anger and L. McCauley",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "715--724",
journal = "NeuroToxicology",
issn = "0161-813X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing stable test performance in tests from the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS)

AU - Rohlman, Diane

AU - Bailey, Steffani

AU - Brown, M.

AU - Blanock, M.

AU - Anger, Wyndham

AU - McCauley, L.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Research to identify adverse effects in humans chronically exposed to neurotoxic substances in the workplace or environment typically assesses people at one point in time in a cross-sectional study. The most widely used strategy employs performance measures taken from a single point in time and compares these with either performance of a control group or established normative data. However, multiple comparison points of the same people on the same test allow the dissection of acute - from chronic - exposure effects, among other important questions. When performance measures are used from multiple points in time, within-subject deviations are examined. For either research design, the goal is to minimize the effects of practice and to obtain stable performance on a test. Demographic variables such as age, education, and cultural background or ethnicity influence performance on neurobehavioral tests. These variables may also influence the development of stable performance. Different populations may have different learning curves so that stable performance on a test is achieved with different amounts of practice. This is especially important when making comparisons across groups that may not have equivalent backgrounds. The performance of three groups, English-speaking adults, Spanish-speaking adolescents, and Spanish-speaking migrant adolescents, was examined. Each group completed a battery of neurobehavioral tests from the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS) during four sessions. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to investigate performance across time. Tests measuring motor performance produced stable performance from the first session. More complex tasks that involved attention and memory showed a practice effect across sessions. (C) 2000 Intox Press, Inc.

AB - Research to identify adverse effects in humans chronically exposed to neurotoxic substances in the workplace or environment typically assesses people at one point in time in a cross-sectional study. The most widely used strategy employs performance measures taken from a single point in time and compares these with either performance of a control group or established normative data. However, multiple comparison points of the same people on the same test allow the dissection of acute - from chronic - exposure effects, among other important questions. When performance measures are used from multiple points in time, within-subject deviations are examined. For either research design, the goal is to minimize the effects of practice and to obtain stable performance on a test. Demographic variables such as age, education, and cultural background or ethnicity influence performance on neurobehavioral tests. These variables may also influence the development of stable performance. Different populations may have different learning curves so that stable performance on a test is achieved with different amounts of practice. This is especially important when making comparisons across groups that may not have equivalent backgrounds. The performance of three groups, English-speaking adults, Spanish-speaking adolescents, and Spanish-speaking migrant adolescents, was examined. Each group completed a battery of neurobehavioral tests from the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS) during four sessions. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to investigate performance across time. Tests measuring motor performance produced stable performance from the first session. More complex tasks that involved attention and memory showed a practice effect across sessions. (C) 2000 Intox Press, Inc.

KW - Computerized assessment

KW - Latino

KW - Migrant

KW - Neurobehavioral assessment

KW - Repeat testing

KW - Test-retest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033660425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033660425&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 715

EP - 724

JO - NeuroToxicology

JF - NeuroToxicology

SN - 0161-813X

IS - 5

ER -