Effect of impact factor and discipline on journal data sharing policies

David B. Resnik, Melissa Morales, Rachel Landrum, Min Shi, Jessica Minnier, Nicole A. Vasilevsky, Robin E. Champieux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Data sharing is crucial to the advancement of science because it facilitates collaboration, transparency, reproducibility, criticism, and re-analysis. Publishers are well-positioned to promote sharing of research data by implementing data sharing policies. While there is an increasing trend toward requiring data sharing, not all journals mandate that data be shared at the time of publication. In this study, we extended previous work to analyze the data sharing policies of 447 journals across several scientific disciplines, including biology, clinical sciences, mathematics, physics, and social sciences. Our results showed that only a small percentage of journals require data sharing as a condition of publication, and that this varies across disciplines and Impact Factors. Both Impact Factors and discipline are associated with the presence of a data sharing policy. Our results suggest that journals with higher Impact Factors are more likely to have data sharing policies; use shared data in peer review; require deposit of specific data types into publicly available data banks; and refer to reproducibility as a rationale for sharing data. Biological science journals are more likely than social science and mathematics journals to require data sharing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAccountability in Research
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

social science
science
mathematics
data bank
scientific discipline
peer review
transparency
physics
biology
criticism
trend
time

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • data management
  • publication ethics
  • reproducibility
  • research ethics
  • research integrity
  • responsible conduct of research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Effect of impact factor and discipline on journal data sharing policies. / Resnik, David B.; Morales, Melissa; Landrum, Rachel; Shi, Min; Minnier, Jessica; Vasilevsky, Nicole A.; Champieux, Robin E.

In: Accountability in Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Resnik, David B. ; Morales, Melissa ; Landrum, Rachel ; Shi, Min ; Minnier, Jessica ; Vasilevsky, Nicole A. ; Champieux, Robin E. / Effect of impact factor and discipline on journal data sharing policies. In: Accountability in Research. 2019.
@article{7ba350e58f06473994ccb756ba2a9bdc,
title = "Effect of impact factor and discipline on journal data sharing policies",
abstract = "Data sharing is crucial to the advancement of science because it facilitates collaboration, transparency, reproducibility, criticism, and re-analysis. Publishers are well-positioned to promote sharing of research data by implementing data sharing policies. While there is an increasing trend toward requiring data sharing, not all journals mandate that data be shared at the time of publication. In this study, we extended previous work to analyze the data sharing policies of 447 journals across several scientific disciplines, including biology, clinical sciences, mathematics, physics, and social sciences. Our results showed that only a small percentage of journals require data sharing as a condition of publication, and that this varies across disciplines and Impact Factors. Both Impact Factors and discipline are associated with the presence of a data sharing policy. Our results suggest that journals with higher Impact Factors are more likely to have data sharing policies; use shared data in peer review; require deposit of specific data types into publicly available data banks; and refer to reproducibility as a rationale for sharing data. Biological science journals are more likely than social science and mathematics journals to require data sharing.",
keywords = "Collaboration, data management, publication ethics, reproducibility, research ethics, research integrity, responsible conduct of research",
author = "Resnik, {David B.} and Melissa Morales and Rachel Landrum and Min Shi and Jessica Minnier and Vasilevsky, {Nicole A.} and Champieux, {Robin E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08989621.2019.1591277",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Accountability in Research",
issn = "0898-9621",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of impact factor and discipline on journal data sharing policies

AU - Resnik, David B.

AU - Morales, Melissa

AU - Landrum, Rachel

AU - Shi, Min

AU - Minnier, Jessica

AU - Vasilevsky, Nicole A.

AU - Champieux, Robin E.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Data sharing is crucial to the advancement of science because it facilitates collaboration, transparency, reproducibility, criticism, and re-analysis. Publishers are well-positioned to promote sharing of research data by implementing data sharing policies. While there is an increasing trend toward requiring data sharing, not all journals mandate that data be shared at the time of publication. In this study, we extended previous work to analyze the data sharing policies of 447 journals across several scientific disciplines, including biology, clinical sciences, mathematics, physics, and social sciences. Our results showed that only a small percentage of journals require data sharing as a condition of publication, and that this varies across disciplines and Impact Factors. Both Impact Factors and discipline are associated with the presence of a data sharing policy. Our results suggest that journals with higher Impact Factors are more likely to have data sharing policies; use shared data in peer review; require deposit of specific data types into publicly available data banks; and refer to reproducibility as a rationale for sharing data. Biological science journals are more likely than social science and mathematics journals to require data sharing.

AB - Data sharing is crucial to the advancement of science because it facilitates collaboration, transparency, reproducibility, criticism, and re-analysis. Publishers are well-positioned to promote sharing of research data by implementing data sharing policies. While there is an increasing trend toward requiring data sharing, not all journals mandate that data be shared at the time of publication. In this study, we extended previous work to analyze the data sharing policies of 447 journals across several scientific disciplines, including biology, clinical sciences, mathematics, physics, and social sciences. Our results showed that only a small percentage of journals require data sharing as a condition of publication, and that this varies across disciplines and Impact Factors. Both Impact Factors and discipline are associated with the presence of a data sharing policy. Our results suggest that journals with higher Impact Factors are more likely to have data sharing policies; use shared data in peer review; require deposit of specific data types into publicly available data banks; and refer to reproducibility as a rationale for sharing data. Biological science journals are more likely than social science and mathematics journals to require data sharing.

KW - Collaboration

KW - data management

KW - publication ethics

KW - reproducibility

KW - research ethics

KW - research integrity

KW - responsible conduct of research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063401897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063401897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2019.1591277

DO - 10.1080/08989621.2019.1591277

M3 - Article

JO - Accountability in Research

JF - Accountability in Research

SN - 0898-9621

ER -