Effect of microbubble exposure to ultrasound on quantitation of myocardial perfusion

Howard Leong-Poi, James Swales, Ananda R. Jayaweera, Jian Ping Bin, Sanjiv Kaul, Jonathan Lindner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether acoustic disruption of microbubbles in the left ventricular (LV) cavity prior to entry in the coronary circulation or their gradual destruction in the myocardium during myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) affects quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion. Methods: MCE was performed in 12 open chest dogs with both intermittent high-power imaging (IHPI) and real-time low-power imaging (RLPI). To assess the affects of microbubble destruction in the LV cavity, MCE parameters of myocardial perfusion were compared for imaging planes that included versus avoided the LV cavity. To assess the effects of gradual disruption of microbubbles in the microcirculation during RLPI, MCE parameters from frames acquired continuously were compared to that from acquiring only end-systolic frames. Results: Destruction of microbubbles in the LV cavity did not alter perfusion data for either form of imaging unless RLPI was performed using long (6-frame) destructive pulse sequences. With RLPI, a gradual decay in microbubble signal occurred during their myocardial transit, the degree of which was related to the acoustic power. Signal decay during microbubble transit resulted in an overestimation of the microvascular blood velocity (β-value) and an underestimation of the microvascular blood volume (A-value). Conclusions: MCE parameters of perfusion at low power can be significantly altered by microbubble destruction in the LV cavity and in the myocardial microcirculation during RLPI. Short microbubble destruction pulse sequences and imaging only at end-systole can reduce these effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)503-509
Number of pages7
JournalEchocardiography
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Microbubbles
Perfusion
Echocardiography
Microcirculation
Acoustics
Coronary Circulation
Systole
Blood Volume
Myocardium
Thorax
Dogs

Keywords

  • Microbubbles
  • Myocardial contrast echocardiography
  • Perfusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Effect of microbubble exposure to ultrasound on quantitation of myocardial perfusion. / Leong-Poi, Howard; Swales, James; Jayaweera, Ananda R.; Bin, Jian Ping; Kaul, Sanjiv; Lindner, Jonathan.

In: Echocardiography, Vol. 22, No. 6, 07.2005, p. 503-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leong-Poi, Howard ; Swales, James ; Jayaweera, Ananda R. ; Bin, Jian Ping ; Kaul, Sanjiv ; Lindner, Jonathan. / Effect of microbubble exposure to ultrasound on quantitation of myocardial perfusion. In: Echocardiography. 2005 ; Vol. 22, No. 6. pp. 503-509.
@article{ed867d5feb7546b6bf6deae029816940,
title = "Effect of microbubble exposure to ultrasound on quantitation of myocardial perfusion",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether acoustic disruption of microbubbles in the left ventricular (LV) cavity prior to entry in the coronary circulation or their gradual destruction in the myocardium during myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) affects quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion. Methods: MCE was performed in 12 open chest dogs with both intermittent high-power imaging (IHPI) and real-time low-power imaging (RLPI). To assess the affects of microbubble destruction in the LV cavity, MCE parameters of myocardial perfusion were compared for imaging planes that included versus avoided the LV cavity. To assess the effects of gradual disruption of microbubbles in the microcirculation during RLPI, MCE parameters from frames acquired continuously were compared to that from acquiring only end-systolic frames. Results: Destruction of microbubbles in the LV cavity did not alter perfusion data for either form of imaging unless RLPI was performed using long (6-frame) destructive pulse sequences. With RLPI, a gradual decay in microbubble signal occurred during their myocardial transit, the degree of which was related to the acoustic power. Signal decay during microbubble transit resulted in an overestimation of the microvascular blood velocity (β-value) and an underestimation of the microvascular blood volume (A-value). Conclusions: MCE parameters of perfusion at low power can be significantly altered by microbubble destruction in the LV cavity and in the myocardial microcirculation during RLPI. Short microbubble destruction pulse sequences and imaging only at end-systole can reduce these effects.",
keywords = "Microbubbles, Myocardial contrast echocardiography, Perfusion",
author = "Howard Leong-Poi and James Swales and Jayaweera, {Ananda R.} and Bin, {Jian Ping} and Sanjiv Kaul and Jonathan Lindner",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8175.2005.40001.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "503--509",
journal = "Echocardiography",
issn = "0742-2822",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of microbubble exposure to ultrasound on quantitation of myocardial perfusion

AU - Leong-Poi, Howard

AU - Swales, James

AU - Jayaweera, Ananda R.

AU - Bin, Jian Ping

AU - Kaul, Sanjiv

AU - Lindner, Jonathan

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether acoustic disruption of microbubbles in the left ventricular (LV) cavity prior to entry in the coronary circulation or their gradual destruction in the myocardium during myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) affects quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion. Methods: MCE was performed in 12 open chest dogs with both intermittent high-power imaging (IHPI) and real-time low-power imaging (RLPI). To assess the affects of microbubble destruction in the LV cavity, MCE parameters of myocardial perfusion were compared for imaging planes that included versus avoided the LV cavity. To assess the effects of gradual disruption of microbubbles in the microcirculation during RLPI, MCE parameters from frames acquired continuously were compared to that from acquiring only end-systolic frames. Results: Destruction of microbubbles in the LV cavity did not alter perfusion data for either form of imaging unless RLPI was performed using long (6-frame) destructive pulse sequences. With RLPI, a gradual decay in microbubble signal occurred during their myocardial transit, the degree of which was related to the acoustic power. Signal decay during microbubble transit resulted in an overestimation of the microvascular blood velocity (β-value) and an underestimation of the microvascular blood volume (A-value). Conclusions: MCE parameters of perfusion at low power can be significantly altered by microbubble destruction in the LV cavity and in the myocardial microcirculation during RLPI. Short microbubble destruction pulse sequences and imaging only at end-systole can reduce these effects.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether acoustic disruption of microbubbles in the left ventricular (LV) cavity prior to entry in the coronary circulation or their gradual destruction in the myocardium during myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) affects quantitative parameters of myocardial perfusion. Methods: MCE was performed in 12 open chest dogs with both intermittent high-power imaging (IHPI) and real-time low-power imaging (RLPI). To assess the affects of microbubble destruction in the LV cavity, MCE parameters of myocardial perfusion were compared for imaging planes that included versus avoided the LV cavity. To assess the effects of gradual disruption of microbubbles in the microcirculation during RLPI, MCE parameters from frames acquired continuously were compared to that from acquiring only end-systolic frames. Results: Destruction of microbubbles in the LV cavity did not alter perfusion data for either form of imaging unless RLPI was performed using long (6-frame) destructive pulse sequences. With RLPI, a gradual decay in microbubble signal occurred during their myocardial transit, the degree of which was related to the acoustic power. Signal decay during microbubble transit resulted in an overestimation of the microvascular blood velocity (β-value) and an underestimation of the microvascular blood volume (A-value). Conclusions: MCE parameters of perfusion at low power can be significantly altered by microbubble destruction in the LV cavity and in the myocardial microcirculation during RLPI. Short microbubble destruction pulse sequences and imaging only at end-systole can reduce these effects.

KW - Microbubbles

KW - Myocardial contrast echocardiography

KW - Perfusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21644467927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21644467927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2005.40001.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2005.40001.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15966935

AN - SCOPUS:21644467927

VL - 22

SP - 503

EP - 509

JO - Echocardiography

JF - Echocardiography

SN - 0742-2822

IS - 6

ER -