Distress and patient-centered communication among veterans with incidental (not screen-detected) pulmonary nodules

A cohort study

Christopher G. Slatore, Sara E. Golden, Linda Ganzini, Renda Soylemez Wiener, David H. Au

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Incidental pulmonary nodule detection is postulated to cause distress, but the frequency and magnitude of that distress have not been reported. The quality of patient-clinician communication and the perceived risk of lung cancer may influence distress Objectives: To evaluate the association of communication processes with distress and the perceived risk of lung cancer using validated instruments. Methods: Weconducted a prospective cohort study of patients with incidentally detected nodules who received care at one Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We measured distress with the Impact of Event Scale and patient-centered communication with the Consultation Care Measure, both validated instruments. Risk of lung cancer was self-reported by participants. We used multivariable adjusted logistic regression to measure the association of communication quality with distress. Measurements and Main Results: Among 122 Veterans with incidental nodules, 23%, 12%, and 4%reported experiencingmild, moderate, and severe distress, respectively, at the time they were informed of the pulmonary nodule. Participant-reported risk of lung cancer was not associated with distress. In the adjusted model, high-quality communication was associated with decreased distress (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-1.00, P = 0.05). Among participants who reported a risk of malignancy of 30% or less, high-quality communication was associated with decreased distress (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02-0.92, P = 0.04), but was not associated with distress for those who reported a risk greater than 30% (OR = 0.12 (95% CI = 0.00-3.97, P = 0.24), although the P value for interaction was not significant. Conclusions: Veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules frequently reported inadequate information exchange regarding their nodule. Many patients experience distress after they are informed that they have a pulmonary nodule, and high-quality patient-clinician communication is associated with decreased distress. Communication strategies that only target improved knowledge of the risk of malignancy may not be sufficient to reduce the distress associated with nodule detection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-192
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Veterans
Cohort Studies
Communication
Lung
Lung Neoplasms
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Neoplasms
Referral and Consultation
Logistic Models
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Patient-centered outcomes
  • Patient-clinician communication
  • Pulmonary nodule

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Distress and patient-centered communication among veterans with incidental (not screen-detected) pulmonary nodules : A cohort study. / Slatore, Christopher G.; Golden, Sara E.; Ganzini, Linda; Wiener, Renda Soylemez; Au, David H.

In: Annals of the American Thoracic Society, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 184-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e412050661244c469954f1c6cc24f74d,
title = "Distress and patient-centered communication among veterans with incidental (not screen-detected) pulmonary nodules: A cohort study",
abstract = "Rationale: Incidental pulmonary nodule detection is postulated to cause distress, but the frequency and magnitude of that distress have not been reported. The quality of patient-clinician communication and the perceived risk of lung cancer may influence distress Objectives: To evaluate the association of communication processes with distress and the perceived risk of lung cancer using validated instruments. Methods: Weconducted a prospective cohort study of patients with incidentally detected nodules who received care at one Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We measured distress with the Impact of Event Scale and patient-centered communication with the Consultation Care Measure, both validated instruments. Risk of lung cancer was self-reported by participants. We used multivariable adjusted logistic regression to measure the association of communication quality with distress. Measurements and Main Results: Among 122 Veterans with incidental nodules, 23{\%}, 12{\%}, and 4{\%}reported experiencingmild, moderate, and severe distress, respectively, at the time they were informed of the pulmonary nodule. Participant-reported risk of lung cancer was not associated with distress. In the adjusted model, high-quality communication was associated with decreased distress (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-1.00, P = 0.05). Among participants who reported a risk of malignancy of 30{\%} or less, high-quality communication was associated with decreased distress (OR = 0.15, 95{\%} CI = 0.02-0.92, P = 0.04), but was not associated with distress for those who reported a risk greater than 30{\%} (OR = 0.12 (95{\%} CI = 0.00-3.97, P = 0.24), although the P value for interaction was not significant. Conclusions: Veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules frequently reported inadequate information exchange regarding their nodule. Many patients experience distress after they are informed that they have a pulmonary nodule, and high-quality patient-clinician communication is associated with decreased distress. Communication strategies that only target improved knowledge of the risk of malignancy may not be sufficient to reduce the distress associated with nodule detection.",
keywords = "Patient-centered outcomes, Patient-clinician communication, Pulmonary nodule",
author = "Slatore, {Christopher G.} and Golden, {Sara E.} and Linda Ganzini and Wiener, {Renda Soylemez} and Au, {David H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1513/AnnalsATS.201406-283OC",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "184--192",
journal = "Annals of the American Thoracic Society",
issn = "2325-6621",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distress and patient-centered communication among veterans with incidental (not screen-detected) pulmonary nodules

T2 - A cohort study

AU - Slatore, Christopher G.

AU - Golden, Sara E.

AU - Ganzini, Linda

AU - Wiener, Renda Soylemez

AU - Au, David H.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Rationale: Incidental pulmonary nodule detection is postulated to cause distress, but the frequency and magnitude of that distress have not been reported. The quality of patient-clinician communication and the perceived risk of lung cancer may influence distress Objectives: To evaluate the association of communication processes with distress and the perceived risk of lung cancer using validated instruments. Methods: Weconducted a prospective cohort study of patients with incidentally detected nodules who received care at one Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We measured distress with the Impact of Event Scale and patient-centered communication with the Consultation Care Measure, both validated instruments. Risk of lung cancer was self-reported by participants. We used multivariable adjusted logistic regression to measure the association of communication quality with distress. Measurements and Main Results: Among 122 Veterans with incidental nodules, 23%, 12%, and 4%reported experiencingmild, moderate, and severe distress, respectively, at the time they were informed of the pulmonary nodule. Participant-reported risk of lung cancer was not associated with distress. In the adjusted model, high-quality communication was associated with decreased distress (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-1.00, P = 0.05). Among participants who reported a risk of malignancy of 30% or less, high-quality communication was associated with decreased distress (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02-0.92, P = 0.04), but was not associated with distress for those who reported a risk greater than 30% (OR = 0.12 (95% CI = 0.00-3.97, P = 0.24), although the P value for interaction was not significant. Conclusions: Veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules frequently reported inadequate information exchange regarding their nodule. Many patients experience distress after they are informed that they have a pulmonary nodule, and high-quality patient-clinician communication is associated with decreased distress. Communication strategies that only target improved knowledge of the risk of malignancy may not be sufficient to reduce the distress associated with nodule detection.

AB - Rationale: Incidental pulmonary nodule detection is postulated to cause distress, but the frequency and magnitude of that distress have not been reported. The quality of patient-clinician communication and the perceived risk of lung cancer may influence distress Objectives: To evaluate the association of communication processes with distress and the perceived risk of lung cancer using validated instruments. Methods: Weconducted a prospective cohort study of patients with incidentally detected nodules who received care at one Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. We measured distress with the Impact of Event Scale and patient-centered communication with the Consultation Care Measure, both validated instruments. Risk of lung cancer was self-reported by participants. We used multivariable adjusted logistic regression to measure the association of communication quality with distress. Measurements and Main Results: Among 122 Veterans with incidental nodules, 23%, 12%, and 4%reported experiencingmild, moderate, and severe distress, respectively, at the time they were informed of the pulmonary nodule. Participant-reported risk of lung cancer was not associated with distress. In the adjusted model, high-quality communication was associated with decreased distress (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-1.00, P = 0.05). Among participants who reported a risk of malignancy of 30% or less, high-quality communication was associated with decreased distress (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02-0.92, P = 0.04), but was not associated with distress for those who reported a risk greater than 30% (OR = 0.12 (95% CI = 0.00-3.97, P = 0.24), although the P value for interaction was not significant. Conclusions: Veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules frequently reported inadequate information exchange regarding their nodule. Many patients experience distress after they are informed that they have a pulmonary nodule, and high-quality patient-clinician communication is associated with decreased distress. Communication strategies that only target improved knowledge of the risk of malignancy may not be sufficient to reduce the distress associated with nodule detection.

KW - Patient-centered outcomes

KW - Patient-clinician communication

KW - Pulmonary nodule

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926455903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926455903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201406-283OC

DO - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201406-283OC

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 184

EP - 192

JO - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

JF - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

SN - 2325-6621

IS - 2

ER -