Efficacy of vertical infraclavicular plexus block vs. modified axillary plexus block

A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study

Florian M. Heid, J. Jage, M. Guth, N. Bauwe, Ansgar Brambrink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite containing severe risks, infraclavicular approaches to the brachial plexus gained increasing popularity. Likewise, the vertical infraclavicular plexus block improved anesthesia compared to the standard axillary approach but contains the risk of pneumothorax. Therefore we modified the standard axillary technique by inserting a proximal directed catheter, referred to as a high axillary plexus block. We prospectively compared quality and onset of neural blockade after vertical infraclavicular plexus block (VIP) and high axillary plexus block (HAP) in two randomized groups (30 patients in each). Methods: In group VIP the insulated needle was inserted midway between the ventral process of the acromion and the jugular notch. In group HAP, first an axillary needle was placed. Through this a stimulating catheter was inserted in a proximal direction (10-15 cm); correct placement was confirmed by nerve stimulation. All patients received 40 ml ropivacaine 0.75% (300mg). Discriminating between analgesia and anesthesia, a blinded observer assessed progression of neural blockade every 5 min for 60 min by pin prick. Incomplete blocks were supplemented 60 min after initial injection. Results: All patients in both groups demonstrated sufficient surgical anesthesia. No patient needed systemic supplementation or general anesthesia. However, vertical infraclavicular plexus block indicated superior anesthesia compared to high axillary plexus block, regarding musculocutaneous, axillary and radial nerve, which were completely blocked with a higher success rate and in a shorter time interval (P <0.05). Conclusions: While both techniques provide sufficient surgical anesthesia, vertical infraclavicular plexus block demonstrated a partially higher success rate and a faster onset than high axillary plexus block.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)677-682
Number of pages6
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

Anesthesia
Needles
Catheters
Musculocutaneous Nerve
Acromion
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Radial Nerve
Brachial Plexus
Pneumothorax
General Anesthesia
Neck
Injections

Keywords

  • Anesthetic techniques: regional
  • Axillary
  • Brachial plexus
  • Catheter
  • Infraclavicular block

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Efficacy of vertical infraclavicular plexus block vs. modified axillary plexus block : A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study. / Heid, Florian M.; Jage, J.; Guth, M.; Bauwe, N.; Brambrink, Ansgar.

In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 49, No. 5, 05.2005, p. 677-682.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heid, Florian M. ; Jage, J. ; Guth, M. ; Bauwe, N. ; Brambrink, Ansgar. / Efficacy of vertical infraclavicular plexus block vs. modified axillary plexus block : A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study. In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2005 ; Vol. 49, No. 5. pp. 677-682.
@article{9b9a4742043d4304b70f4a4151b55fac,
title = "Efficacy of vertical infraclavicular plexus block vs. modified axillary plexus block: A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study",
abstract = "Background: Despite containing severe risks, infraclavicular approaches to the brachial plexus gained increasing popularity. Likewise, the vertical infraclavicular plexus block improved anesthesia compared to the standard axillary approach but contains the risk of pneumothorax. Therefore we modified the standard axillary technique by inserting a proximal directed catheter, referred to as a high axillary plexus block. We prospectively compared quality and onset of neural blockade after vertical infraclavicular plexus block (VIP) and high axillary plexus block (HAP) in two randomized groups (30 patients in each). Methods: In group VIP the insulated needle was inserted midway between the ventral process of the acromion and the jugular notch. In group HAP, first an axillary needle was placed. Through this a stimulating catheter was inserted in a proximal direction (10-15 cm); correct placement was confirmed by nerve stimulation. All patients received 40 ml ropivacaine 0.75{\%} (300mg). Discriminating between analgesia and anesthesia, a blinded observer assessed progression of neural blockade every 5 min for 60 min by pin prick. Incomplete blocks were supplemented 60 min after initial injection. Results: All patients in both groups demonstrated sufficient surgical anesthesia. No patient needed systemic supplementation or general anesthesia. However, vertical infraclavicular plexus block indicated superior anesthesia compared to high axillary plexus block, regarding musculocutaneous, axillary and radial nerve, which were completely blocked with a higher success rate and in a shorter time interval (P <0.05). Conclusions: While both techniques provide sufficient surgical anesthesia, vertical infraclavicular plexus block demonstrated a partially higher success rate and a faster onset than high axillary plexus block.",
keywords = "Anesthetic techniques: regional, Axillary, Brachial plexus, Catheter, Infraclavicular block",
author = "Heid, {Florian M.} and J. Jage and M. Guth and N. Bauwe and Ansgar Brambrink",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00701.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "677--682",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of vertical infraclavicular plexus block vs. modified axillary plexus block

T2 - A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study

AU - Heid, Florian M.

AU - Jage, J.

AU - Guth, M.

AU - Bauwe, N.

AU - Brambrink, Ansgar

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - Background: Despite containing severe risks, infraclavicular approaches to the brachial plexus gained increasing popularity. Likewise, the vertical infraclavicular plexus block improved anesthesia compared to the standard axillary approach but contains the risk of pneumothorax. Therefore we modified the standard axillary technique by inserting a proximal directed catheter, referred to as a high axillary plexus block. We prospectively compared quality and onset of neural blockade after vertical infraclavicular plexus block (VIP) and high axillary plexus block (HAP) in two randomized groups (30 patients in each). Methods: In group VIP the insulated needle was inserted midway between the ventral process of the acromion and the jugular notch. In group HAP, first an axillary needle was placed. Through this a stimulating catheter was inserted in a proximal direction (10-15 cm); correct placement was confirmed by nerve stimulation. All patients received 40 ml ropivacaine 0.75% (300mg). Discriminating between analgesia and anesthesia, a blinded observer assessed progression of neural blockade every 5 min for 60 min by pin prick. Incomplete blocks were supplemented 60 min after initial injection. Results: All patients in both groups demonstrated sufficient surgical anesthesia. No patient needed systemic supplementation or general anesthesia. However, vertical infraclavicular plexus block indicated superior anesthesia compared to high axillary plexus block, regarding musculocutaneous, axillary and radial nerve, which were completely blocked with a higher success rate and in a shorter time interval (P <0.05). Conclusions: While both techniques provide sufficient surgical anesthesia, vertical infraclavicular plexus block demonstrated a partially higher success rate and a faster onset than high axillary plexus block.

AB - Background: Despite containing severe risks, infraclavicular approaches to the brachial plexus gained increasing popularity. Likewise, the vertical infraclavicular plexus block improved anesthesia compared to the standard axillary approach but contains the risk of pneumothorax. Therefore we modified the standard axillary technique by inserting a proximal directed catheter, referred to as a high axillary plexus block. We prospectively compared quality and onset of neural blockade after vertical infraclavicular plexus block (VIP) and high axillary plexus block (HAP) in two randomized groups (30 patients in each). Methods: In group VIP the insulated needle was inserted midway between the ventral process of the acromion and the jugular notch. In group HAP, first an axillary needle was placed. Through this a stimulating catheter was inserted in a proximal direction (10-15 cm); correct placement was confirmed by nerve stimulation. All patients received 40 ml ropivacaine 0.75% (300mg). Discriminating between analgesia and anesthesia, a blinded observer assessed progression of neural blockade every 5 min for 60 min by pin prick. Incomplete blocks were supplemented 60 min after initial injection. Results: All patients in both groups demonstrated sufficient surgical anesthesia. No patient needed systemic supplementation or general anesthesia. However, vertical infraclavicular plexus block indicated superior anesthesia compared to high axillary plexus block, regarding musculocutaneous, axillary and radial nerve, which were completely blocked with a higher success rate and in a shorter time interval (P <0.05). Conclusions: While both techniques provide sufficient surgical anesthesia, vertical infraclavicular plexus block demonstrated a partially higher success rate and a faster onset than high axillary plexus block.

KW - Anesthetic techniques: regional

KW - Axillary

KW - Brachial plexus

KW - Catheter

KW - Infraclavicular block

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17844377332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17844377332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00701.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00701.x

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 677

EP - 682

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 5

ER -