Drug contamination from opening glass ampules

A. N. Zacher, Mark Zornow, G. Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently there have been several reports of postoperative sepsis due to the intravenous injection of contaminated solutions of propofol (Diprivan). The mechanism by which this contamination occurred has not been identified. This study sought to determine whether bacterial contamination of the contents of glass ampules can be decreased by swabbing the neck of the vial with alcohol prior to opening. Glass ampules of 1% propofol and 1% lidocaine were swabbed with a solution of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Half of these ampules were subsequently wiped with alcohol pads prior to being opened. An aliquot from each ampule was pipetted into a nutrient broth and allowed to incubate overnight at 37° C. These solutions were plated on agar, incubated for 24 h, and then examined for bacterial growth. Three of the eight lidocaine ampules and six of the eight propofol ampules not cleaned with alcohol demonstrated evidence of bacterial contamination. The contents of all ampules that had been wiped with alcohol prior to being opened remained sterile (P <0.001 vs. non-alcohol-treated group for propofol ampules and P = 0.20 vs. non-alcohol-treated group for lidocaine ampules). These data suggest that bacterial contamination of propofol and lidocaine may occur as a result of opening glass ampules. Wiping the outside of the ampule with alcohol immediately prior to opening may decrease this risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)893-895
Number of pages3
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume75
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Drug Contamination
Propofol
Glass
Lidocaine
Alcohols
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Intravenous Injections
Agar
Sepsis
Neck
Food
Growth

Keywords

  • Anesthetics, intravenous: propofol
  • Complications; bacterial contamination
  • Equipment: ampules

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Zacher, A. N., Zornow, M., & Evans, G. (1991). Drug contamination from opening glass ampules. Anesthesiology, 75(5), 893-895.

Drug contamination from opening glass ampules. / Zacher, A. N.; Zornow, Mark; Evans, G.

In: Anesthesiology, Vol. 75, No. 5, 1991, p. 893-895.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zacher, AN, Zornow, M & Evans, G 1991, 'Drug contamination from opening glass ampules', Anesthesiology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 893-895.
Zacher, A. N. ; Zornow, Mark ; Evans, G. / Drug contamination from opening glass ampules. In: Anesthesiology. 1991 ; Vol. 75, No. 5. pp. 893-895.
@article{cf6fa7d0a31a4e80a90fd257f2003c8f,
title = "Drug contamination from opening glass ampules",
abstract = "Recently there have been several reports of postoperative sepsis due to the intravenous injection of contaminated solutions of propofol (Diprivan). The mechanism by which this contamination occurred has not been identified. This study sought to determine whether bacterial contamination of the contents of glass ampules can be decreased by swabbing the neck of the vial with alcohol prior to opening. Glass ampules of 1{\%} propofol and 1{\%} lidocaine were swabbed with a solution of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Half of these ampules were subsequently wiped with alcohol pads prior to being opened. An aliquot from each ampule was pipetted into a nutrient broth and allowed to incubate overnight at 37° C. These solutions were plated on agar, incubated for 24 h, and then examined for bacterial growth. Three of the eight lidocaine ampules and six of the eight propofol ampules not cleaned with alcohol demonstrated evidence of bacterial contamination. The contents of all ampules that had been wiped with alcohol prior to being opened remained sterile (P <0.001 vs. non-alcohol-treated group for propofol ampules and P = 0.20 vs. non-alcohol-treated group for lidocaine ampules). These data suggest that bacterial contamination of propofol and lidocaine may occur as a result of opening glass ampules. Wiping the outside of the ampule with alcohol immediately prior to opening may decrease this risk.",
keywords = "Anesthetics, intravenous: propofol, Complications; bacterial contamination, Equipment: ampules",
author = "Zacher, {A. N.} and Mark Zornow and G. Evans",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "893--895",
journal = "Anesthesiology",
issn = "0003-3022",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drug contamination from opening glass ampules

AU - Zacher, A. N.

AU - Zornow, Mark

AU - Evans, G.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Recently there have been several reports of postoperative sepsis due to the intravenous injection of contaminated solutions of propofol (Diprivan). The mechanism by which this contamination occurred has not been identified. This study sought to determine whether bacterial contamination of the contents of glass ampules can be decreased by swabbing the neck of the vial with alcohol prior to opening. Glass ampules of 1% propofol and 1% lidocaine were swabbed with a solution of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Half of these ampules were subsequently wiped with alcohol pads prior to being opened. An aliquot from each ampule was pipetted into a nutrient broth and allowed to incubate overnight at 37° C. These solutions were plated on agar, incubated for 24 h, and then examined for bacterial growth. Three of the eight lidocaine ampules and six of the eight propofol ampules not cleaned with alcohol demonstrated evidence of bacterial contamination. The contents of all ampules that had been wiped with alcohol prior to being opened remained sterile (P <0.001 vs. non-alcohol-treated group for propofol ampules and P = 0.20 vs. non-alcohol-treated group for lidocaine ampules). These data suggest that bacterial contamination of propofol and lidocaine may occur as a result of opening glass ampules. Wiping the outside of the ampule with alcohol immediately prior to opening may decrease this risk.

AB - Recently there have been several reports of postoperative sepsis due to the intravenous injection of contaminated solutions of propofol (Diprivan). The mechanism by which this contamination occurred has not been identified. This study sought to determine whether bacterial contamination of the contents of glass ampules can be decreased by swabbing the neck of the vial with alcohol prior to opening. Glass ampules of 1% propofol and 1% lidocaine were swabbed with a solution of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Half of these ampules were subsequently wiped with alcohol pads prior to being opened. An aliquot from each ampule was pipetted into a nutrient broth and allowed to incubate overnight at 37° C. These solutions were plated on agar, incubated for 24 h, and then examined for bacterial growth. Three of the eight lidocaine ampules and six of the eight propofol ampules not cleaned with alcohol demonstrated evidence of bacterial contamination. The contents of all ampules that had been wiped with alcohol prior to being opened remained sterile (P <0.001 vs. non-alcohol-treated group for propofol ampules and P = 0.20 vs. non-alcohol-treated group for lidocaine ampules). These data suggest that bacterial contamination of propofol and lidocaine may occur as a result of opening glass ampules. Wiping the outside of the ampule with alcohol immediately prior to opening may decrease this risk.

KW - Anesthetics, intravenous: propofol

KW - Complications; bacterial contamination

KW - Equipment: ampules

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025988122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025988122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1952213

AN - SCOPUS:0025988122

VL - 75

SP - 893

EP - 895

JO - Anesthesiology

JF - Anesthesiology

SN - 0003-3022

IS - 5

ER -