Distinguishing between contact lens warpage and ectasia: Usefulness of optical coherence tomography epithelial thickness mapping

Julie M. Schallhorn, Maolong Tang, Yan Li, Derek J. Louie, Winston Chamberlain, David Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To distinguish between corneal ectasia and contact lens–related warpage by characteristic patterns on corneal topography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) epithelial thickness maps. Setting Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA. Design Prospective and retrospective case series. Methods Axial and mean power maps were obtained on corneal topography systems. Epithelial thickness maps were generated using RTVue OCT. A sector divider was applied to all maps. The locations of the minimum epithelial thickness, maximum epithelial thickness, maximum axial power, and maximum mean power were determined based on sector averages. Agreement was defined as the extremums occurring in the same or adjacent sectors. Results Twenty-one eyes with keratoconus, 6 eyes with forme fruste keratoconus (better eye of asymmetric keratoconus), and 15 eyes with contact lens–related warpage were identified. The keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus eyes had coincident topographic steepening with epithelial thinning. The locations of minimum epithelial thickness and maximum axial power agreed in 90% of the keratoconic eyes, while the minimum epithelial thickness and maximum mean power agreed in 95% of them. Conversely, the warpage eyes had coincident topographic steepening with epithelial thickening and normal pachymetry maps. The locations of maximum epithelial thickness and maximum axial power agreed in 93% of the warpage eyes, while the maximum epithelial thickness and maximum mean power agreed in all warpage eyes. Conclusion Results show that epithelial thickness maps and corneal topographic maps are powerful synergistic tools in evaluating eyes with abnormal topography and can help differentiate between keratoconus and nonectatic conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-66
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pathologic Dilatations
Contact Lenses
Optical Coherence Tomography
Keratoconus
Corneal Topography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

@article{1872335fbe21429b96844c664513335c,
title = "Distinguishing between contact lens warpage and ectasia: Usefulness of optical coherence tomography epithelial thickness mapping",
abstract = "Purpose To distinguish between corneal ectasia and contact lens–related warpage by characteristic patterns on corneal topography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) epithelial thickness maps. Setting Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA. Design Prospective and retrospective case series. Methods Axial and mean power maps were obtained on corneal topography systems. Epithelial thickness maps were generated using RTVue OCT. A sector divider was applied to all maps. The locations of the minimum epithelial thickness, maximum epithelial thickness, maximum axial power, and maximum mean power were determined based on sector averages. Agreement was defined as the extremums occurring in the same or adjacent sectors. Results Twenty-one eyes with keratoconus, 6 eyes with forme fruste keratoconus (better eye of asymmetric keratoconus), and 15 eyes with contact lens–related warpage were identified. The keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus eyes had coincident topographic steepening with epithelial thinning. The locations of minimum epithelial thickness and maximum axial power agreed in 90{\%} of the keratoconic eyes, while the minimum epithelial thickness and maximum mean power agreed in 95{\%} of them. Conversely, the warpage eyes had coincident topographic steepening with epithelial thickening and normal pachymetry maps. The locations of maximum epithelial thickness and maximum axial power agreed in 93{\%} of the warpage eyes, while the maximum epithelial thickness and maximum mean power agreed in all warpage eyes. Conclusion Results show that epithelial thickness maps and corneal topographic maps are powerful synergistic tools in evaluating eyes with abnormal topography and can help differentiate between keratoconus and nonectatic conditions.",
author = "Schallhorn, {Julie M.} and Maolong Tang and Yan Li and Louie, {Derek J.} and Winston Chamberlain and David Huang",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "60--66",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinguishing between contact lens warpage and ectasia

T2 - Usefulness of optical coherence tomography epithelial thickness mapping

AU - Schallhorn, Julie M.

AU - Tang, Maolong

AU - Li, Yan

AU - Louie, Derek J.

AU - Chamberlain, Winston

AU - Huang, David

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose To distinguish between corneal ectasia and contact lens–related warpage by characteristic patterns on corneal topography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) epithelial thickness maps. Setting Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA. Design Prospective and retrospective case series. Methods Axial and mean power maps were obtained on corneal topography systems. Epithelial thickness maps were generated using RTVue OCT. A sector divider was applied to all maps. The locations of the minimum epithelial thickness, maximum epithelial thickness, maximum axial power, and maximum mean power were determined based on sector averages. Agreement was defined as the extremums occurring in the same or adjacent sectors. Results Twenty-one eyes with keratoconus, 6 eyes with forme fruste keratoconus (better eye of asymmetric keratoconus), and 15 eyes with contact lens–related warpage were identified. The keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus eyes had coincident topographic steepening with epithelial thinning. The locations of minimum epithelial thickness and maximum axial power agreed in 90% of the keratoconic eyes, while the minimum epithelial thickness and maximum mean power agreed in 95% of them. Conversely, the warpage eyes had coincident topographic steepening with epithelial thickening and normal pachymetry maps. The locations of maximum epithelial thickness and maximum axial power agreed in 93% of the warpage eyes, while the maximum epithelial thickness and maximum mean power agreed in all warpage eyes. Conclusion Results show that epithelial thickness maps and corneal topographic maps are powerful synergistic tools in evaluating eyes with abnormal topography and can help differentiate between keratoconus and nonectatic conditions.

AB - Purpose To distinguish between corneal ectasia and contact lens–related warpage by characteristic patterns on corneal topography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) epithelial thickness maps. Setting Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA. Design Prospective and retrospective case series. Methods Axial and mean power maps were obtained on corneal topography systems. Epithelial thickness maps were generated using RTVue OCT. A sector divider was applied to all maps. The locations of the minimum epithelial thickness, maximum epithelial thickness, maximum axial power, and maximum mean power were determined based on sector averages. Agreement was defined as the extremums occurring in the same or adjacent sectors. Results Twenty-one eyes with keratoconus, 6 eyes with forme fruste keratoconus (better eye of asymmetric keratoconus), and 15 eyes with contact lens–related warpage were identified. The keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus eyes had coincident topographic steepening with epithelial thinning. The locations of minimum epithelial thickness and maximum axial power agreed in 90% of the keratoconic eyes, while the minimum epithelial thickness and maximum mean power agreed in 95% of them. Conversely, the warpage eyes had coincident topographic steepening with epithelial thickening and normal pachymetry maps. The locations of maximum epithelial thickness and maximum axial power agreed in 93% of the warpage eyes, while the maximum epithelial thickness and maximum mean power agreed in all warpage eyes. Conclusion Results show that epithelial thickness maps and corneal topographic maps are powerful synergistic tools in evaluating eyes with abnormal topography and can help differentiate between keratoconus and nonectatic conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015457714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015457714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.10.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 28317679

AN - SCOPUS:85015457714

VL - 43

SP - 60

EP - 66

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 1

ER -