Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN

Sue Flocke, A. John Orzano, H. Andrew Selinger, James J. Werner, Laurie Vorel, Paul A. Nutting, Kurt C. Stange

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND. The competitive managed care marketplace is causing increased restrictiveness in the structure of health plans. The effect of plan restrictiveness on the delivery of primary care is unknown. Our purpose was to examine the association of the organizational and financial restrictiveness of managed care plans with important elements of primary care, the patient-clinician relationship, and patient satisfaction. METHODS. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 15 member practices of the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network selected to represent diverse health care markets. Each practice completed a Managed Care Survey to characterize the degree of organizational and financial restrictiveness for each individual health care plan. A total of 199 managed care plans were characterized. Then, 1475 consecutive outpatients completed a patient survey that included: the Components of Primary Care Instrument as a measure of attributes of primary care; a measure of the amount of inconvenience involved with using the health care plan; and the Medical Outcomes Study Visit Rating Form for assessing patient satisfaction. RESULTS. Clinicians' reports of inconvenience were significantly associated (P <.001) with the financial and organizational restrictiveness scores of the plan. There was no association between plan restrictiveness and patient report of multiple aspects of the delivery of primary care or patient satisfaction with the visit. CONCLUSIONS. Plan restrictiveness is associated with greater perceived hassle for clinicians but not for patients. Plan restrictiveness seems to be creating great pressures for clinicians, but is not affecting patients' reports of the quality of important attributes of primary care or satisfaction with the visit. Physicians and their staffs appear to be buffering patients from the potentially negative effects of plan restrictiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)762-768
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Family Practice
Volume48
Issue number10
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Managed Care Programs
Primary Health Care
Patient Satisfaction
Delivery of Health Care
Health Care Sector
Outpatients
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Physicians
Pressure
Health

Keywords

  • Family practice
  • Managed care programs
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Physicians' role
  • Practice management
  • Primary health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Flocke, S., Orzano, A. J., Selinger, H. A., Werner, J. J., Vorel, L., Nutting, P. A., & Stange, K. C. (1999). Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN. Journal of Family Practice, 48(10), 762-768.

Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN. / Flocke, Sue; Orzano, A. John; Selinger, H. Andrew; Werner, James J.; Vorel, Laurie; Nutting, Paul A.; Stange, Kurt C.

In: Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 48, No. 10, 01.12.1999, p. 762-768.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flocke, S, Orzano, AJ, Selinger, HA, Werner, JJ, Vorel, L, Nutting, PA & Stange, KC 1999, 'Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN', Journal of Family Practice, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 762-768.
Flocke S, Orzano AJ, Selinger HA, Werner JJ, Vorel L, Nutting PA et al. Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN. Journal of Family Practice. 1999 Dec 1;48(10):762-768.
Flocke, Sue ; Orzano, A. John ; Selinger, H. Andrew ; Werner, James J. ; Vorel, Laurie ; Nutting, Paul A. ; Stange, Kurt C. / Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN. In: Journal of Family Practice. 1999 ; Vol. 48, No. 10. pp. 762-768.
@article{5d9606acd8b54b6ca549732035afc5ee,
title = "Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN",
abstract = "BACKGROUND. The competitive managed care marketplace is causing increased restrictiveness in the structure of health plans. The effect of plan restrictiveness on the delivery of primary care is unknown. Our purpose was to examine the association of the organizational and financial restrictiveness of managed care plans with important elements of primary care, the patient-clinician relationship, and patient satisfaction. METHODS. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 15 member practices of the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network selected to represent diverse health care markets. Each practice completed a Managed Care Survey to characterize the degree of organizational and financial restrictiveness for each individual health care plan. A total of 199 managed care plans were characterized. Then, 1475 consecutive outpatients completed a patient survey that included: the Components of Primary Care Instrument as a measure of attributes of primary care; a measure of the amount of inconvenience involved with using the health care plan; and the Medical Outcomes Study Visit Rating Form for assessing patient satisfaction. RESULTS. Clinicians' reports of inconvenience were significantly associated (P <.001) with the financial and organizational restrictiveness scores of the plan. There was no association between plan restrictiveness and patient report of multiple aspects of the delivery of primary care or patient satisfaction with the visit. CONCLUSIONS. Plan restrictiveness is associated with greater perceived hassle for clinicians but not for patients. Plan restrictiveness seems to be creating great pressures for clinicians, but is not affecting patients' reports of the quality of important attributes of primary care or satisfaction with the visit. Physicians and their staffs appear to be buffering patients from the potentially negative effects of plan restrictiveness.",
keywords = "Family practice, Managed care programs, Patient satisfaction, Physicians' role, Practice management, Primary health care",
author = "Sue Flocke and Orzano, {A. John} and Selinger, {H. Andrew} and Werner, {James J.} and Laurie Vorel and Nutting, {Paul A.} and Stange, {Kurt C.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "762--768",
journal = "Journal of Family Practice",
issn = "0094-3509",
publisher = "Appleton-Century-Crofts",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN

AU - Flocke, Sue

AU - Orzano, A. John

AU - Selinger, H. Andrew

AU - Werner, James J.

AU - Vorel, Laurie

AU - Nutting, Paul A.

AU - Stange, Kurt C.

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND. The competitive managed care marketplace is causing increased restrictiveness in the structure of health plans. The effect of plan restrictiveness on the delivery of primary care is unknown. Our purpose was to examine the association of the organizational and financial restrictiveness of managed care plans with important elements of primary care, the patient-clinician relationship, and patient satisfaction. METHODS. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 15 member practices of the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network selected to represent diverse health care markets. Each practice completed a Managed Care Survey to characterize the degree of organizational and financial restrictiveness for each individual health care plan. A total of 199 managed care plans were characterized. Then, 1475 consecutive outpatients completed a patient survey that included: the Components of Primary Care Instrument as a measure of attributes of primary care; a measure of the amount of inconvenience involved with using the health care plan; and the Medical Outcomes Study Visit Rating Form for assessing patient satisfaction. RESULTS. Clinicians' reports of inconvenience were significantly associated (P <.001) with the financial and organizational restrictiveness scores of the plan. There was no association between plan restrictiveness and patient report of multiple aspects of the delivery of primary care or patient satisfaction with the visit. CONCLUSIONS. Plan restrictiveness is associated with greater perceived hassle for clinicians but not for patients. Plan restrictiveness seems to be creating great pressures for clinicians, but is not affecting patients' reports of the quality of important attributes of primary care or satisfaction with the visit. Physicians and their staffs appear to be buffering patients from the potentially negative effects of plan restrictiveness.

AB - BACKGROUND. The competitive managed care marketplace is causing increased restrictiveness in the structure of health plans. The effect of plan restrictiveness on the delivery of primary care is unknown. Our purpose was to examine the association of the organizational and financial restrictiveness of managed care plans with important elements of primary care, the patient-clinician relationship, and patient satisfaction. METHODS. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 15 member practices of the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network selected to represent diverse health care markets. Each practice completed a Managed Care Survey to characterize the degree of organizational and financial restrictiveness for each individual health care plan. A total of 199 managed care plans were characterized. Then, 1475 consecutive outpatients completed a patient survey that included: the Components of Primary Care Instrument as a measure of attributes of primary care; a measure of the amount of inconvenience involved with using the health care plan; and the Medical Outcomes Study Visit Rating Form for assessing patient satisfaction. RESULTS. Clinicians' reports of inconvenience were significantly associated (P <.001) with the financial and organizational restrictiveness scores of the plan. There was no association between plan restrictiveness and patient report of multiple aspects of the delivery of primary care or patient satisfaction with the visit. CONCLUSIONS. Plan restrictiveness is associated with greater perceived hassle for clinicians but not for patients. Plan restrictiveness seems to be creating great pressures for clinicians, but is not affecting patients' reports of the quality of important attributes of primary care or satisfaction with the visit. Physicians and their staffs appear to be buffering patients from the potentially negative effects of plan restrictiveness.

KW - Family practice

KW - Managed care programs

KW - Patient satisfaction

KW - Physicians' role

KW - Practice management

KW - Primary health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033203719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033203719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12224673

AN - SCOPUS:0033203719

VL - 48

SP - 762

EP - 768

JO - Journal of Family Practice

JF - Journal of Family Practice

SN - 0094-3509

IS - 10

ER -